Opportunities, Constraints and Perceptions of Rural Communities Regarding Their Potential to Contribute to Forest Landscape Transitions Under REDD+: Case Studies from Mexico

M. Skutsch, A. Borrego, L. Morales-Barquero, J. Paneque-Gálvez, M. Salinas Melgoza, M.I. Ramirez, D. Perez-Salicrup, D. Benet, S. Monroy, Y. Gao

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

60 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

In Mexico, REDD+ is being presented as a win-win policy enabling forest communities to benefit financially and diversify their income sources while preserving and increasing their forest carbon stocks through more sustainable management. Under the national programme, it is expected that forest communities will have opportunities to tailor their own approaches. However, to date there is little understanding about what opportunities and constraints exist in reality for forest communities to contribute to REDD+, and even less about how their members perceive these opportunities. We assess potential and constraints at community level and investigate perceptions about opportunities in REDD+ and strategies that communities are currently envisaging for participation, in seven communities in the Ayuquila River Basin and around the Chamela-Cuixmala Biosphere Reserve in Jalisco, and in the area surrounding the Monarch Butterfly Reserve in Michoacan. We find that there is more opportunity for reduced degradation and forest enhancement than for reduced deforestation, in all the communities; that it may be difficult to establish additionality for REDD+ activities in some communities; that the amount of forest resource per community may greatly affect the potential to participate; that the presence of people with no land rights may complicate the distribution of benefits; that communities expect REDD+ in general to follow the Payment for Environmental Services model, and that lack of information about what activities may count as REDD+ activities and what level of financial rewards may be expected mean that communities cannot at present adequately appraise whether REDD+ will be worth their while or not
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)65-84
JournalInternational forestry review
Volume17
Issue numberS1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015

Fingerprint

rural communities
forest communities
rural community
Mexico
case studies
land rights
Danaus plexippus
community
forest resources
deforestation
carbon sinks
ecosystem services
income
forest resource
degradation
butterfly
biosphere reserve
river basin
carbon
reward

Cite this

Skutsch, M. ; Borrego, A. ; Morales-Barquero, L. ; Paneque-Gálvez, J. ; Salinas Melgoza, M. ; Ramirez, M.I. ; Perez-Salicrup, D. ; Benet, D. ; Monroy, S. ; Gao, Y. / Opportunities, Constraints and Perceptions of Rural Communities Regarding Their Potential to Contribute to Forest Landscape Transitions Under REDD+ : Case Studies from Mexico. In: International forestry review. 2015 ; Vol. 17, No. S1. pp. 65-84.
@article{1810ff0557bc4e6fb5e299d1b40aa77c,
title = "Opportunities, Constraints and Perceptions of Rural Communities Regarding Their Potential to Contribute to Forest Landscape Transitions Under REDD+: Case Studies from Mexico",
abstract = "In Mexico, REDD+ is being presented as a win-win policy enabling forest communities to benefit financially and diversify their income sources while preserving and increasing their forest carbon stocks through more sustainable management. Under the national programme, it is expected that forest communities will have opportunities to tailor their own approaches. However, to date there is little understanding about what opportunities and constraints exist in reality for forest communities to contribute to REDD+, and even less about how their members perceive these opportunities. We assess potential and constraints at community level and investigate perceptions about opportunities in REDD+ and strategies that communities are currently envisaging for participation, in seven communities in the Ayuquila River Basin and around the Chamela-Cuixmala Biosphere Reserve in Jalisco, and in the area surrounding the Monarch Butterfly Reserve in Michoacan. We find that there is more opportunity for reduced degradation and forest enhancement than for reduced deforestation, in all the communities; that it may be difficult to establish additionality for REDD+ activities in some communities; that the amount of forest resource per community may greatly affect the potential to participate; that the presence of people with no land rights may complicate the distribution of benefits; that communities expect REDD+ in general to follow the Payment for Environmental Services model, and that lack of information about what activities may count as REDD+ activities and what level of financial rewards may be expected mean that communities cannot at present adequately appraise whether REDD+ will be worth their while or not",
author = "M. Skutsch and A. Borrego and L. Morales-Barquero and J. Paneque-G{\'a}lvez and {Salinas Melgoza}, M. and M.I. Ramirez and D. Perez-Salicrup and D. Benet and S. Monroy and Y. Gao",
year = "2015",
doi = "10.1505/146554815814669025",
language = "English",
volume = "17",
pages = "65--84",
journal = "International forestry review",
issn = "1465-5489",
publisher = "Commonwealth Forestry Association",
number = "S1",

