TY - JOUR
T1 - Participatory modelling and systems intelligence
T2 - A systems-based and transdisciplinary partnership
AU - Kenny, Daniel C.
AU - Bakhanova, Elena
AU - Hämäläinen, Raimo P.
AU - Voinov, Alexey
N1 - Funding Information:
Both D.K and E.B are supported by the funding of the Faculty of Engineering and Information Technology, University of Technology Sydney for their PhD research. They gratefully thank their lead supervisor, A.V., and their co-supervisors, Juan Castilla-Rho (D.K.); Jaime Garcia Marin and William Raffe (E.B.).
Funding Information:
Both D.K and E.B are supported by the funding of the Faculty of Engineering and Information Technology, University of Technology Sydney for their PhD research. They gratefully thank their lead supervisor, A.V. and their co-supervisors, Juan Castilla-Rho (D.K.); Jaime Garcia Marin and William Raffe (E.B.).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 Elsevier Ltd
PY - 2022/10
Y1 - 2022/10
N2 - Systems Intelligence (SI) can contribute to the design and practice of Participatory Modelling (PM) by paying attention to the interplay of the ‘soft’ socio-emotional system created by the actors involved and the dynamics created by their interactions and the ‘hard’ structure of the process. Here, we argue that by combining the perspective of SI with the four functions of PM (normative, substantive, instrumental, and educational), we can strengthen a collaborative and positive PM process, systematically designed to create socio-emotional decisions that stakeholders bring out into a wider system with them. This entails drawing from the four functions of PM, (normative, substantive, instrumental, and educational). To provide a blueprint of how each function might be achieved, we examine, through a transdisciplinary lens, the characteristics of each function, the sub-components and practical suggestions of how that might be applied in a PM context. Our main focus is to encourage a systems-based approach to achieving these functions, thereby avoiding piecemeal solutions, so we explore how the perspective of Systems Intelligence provides a lens and organizing structure to consider, design and facilitate PM. SI can help us to conceptualize and design PM, as it understands the central role of people within a dynamic system, a key starting point for those looking to design or direct their own PM process or for those searching (researchers, practitioners, or policymakers) for long-term solutions to problems of socio-ecological systems (SES). We look at how these two fields, PM and SI, might combine in practice, and suggest several promising areas of study to explore further. These insights will be of use to PM facilitators and researchers, as well as others using participatory methods in addressing SES challenges, particularly those encouraging the adoption of systemic perspectives, like Systems Intelligence.
AB - Systems Intelligence (SI) can contribute to the design and practice of Participatory Modelling (PM) by paying attention to the interplay of the ‘soft’ socio-emotional system created by the actors involved and the dynamics created by their interactions and the ‘hard’ structure of the process. Here, we argue that by combining the perspective of SI with the four functions of PM (normative, substantive, instrumental, and educational), we can strengthen a collaborative and positive PM process, systematically designed to create socio-emotional decisions that stakeholders bring out into a wider system with them. This entails drawing from the four functions of PM, (normative, substantive, instrumental, and educational). To provide a blueprint of how each function might be achieved, we examine, through a transdisciplinary lens, the characteristics of each function, the sub-components and practical suggestions of how that might be applied in a PM context. Our main focus is to encourage a systems-based approach to achieving these functions, thereby avoiding piecemeal solutions, so we explore how the perspective of Systems Intelligence provides a lens and organizing structure to consider, design and facilitate PM. SI can help us to conceptualize and design PM, as it understands the central role of people within a dynamic system, a key starting point for those looking to design or direct their own PM process or for those searching (researchers, practitioners, or policymakers) for long-term solutions to problems of socio-ecological systems (SES). We look at how these two fields, PM and SI, might combine in practice, and suggest several promising areas of study to explore further. These insights will be of use to PM facilitators and researchers, as well as others using participatory methods in addressing SES challenges, particularly those encouraging the adoption of systemic perspectives, like Systems Intelligence.
KW - UT-Hybrid-D
KW - 2023 OA procedure
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85134853574&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.seps.2022.101310
DO - 10.1016/j.seps.2022.101310
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:85134853574
SN - 0038-0121
VL - 83
JO - Socio-Economic Planning Sciences
JF - Socio-Economic Planning Sciences
M1 - 101310
ER -