Openness and scientists' everyday research processes

Julia Olmos-Penuela, Paul Stephen Benneworth, Elena Castro-Martinez

Research output: Working paperProfessional

41 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Science policy increasingly focuses on maximising societal benefits from science and technology investments, but often reduces those benefits to activities involving codifying and selling knowledge, thereby idealising best practice academic behaviours around entrepreneurial superstars. This paper argues that societal value depends on knowledge being used, making knowledge’s eventual exploitation partly dependent upon on whether other users ‐ societal or scientific ‐ can use that knowledge, i.e. on how far new knowledge is cognate with users’ existing knowledge. When scientists incorporate user knowledge in their research processes, what we call ‘open research behaviours’, their knowledge may be more usable. We develop a set of hypotheses concerning whether researchers’ personal and professional characteristics are associated with open research behaviour, finding evidence suggesting whilst personal characteristics are not associated with open research behaviours; researchers that experience professional signals validating open research behaviours are more likely to demonstrate open research behaviour.
Original languageEnglish
Pages-
Number of pages30
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015

Publication series

NameCHEPS working paper series
No.04
Volume2015
ISSN (Electronic)2589-9716

Fingerprint

research process
entrepreneurial behavior
professional experience
science policy
selling
knowledge
best practice
exploitation
science
evidence
Values

Keywords

  • IR-97283
  • METIS-320813

Cite this

Olmos-Penuela, J., Benneworth, P. S., & Castro-Martinez, E. (2015). Openness and scientists' everyday research processes. (pp. -). (CHEPS working paper series; Vol. 2015, No. 04). https://doi.org/10.3990/4.2589-9716.2015.04
Olmos-Penuela, Julia ; Benneworth, Paul Stephen ; Castro-Martinez, Elena. / Openness and scientists' everyday research processes. 2015. pp. - (CHEPS working paper series; 04).
@techreport{590ff5f072a549dabf11f7fceac4a9dc,
title = "Openness and scientists' everyday research processes",
abstract = "Science policy increasingly focuses on maximising societal benefits from science and technology investments, but often reduces those benefits to activities involving codifying and selling knowledge, thereby idealising best practice academic behaviours around entrepreneurial superstars. This paper argues that societal value depends on knowledge being used, making knowledge’s eventual exploitation partly dependent upon on whether other users ‐ societal or scientific ‐ can use that knowledge, i.e. on how far new knowledge is cognate with users’ existing knowledge. When scientists incorporate user knowledge in their research processes, what we call ‘open research behaviours’, their knowledge may be more usable. We develop a set of hypotheses concerning whether researchers’ personal and professional characteristics are associated with open research behaviour, finding evidence suggesting whilst personal characteristics are not associated with open research behaviours; researchers that experience professional signals validating open research behaviours are more likely to demonstrate open research behaviour.",
keywords = "IR-97283, METIS-320813",
author = "Julia Olmos-Penuela and Benneworth, {Paul Stephen} and Elena Castro-Martinez",
year = "2015",
doi = "10.3990/4.2589-9716.2015.04",
language = "English",
series = "CHEPS working paper series",
number = "04",
pages = "--",
type = "WorkingPaper",

}

Olmos-Penuela, J, Benneworth, PS & Castro-Martinez, E 2015 'Openness and scientists' everyday research processes' CHEPS working paper series, no. 04, vol. 2015, pp. -. https://doi.org/10.3990/4.2589-9716.2015.04

Openness and scientists' everyday research processes. / Olmos-Penuela, Julia; Benneworth, Paul Stephen; Castro-Martinez, Elena.

2015. p. - (CHEPS working paper series; Vol. 2015, No. 04).

Research output: Working paperProfessional

TY - UNPB

T1 - Openness and scientists' everyday research processes

AU - Olmos-Penuela, Julia

AU - Benneworth, Paul Stephen

AU - Castro-Martinez, Elena

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - Science policy increasingly focuses on maximising societal benefits from science and technology investments, but often reduces those benefits to activities involving codifying and selling knowledge, thereby idealising best practice academic behaviours around entrepreneurial superstars. This paper argues that societal value depends on knowledge being used, making knowledge’s eventual exploitation partly dependent upon on whether other users ‐ societal or scientific ‐ can use that knowledge, i.e. on how far new knowledge is cognate with users’ existing knowledge. When scientists incorporate user knowledge in their research processes, what we call ‘open research behaviours’, their knowledge may be more usable. We develop a set of hypotheses concerning whether researchers’ personal and professional characteristics are associated with open research behaviour, finding evidence suggesting whilst personal characteristics are not associated with open research behaviours; researchers that experience professional signals validating open research behaviours are more likely to demonstrate open research behaviour.

AB - Science policy increasingly focuses on maximising societal benefits from science and technology investments, but often reduces those benefits to activities involving codifying and selling knowledge, thereby idealising best practice academic behaviours around entrepreneurial superstars. This paper argues that societal value depends on knowledge being used, making knowledge’s eventual exploitation partly dependent upon on whether other users ‐ societal or scientific ‐ can use that knowledge, i.e. on how far new knowledge is cognate with users’ existing knowledge. When scientists incorporate user knowledge in their research processes, what we call ‘open research behaviours’, their knowledge may be more usable. We develop a set of hypotheses concerning whether researchers’ personal and professional characteristics are associated with open research behaviour, finding evidence suggesting whilst personal characteristics are not associated with open research behaviours; researchers that experience professional signals validating open research behaviours are more likely to demonstrate open research behaviour.

KW - IR-97283

KW - METIS-320813

U2 - 10.3990/4.2589-9716.2015.04

DO - 10.3990/4.2589-9716.2015.04

M3 - Working paper

T3 - CHEPS working paper series

SP - -

BT - Openness and scientists' everyday research processes

ER -

Olmos-Penuela J, Benneworth PS, Castro-Martinez E. Openness and scientists' everyday research processes. 2015, p. -. (CHEPS working paper series; 04). https://doi.org/10.3990/4.2589-9716.2015.04