Ontologies to interpret remote sensing images: why do we need them?

Damien Arvor (Corresponding Author), M. Belgiu, Zoe Falomir, Isabelle Mougenot, Laurent Durieux

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

5 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The development of new sensors and easier access to remote sensing data are significantly transforming both the theory and practice of remote sensing. Although data-driven approaches based on innovative algorithms and enhanced computing capacities are gaining importance to process big Earth Observation data, the development of knowledge-driven approaches is still considered by the remote sensing community to be one of the most important directions of their research. In this context, the future of remote sensing science should be supported by knowledge representation techniques such as ontologies. However, ontology-based remote sensing applications still have difficulty capturing the attention of remote sensing experts. This is mainly because of the gap between remote sensing experts’ expectations of ontologies and their real possible contribution to remote sensing. This paper provides insights to help reduce this gap. To this end, the conceptual limitations of the knowledge-driven approaches currently used in remote sensing science are clarified first. Then, the different modes of definition of geographic concepts, their duality, vagueness and ambiguity, and the sensory and semantic gaps are discussed in order to explain why ontologies can help address these limitations. In particular, this paper focuses on the capacity of ontologies to represent both symbolic and numeric knowledge, to reason based on cognitive semantics and to share knowledge on the interpretation of remote sensing images. Finally, a few recommendations are provided for remote sensing experts to comprehend the advantages of ontologies in interpreting satellite images.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)911-939
Number of pages29
JournalGIScience & remote sensing
Volume56
Issue number6
Early online date26 Mar 2019
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2019

Fingerprint

remote sensing
need
sensor

Keywords

  • ontologies, remote sensing, knowledge-driven approach, geographic features, image interpretation, cognitive semantics, sensory gap, semantic gap
  • ITC-ISI-JOURNAL-ARTICLE
  • UT-Hybrid-D
  • ITC-HYBRID

Cite this

Arvor, Damien ; Belgiu, M. ; Falomir, Zoe ; Mougenot, Isabelle ; Durieux, Laurent. / Ontologies to interpret remote sensing images : why do we need them?. In: GIScience & remote sensing. 2019 ; Vol. 56, No. 6. pp. 911-939 .
@article{3c56d0adde8e41279684d5e060ad3ed5,
title = "Ontologies to interpret remote sensing images: why do we need them?",
abstract = "The development of new sensors and easier access to remote sensing data are significantly transforming both the theory and practice of remote sensing. Although data-driven approaches based on innovative algorithms and enhanced computing capacities are gaining importance to process big Earth Observation data, the development of knowledge-driven approaches is still considered by the remote sensing community to be one of the most important directions of their research. In this context, the future of remote sensing science should be supported by knowledge representation techniques such as ontologies. However, ontology-based remote sensing applications still have difficulty capturing the attention of remote sensing experts. This is mainly because of the gap between remote sensing experts’ expectations of ontologies and their real possible contribution to remote sensing. This paper provides insights to help reduce this gap. To this end, the conceptual limitations of the knowledge-driven approaches currently used in remote sensing science are clarified first. Then, the different modes of definition of geographic concepts, their duality, vagueness and ambiguity, and the sensory and semantic gaps are discussed in order to explain why ontologies can help address these limitations. In particular, this paper focuses on the capacity of ontologies to represent both symbolic and numeric knowledge, to reason based on cognitive semantics and to share knowledge on the interpretation of remote sensing images. Finally, a few recommendations are provided for remote sensing experts to comprehend the advantages of ontologies in interpreting satellite images.",
keywords = "ontologies, remote sensing, knowledge-driven approach, geographic features, image interpretation, cognitive semantics, sensory gap, semantic gap, ITC-ISI-JOURNAL-ARTICLE, UT-Hybrid-D, ITC-HYBRID",
author = "Damien Arvor and M. Belgiu and Zoe Falomir and Isabelle Mougenot and Laurent Durieux",
year = "2019",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1080/15481603.2019.1587890",
language = "English",
volume = "56",
pages = "911--939",
journal = "GIScience & remote sensing",
issn = "1548-1603",
publisher = "Taylor & Francis",
number = "6",

}

Ontologies to interpret remote sensing images : why do we need them? / Arvor, Damien (Corresponding Author); Belgiu, M.; Falomir, Zoe; Mougenot, Isabelle; Durieux, Laurent.

