Painful Discrimination in the Emergency Department: Risk Factors for Underassessment of Patients’ Pain by Nurses

Jorien G.J. Pierik*, Maarten J. IJzerman, Menno I. Gaakeer, Miriam M.R. Vollenbroek-Hutten, Carine J.M. Doggen

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Introduction Unrelieved acute musculoskeletal pain continues to be a reality of major clinical importance, despite advancements in pain management. Accurate pain assessment by nurses is crucial for effective pain management. Yet inaccurate pain assessment is a consistent finding worldwide in various clinical settings, including the emergency department. In this study, pain assessments between nurses and patients with acute musculoskeletal pain after extremity injury will be compared to assess discrepancies. A second aim is to identify patients at high risk for underassessment by emergency nurses. Methods The prospective PROTACT study included 539 adult patients who were admitted to the emergency department with musculoskeletal pain. Data on pain assessment and characteristics of patients including demographics, pain, and injury, psychosocial, and clinical factors were collected using questionnaires and hospital registry. Results Nurses significantly underestimated patients’ pain with a mean difference of 2.4 and a 95% confidence interval of 2.2-2.6 on an 11-points numerical rating scale. Agreement between nurses’ documented and patients’ self-reported pain was only 27%, and 63% of the pain was underassessed. Pain was particularly underassessed in women, in persons with a lower educational level, in patients who used prehospital analgesics, in smokers, in patients with injury to the lower extremities, in anxious patients, and in patients with a lower urgency level. Discussion Underassessment of pain by emergency nurses is still a major problem and might result in undertreatment of pain if the emergency nurses rely on their assessment to provide further pain treatment. Strategies that focus on awareness among nurses of which patients are at high risk of underassessment of pain are needed.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)228-238
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Emergency Nursing
Volume43
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 May 2017

Fingerprint

Hospital Emergency Service
Nurses
Pain
Pain Measurement
Musculoskeletal Pain
Emergencies
Acute Pain
Pain Management
Wounds and Injuries
Analgesics
Registries
Lower Extremity
Extremities
Demography
Prospective Studies
Confidence Intervals
Psychology

Keywords

  • Acute pain assessment
  • Discrepancies, underassessment
  • Emergency department
  • Risk factors

Cite this

@article{74ce5fa98934407fa86d97a55ce8d9f9,
title = "Painful Discrimination in the Emergency Department: Risk Factors for Underassessment of Patients’ Pain by Nurses",
abstract = "Introduction Unrelieved acute musculoskeletal pain continues to be a reality of major clinical importance, despite advancements in pain management. Accurate pain assessment by nurses is crucial for effective pain management. Yet inaccurate pain assessment is a consistent finding worldwide in various clinical settings, including the emergency department. In this study, pain assessments between nurses and patients with acute musculoskeletal pain after extremity injury will be compared to assess discrepancies. A second aim is to identify patients at high risk for underassessment by emergency nurses. Methods The prospective PROTACT study included 539 adult patients who were admitted to the emergency department with musculoskeletal pain. Data on pain assessment and characteristics of patients including demographics, pain, and injury, psychosocial, and clinical factors were collected using questionnaires and hospital registry. Results Nurses significantly underestimated patients’ pain with a mean difference of 2.4 and a 95{\%} confidence interval of 2.2-2.6 on an 11-points numerical rating scale. Agreement between nurses’ documented and patients’ self-reported pain was only 27{\%}, and 63{\%} of the pain was underassessed. Pain was particularly underassessed in women, in persons with a lower educational level, in patients who used prehospital analgesics, in smokers, in patients with injury to the lower extremities, in anxious patients, and in patients with a lower urgency level. Discussion Underassessment of pain by emergency nurses is still a major problem and might result in undertreatment of pain if the emergency nurses rely on their assessment to provide further pain treatment. Strategies that focus on awareness among nurses of which patients are at high risk of underassessment of pain are needed.",
keywords = "Acute pain assessment, Discrepancies, underassessment, Emergency department, Risk factors",
author = "Pierik, {Jorien G.J.} and IJzerman, {Maarten J.} and Gaakeer, {Menno I.} and Vollenbroek-Hutten, {Miriam M.R.} and Doggen, {Carine J.M.}",
year = "2017",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jen.2016.10.007",
language = "English",
volume = "43",
pages = "228--238",
journal = "Journal of Emergency Nursing",
issn = "0099-1767",
publisher = "Mosby Inc.",
number = "3",

}

Painful Discrimination in the Emergency Department : Risk Factors for Underassessment of Patients’ Pain by Nurses. / Pierik, Jorien G.J.; IJzerman, Maarten J.; Gaakeer, Menno I.; Vollenbroek-Hutten, Miriam M.R.; Doggen, Carine J.M.

