On the formulation of the dynamic mixed subgrid-scale model

Bert Vreman; Bernard Geurts; Hans Kuerten

doi:10.1063/1.868333

On the formulation of the dynamic mixed subgrid-scale model

Bert Vreman, Bernard Geurts, Hans Kuerten

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Academic › peer-review

195 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The dynamic mixed subgrid‐scale model of Zang et al. [Phys. Fluids A 5, 3186 (1993)] (DMM1) is modified with respect to the incorporation of the similarity model in order to remove a mathematical inconsistency. Compared to DMM1, the magnitude of the dynamic model coefficient of the modified model (DMM2) is increased considerably, while it is still significantly smaller than as occurs in the dynamic subgrid‐scale eddy‐viscosity model of Germano [J. Fluid Mech. 238, 325 (1992)] (DSM). Large eddy simulations(LES) for the weakly compressible mixing layer are conducted using these three models and results are compared with direct numerical simulation (DNS) data. LES based on DMM1 gives a significant improvement over LES using DSM, while even better agreement is achieved with DMM2.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	4057-4059
Number of pages	3
Journal	Physics of fluids
Volume	6
Issue number	12
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1063/1.868333
Publication status	Published - 1994

Access to Document

10.1063/1.868333

Vreman1994onFinal published version, 252 KB

Cite this

@article{5f6fed4a8d844ff9ae147b97a6546424,

title = "On the formulation of the dynamic mixed subgrid-scale model",

abstract = "The dynamic mixed subgrid‐scale model of Zang et al. [Phys. Fluids A 5, 3186 (1993)] (DMM1) is modified with respect to the incorporation of the similarity model in order to remove a mathematical inconsistency. Compared to DMM1, the magnitude of the dynamic model coefficient of the modified model (DMM2) is increased considerably, while it is still significantly smaller than as occurs in the dynamic subgrid‐scale eddy‐viscosity model of Germano [J. Fluid Mech. 238, 325 (1992)] (DSM). Large eddy simulations(LES) for the weakly compressible mixing layer are conducted using these three models and results are compared with direct numerical simulation (DNS) data. LES based on DMM1 gives a significant improvement over LES using DSM, while even better agreement is achieved with DMM2.",

author = "Bert Vreman and Bernard Geurts and Hans Kuerten",

year = "1994",

doi = "10.1063/1.868333",

language = "English",

volume = "6",

pages = "4057--4059",

journal = "Physics of fluids",

issn = "1070-6631",

publisher = "American Institute of Physics",

number = "12",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - On the formulation of the dynamic mixed subgrid-scale model

AU - Vreman, Bert

AU - Geurts, Bernard

AU - Kuerten, Hans

PY - 1994

Y1 - 1994

N2 - The dynamic mixed subgrid‐scale model of Zang et al. [Phys. Fluids A 5, 3186 (1993)] (DMM1) is modified with respect to the incorporation of the similarity model in order to remove a mathematical inconsistency. Compared to DMM1, the magnitude of the dynamic model coefficient of the modified model (DMM2) is increased considerably, while it is still significantly smaller than as occurs in the dynamic subgrid‐scale eddy‐viscosity model of Germano [J. Fluid Mech. 238, 325 (1992)] (DSM). Large eddy simulations(LES) for the weakly compressible mixing layer are conducted using these three models and results are compared with direct numerical simulation (DNS) data. LES based on DMM1 gives a significant improvement over LES using DSM, while even better agreement is achieved with DMM2.

AB - The dynamic mixed subgrid‐scale model of Zang et al. [Phys. Fluids A 5, 3186 (1993)] (DMM1) is modified with respect to the incorporation of the similarity model in order to remove a mathematical inconsistency. Compared to DMM1, the magnitude of the dynamic model coefficient of the modified model (DMM2) is increased considerably, while it is still significantly smaller than as occurs in the dynamic subgrid‐scale eddy‐viscosity model of Germano [J. Fluid Mech. 238, 325 (1992)] (DSM). Large eddy simulations(LES) for the weakly compressible mixing layer are conducted using these three models and results are compared with direct numerical simulation (DNS) data. LES based on DMM1 gives a significant improvement over LES using DSM, while even better agreement is achieved with DMM2.

U2 - 10.1063/1.868333

DO - 10.1063/1.868333

M3 - Article

SN - 1070-6631

VL - 6

SP - 4057

EP - 4059

JO - Physics of fluids

JF - Physics of fluids

IS - 12

ER -

On the formulation of the dynamic mixed subgrid-scale model

Abstract

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Cite this