}

Skutsch, M, Borrego, A, Morales-Barquero, L, Paneque-Gálvez, J, Salinas Melgoza, M, Ramirez, MI, Perez-Salicrup, D, Benet, D, Monroy, S & Gao, Y 2015, 'Opportunities, Constraints and Perceptions of Rural Communities Regarding Their Potential to Contribute to Forest Landscape Transitions Under REDD+: Case Studies from Mexico' International forestry review, vol. 17, no. S1, pp. 65-84. https://doi.org/10.1505/146554815814669025

Opportunities, Constraints and Perceptions of Rural Communities Regarding Their Potential to Contribute to Forest Landscape Transitions Under REDD+ : Case Studies from Mexico. / Skutsch, M.; Borrego, A.; Morales-Barquero, L.; Paneque-Gálvez, J.; Salinas Melgoza, M.; Ramirez, M.I.; Perez-Salicrup, D.; Benet, D.; Monroy, S.; Gao, Y.

In: International forestry review, Vol. 17, No. S1, 2015, p. 65-84.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Opportunities, Constraints and Perceptions of Rural Communities Regarding Their Potential to Contribute to Forest Landscape Transitions Under REDD+

T2 - Case Studies from Mexico

AU - Skutsch, M.

AU - Borrego, A.

AU - Morales-Barquero, L.

AU - Paneque-Gálvez, J.

AU - Salinas Melgoza, M.

AU - Ramirez, M.I.

AU - Perez-Salicrup, D.

AU - Benet, D.

AU - Monroy, S.

AU - Gao, Y.

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - In Mexico, REDD+ is being presented as a win-win policy enabling forest communities to benefit financially and diversify their income sources while preserving and increasing their forest carbon stocks through more sustainable management. Under the national programme, it is expected that forest communities will have opportunities to tailor their own approaches. However, to date there is little understanding about what opportunities and constraints exist in reality for forest communities to contribute to REDD+, and even less about how their members perceive these opportunities. We assess potential and constraints at community level and investigate perceptions about opportunities in REDD+ and strategies that communities are currently envisaging for participation, in seven communities in the Ayuquila River Basin and around the Chamela-Cuixmala Biosphere Reserve in Jalisco, and in the area surrounding the Monarch Butterfly Reserve in Michoacan. We find that there is more opportunity for reduced degradation and forest enhancement than for reduced deforestation, in all the communities; that it may be difficult to establish additionality for REDD+ activities in some communities; that the amount of forest resource per community may greatly affect the potential to participate; that the presence of people with no land rights may complicate the distribution of benefits; that communities expect REDD+ in general to follow the Payment for Environmental Services model, and that lack of information about what activities may count as REDD+ activities and what level of financial rewards may be expected mean that communities cannot at present adequately appraise whether REDD+ will be worth their while or not

AB - In Mexico, REDD+ is being presented as a win-win policy enabling forest communities to benefit financially and diversify their income sources while preserving and increasing their forest carbon stocks through more sustainable management. Under the national programme, it is expected that forest communities will have opportunities to tailor their own approaches. However, to date there is little understanding about what opportunities and constraints exist in reality for forest communities to contribute to REDD+, and even less about how their members perceive these opportunities. We assess potential and constraints at community level and investigate perceptions about opportunities in REDD+ and strategies that communities are currently envisaging for participation, in seven communities in the Ayuquila River Basin and around the Chamela-Cuixmala Biosphere Reserve in Jalisco, and in the area surrounding the Monarch Butterfly Reserve in Michoacan. We find that there is more opportunity for reduced degradation and forest enhancement than for reduced deforestation, in all the communities; that it may be difficult to establish additionality for REDD+ activities in some communities; that the amount of forest resource per community may greatly affect the potential to participate; that the presence of people with no land rights may complicate the distribution of benefits; that communities expect REDD+ in general to follow the Payment for Environmental Services model, and that lack of information about what activities may count as REDD+ activities and what level of financial rewards may be expected mean that communities cannot at present adequately appraise whether REDD+ will be worth their while or not

U2 - 10.1505/146554815814669025

DO - 10.1505/146554815814669025

M3 - Article

VL - 17

SP - 65

EP - 84

JO - International forestry review

JF - International forestry review

SN - 1465-5489

IS - S1

ER -