Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

P50 gating is not affected by selective attention

  • Kuan H. Kho
  • , Robbert J. Verkes
  • , Paul Eling
  • , Machiel J. Zwarts
  • , Bart Ellenbroek
  • , Gilles van Luijtelaar*
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

The influence of selective attention on P50 gating - the decline of the amplitude of the P50 component of the auditory evoked potential (AEP) to the second of a pair of clicks - was examined. Three conditions were presented in counterbalanced order to 29 healthy volunteers: a baseline condition, in which the double click was presented and no specific task was required, an attention condition in which attention to the clicks was required, and a distraction condition in which paired clicks were presented during rehearsal time of a reversed digit span task. P50 gating, as measured with ratio and difference scores, did not differ across the three conditions. However, the amplitude of the N100 showed an increase in the attention condition compared to the two nonattention conditions, supporting the validity of our task manipulations. The data on P50 demonstrate that P50 gating is not affected by attentional manipulations.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)23-29
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of psychophysiology
Volume17
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2003
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • AEP
  • Auditory evoked potentials
  • N100
  • P1
  • P50
  • P50 gating
  • Selective attention
  • Sensory gating

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'P50 gating is not affected by selective attention'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this