In: GIScience & remote sensing, Vol. 56, No. 6, 06.2019, p. 911-939 .

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Ontologies to interpret remote sensing images

T2 - why do we need them?

AU - Arvor, Damien

AU - Belgiu, M.

AU - Falomir, Zoe

AU - Mougenot, Isabelle

AU - Durieux, Laurent

PY - 2019/6

Y1 - 2019/6

N2 - The development of new sensors and easier access to remote sensing data are significantly transforming both the theory and practice of remote sensing. Although data-driven approaches based on innovative algorithms and enhanced computing capacities are gaining importance to process big Earth Observation data, the development of knowledge-driven approaches is still considered by the remote sensing community to be one of the most important directions of their research. In this context, the future of remote sensing science should be supported by knowledge representation techniques such as ontologies. However, ontology-based remote sensing applications still have difficulty capturing the attention of remote sensing experts. This is mainly because of the gap between remote sensing experts’ expectations of ontologies and their real possible contribution to remote sensing. This paper provides insights to help reduce this gap. To this end, the conceptual limitations of the knowledge-driven approaches currently used in remote sensing science are clarified first. Then, the different modes of definition of geographic concepts, their duality, vagueness and ambiguity, and the sensory and semantic gaps are discussed in order to explain why ontologies can help address these limitations. In particular, this paper focuses on the capacity of ontologies to represent both symbolic and numeric knowledge, to reason based on cognitive semantics and to share knowledge on the interpretation of remote sensing images. Finally, a few recommendations are provided for remote sensing experts to comprehend the advantages of ontologies in interpreting satellite images.

AB - The development of new sensors and easier access to remote sensing data are significantly transforming both the theory and practice of remote sensing. Although data-driven approaches based on innovative algorithms and enhanced computing capacities are gaining importance to process big Earth Observation data, the development of knowledge-driven approaches is still considered by the remote sensing community to be one of the most important directions of their research. In this context, the future of remote sensing science should be supported by knowledge representation techniques such as ontologies. However, ontology-based remote sensing applications still have difficulty capturing the attention of remote sensing experts. This is mainly because of the gap between remote sensing experts’ expectations of ontologies and their real possible contribution to remote sensing. This paper provides insights to help reduce this gap. To this end, the conceptual limitations of the knowledge-driven approaches currently used in remote sensing science are clarified first. Then, the different modes of definition of geographic concepts, their duality, vagueness and ambiguity, and the sensory and semantic gaps are discussed in order to explain why ontologies can help address these limitations. In particular, this paper focuses on the capacity of ontologies to represent both symbolic and numeric knowledge, to reason based on cognitive semantics and to share knowledge on the interpretation of remote sensing images. Finally, a few recommendations are provided for remote sensing experts to comprehend the advantages of ontologies in interpreting satellite images.

KW - ontologies, remote sensing, knowledge-driven approach, geographic features, image interpretation, cognitive semantics, sensory gap, semantic gap

KW - ITC-ISI-JOURNAL-ARTICLE

KW - UT-Hybrid-D

KW - ITC-HYBRID

UR - https://ezproxy2.utwente.nl/login?url=https://library.itc.utwente.nl/login/2019/isi/belgiu_ont.pdf

U2 - 10.1080/15481603.2019.1587890

DO - 10.1080/15481603.2019.1587890

M3 - Article

VL - 56

SP - 911

EP - 939

JO - GIScience & remote sensing

JF - GIScience & remote sensing

SN - 1548-1603

IS - 6

ER -