Of straw figures and multi-stakeholder monitoring: a response to Willem Schinkel

Fran Meissner

doi:10.1186/s40878-019-0121-y

Of straw figures and multi-stakeholder monitoring: a response to Willem Schinkel

Fran Meissner

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Academic › peer-review

18 Citations (Scopus)

23 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This article is a response to Willem Schinkel’s provocation piece. While mostly agreeing with Schinkel, my response questions Schinkel’s commitment to losing immigrant integration as an object of analysis. I point to the integrationist logic with which Schinkel assaults superdiversity, to more broadly question how prescriptive a social science that is ‘against immigrant integration’ should be.

Original language	English
Article number	18
Number of pages	8
Journal	Comparative migration studies
Volume	7
Issue number	1
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1186/s40878-019-0121-y
Publication status	Published - 13 May 2019
Externally published	Yes

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

SDG 10 Reduced Inequalities

Keywords

Superdiversity
Straw figure argument
Immigrant integration
Disintegration
ITC-CV
n/a OA procedure

Access to Document

10.1186/s40878-019-0121-yLicence: CC BY

Meissner-2019-Of-straw-figures-and-multi-stakeholFinal published version, 364 KBLicence: CC BY

Cite this

@article{db3cb92ede7a43ffa3d030fc46848fec,

title = "Of straw figures and multi-stakeholder monitoring: a response to Willem Schinkel",

abstract = "This article is a response to Willem Schinkel{\textquoteright}s provocation piece. While mostly agreeing with Schinkel, my response questions Schinkel{\textquoteright}s commitment to losing immigrant integration as an object of analysis. I point to the integrationist logic with which Schinkel assaults superdiversity, to more broadly question how prescriptive a social science that is {\textquoteleft}against immigrant integration{\textquoteright} should be.",

keywords = "Superdiversity, Straw figure argument, Immigrant integration, Disintegration, ITC-CV, n/a OA procedure",

author = "Fran Meissner",

note = "M1 - 18",

year = "2019",

month = may,

day = "13",

doi = "10.1186/s40878-019-0121-y",

language = "English",

volume = "7",

journal = "Comparative migration studies",

issn = "2214-594x",

publisher = "SpringerOpen",

number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Of straw figures and multi-stakeholder monitoring

T2 - a response to Willem Schinkel

AU - Meissner, Fran

N1 - M1 - 18

PY - 2019/5/13

Y1 - 2019/5/13

N2 - This article is a response to Willem Schinkel’s provocation piece. While mostly agreeing with Schinkel, my response questions Schinkel’s commitment to losing immigrant integration as an object of analysis. I point to the integrationist logic with which Schinkel assaults superdiversity, to more broadly question how prescriptive a social science that is ‘against immigrant integration’ should be.

AB - This article is a response to Willem Schinkel’s provocation piece. While mostly agreeing with Schinkel, my response questions Schinkel’s commitment to losing immigrant integration as an object of analysis. I point to the integrationist logic with which Schinkel assaults superdiversity, to more broadly question how prescriptive a social science that is ‘against immigrant integration’ should be.

KW - Superdiversity

KW - Straw figure argument

KW - Immigrant integration

KW - Disintegration

KW - ITC-CV

KW - n/a OA procedure

U2 - 10.1186/s40878-019-0121-y

DO - 10.1186/s40878-019-0121-y

M3 - Article

SN - 2214-594x

VL - 7

JO - Comparative migration studies

JF - Comparative migration studies

IS - 1

M1 - 18

ER -

Of straw figures and multi-stakeholder monitoring: a response to Willem Schinkel

Abstract

UN SDGs

Keywords

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Cite this