In: Journal of Emergency Nursing, Vol. 43, No. 3, 01.05.2017, p. 228-238.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Painful Discrimination in the Emergency Department

T2 - Risk Factors for Underassessment of Patients’ Pain by Nurses

AU - Pierik, Jorien G.J.

AU - IJzerman, Maarten J.

AU - Gaakeer, Menno I.

AU - Vollenbroek-Hutten, Miriam M.R.

AU - Doggen, Carine J.M.

PY - 2017/5/1

Y1 - 2017/5/1

N2 - Introduction Unrelieved acute musculoskeletal pain continues to be a reality of major clinical importance, despite advancements in pain management. Accurate pain assessment by nurses is crucial for effective pain management. Yet inaccurate pain assessment is a consistent finding worldwide in various clinical settings, including the emergency department. In this study, pain assessments between nurses and patients with acute musculoskeletal pain after extremity injury will be compared to assess discrepancies. A second aim is to identify patients at high risk for underassessment by emergency nurses. Methods The prospective PROTACT study included 539 adult patients who were admitted to the emergency department with musculoskeletal pain. Data on pain assessment and characteristics of patients including demographics, pain, and injury, psychosocial, and clinical factors were collected using questionnaires and hospital registry. Results Nurses significantly underestimated patients’ pain with a mean difference of 2.4 and a 95% confidence interval of 2.2-2.6 on an 11-points numerical rating scale. Agreement between nurses’ documented and patients’ self-reported pain was only 27%, and 63% of the pain was underassessed. Pain was particularly underassessed in women, in persons with a lower educational level, in patients who used prehospital analgesics, in smokers, in patients with injury to the lower extremities, in anxious patients, and in patients with a lower urgency level. Discussion Underassessment of pain by emergency nurses is still a major problem and might result in undertreatment of pain if the emergency nurses rely on their assessment to provide further pain treatment. Strategies that focus on awareness among nurses of which patients are at high risk of underassessment of pain are needed.

AB - Introduction Unrelieved acute musculoskeletal pain continues to be a reality of major clinical importance, despite advancements in pain management. Accurate pain assessment by nurses is crucial for effective pain management. Yet inaccurate pain assessment is a consistent finding worldwide in various clinical settings, including the emergency department. In this study, pain assessments between nurses and patients with acute musculoskeletal pain after extremity injury will be compared to assess discrepancies. A second aim is to identify patients at high risk for underassessment by emergency nurses. Methods The prospective PROTACT study included 539 adult patients who were admitted to the emergency department with musculoskeletal pain. Data on pain assessment and characteristics of patients including demographics, pain, and injury, psychosocial, and clinical factors were collected using questionnaires and hospital registry. Results Nurses significantly underestimated patients’ pain with a mean difference of 2.4 and a 95% confidence interval of 2.2-2.6 on an 11-points numerical rating scale. Agreement between nurses’ documented and patients’ self-reported pain was only 27%, and 63% of the pain was underassessed. Pain was particularly underassessed in women, in persons with a lower educational level, in patients who used prehospital analgesics, in smokers, in patients with injury to the lower extremities, in anxious patients, and in patients with a lower urgency level. Discussion Underassessment of pain by emergency nurses is still a major problem and might result in undertreatment of pain if the emergency nurses rely on their assessment to provide further pain treatment. Strategies that focus on awareness among nurses of which patients are at high risk of underassessment of pain are needed.

KW - Acute pain assessment

KW - Discrepancies, underassessment

KW - Emergency department

KW - Risk factors

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85016765312&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jen.2016.10.007

DO - 10.1016/j.jen.2016.10.007

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85016765312

VL - 43

SP - 228

EP - 238

JO - Journal of Emergency Nursing

JF - Journal of Emergency Nursing

SN - 0099-1767

IS - 3

ER -