People's strategies for perceived surveillance in Amsterdam Smart City

Shazade Jameson*, C. Richter, Linnet Taylor

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)
56 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

In this paper, we investigate people’s perception of datafication and surveillance in Amsterdam Smart City. Based on a series of focus groups, we show how people understand new forms of hypervisbility, what strategies they use to navigate these experiences, and what the limitations of these strategies are. We show how people tried to discern between public and private sector actors, to differentiate who they trusted by building on the existing social contract. People also trusted the objectivity of data in relation to prior experiences of social contexts and discrimination. Lastly, we show how the experiences of some of the inhabitants in our study who were most vulnerable to hypervisibility highlight the limits to strategies based on the neutrality of data. By asking about perceived surveillance rather than emphasising actual practices of surveilling, we show differentiated contexts and strategies, providing empirical grounds to question the dominant technical framing of smart cities.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1467-1484
Number of pages18
JournalUrban Geography
Volume40
Issue number10
Early online date15 May 2019
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 26 Nov 2019

Keywords

  • ITC-ISI-JOURNAL-ARTICLE
  • ITC-HYBRID
  • UT-Hybrid-D

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'People's strategies for perceived surveillance in Amsterdam Smart City'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this