Pervasive Normativity and Emerging Technologies

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterAcademicpeer-review

    2 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Normativity is everywhere. It is taken up in ethics, but also in law and political theory, and more implicitly in economics and sociology. And there is the de facto normativity of master narratives and imaginaries, like the modernist narrative of progress—in particular progress through science. There is also, underlying many normative issues, the fundamental challenge (die ärgerliche Tatsache) of social order, as a value in its own right, and thus to be conserved, and/or as a constraint that needs to be opened up. This essential ambivalence of social order feeds into the discourse about innovation, which can be embraced as wonderful, or criticised as deviant and possibly dangerous (cf. Godin 2010). Issues thrown up by emerging technologies partake in this fundamental challenge, and are thus broader (and deeper) than questions of risk and other immediate effects on society. This is the first level of pervasiveness of normativity. One implication is that the achievements of ethics, ‘the rich and diverse work of the past 2,500 years of moral philosophy’ (Baggini and Fosl 2007: p. xvi), while considerable and to be built upon, cover only part of the articulations of normativity, in spite of the claim of ethicists that normativity is their special domain. I will discuss other articulations of normativity as in law, governance and sociology, and also consider ‘sites’ where pervasive normativity is visible. My own experience with constructive technology assessment (CTA) will be one such ‘site’
    Original languageEnglish
    Title of host publicationEthics on the Laboratory Floor
    EditorsSimone van der Burg, Tsjalling Swierstra
    Place of PublicationLondon
    PublisherPalgrave Macmillan Ltd.
    Pages191-212
    ISBN (Electronic)978-1-137-00293-8
    ISBN (Print)978-1-349-43407-7
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2013

    Fingerprint

    normativity
    moral philosophy
    social order
    sociology
    narrative
    technology assessment
    Law
    political theory
    ambivalence
    governance
    innovation
    discourse
    science
    economics

    Keywords

    • Political theory
    • Moral luck
    • Responsible research and innovation
    • Moral labour

    Cite this

    Rip, A. (2013). Pervasive Normativity and Emerging Technologies. In S. van der Burg, & T. Swierstra (Eds.), Ethics on the Laboratory Floor (pp. 191-212). London: Palgrave Macmillan Ltd.. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137002938_11
    Rip, Arie. / Pervasive Normativity and Emerging Technologies. Ethics on the Laboratory Floor. editor / Simone van der Burg ; Tsjalling Swierstra. London : Palgrave Macmillan Ltd., 2013. pp. 191-212
    @inbook{abc22511d6a94f3eaefecca72b6b2800,
    title = "Pervasive Normativity and Emerging Technologies",
    abstract = "Normativity is everywhere. It is taken up in ethics, but also in law and political theory, and more implicitly in economics and sociology. And there is the de facto normativity of master narratives and imaginaries, like the modernist narrative of progress—in particular progress through science. There is also, underlying many normative issues, the fundamental challenge (die {\"a}rgerliche Tatsache) of social order, as a value in its own right, and thus to be conserved, and/or as a constraint that needs to be opened up. This essential ambivalence of social order feeds into the discourse about innovation, which can be embraced as wonderful, or criticised as deviant and possibly dangerous (cf. Godin 2010). Issues thrown up by emerging technologies partake in this fundamental challenge, and are thus broader (and deeper) than questions of risk and other immediate effects on society. This is the first level of pervasiveness of normativity. One implication is that the achievements of ethics, ‘the rich and diverse work of the past 2,500 years of moral philosophy’ (Baggini and Fosl 2007: p. xvi), while considerable and to be built upon, cover only part of the articulations of normativity, in spite of the claim of ethicists that normativity is their special domain. I will discuss other articulations of normativity as in law, governance and sociology, and also consider ‘sites’ where pervasive normativity is visible. My own experience with constructive technology assessment (CTA) will be one such ‘site’",
    keywords = "Political theory, Moral luck, Responsible research and innovation, Moral labour",
    author = "Arie Rip",
    year = "2013",
    doi = "10.1057/9781137002938_11",
    language = "English",
    isbn = "978-1-349-43407-7",
    pages = "191--212",
    editor = "{van der Burg}, Simone and Tsjalling Swierstra",
    booktitle = "Ethics on the Laboratory Floor",
    publisher = "Palgrave Macmillan Ltd.",
    address = "United Kingdom",

    }

    Rip, A 2013, Pervasive Normativity and Emerging Technologies. in S van der Burg & T Swierstra (eds), Ethics on the Laboratory Floor. Palgrave Macmillan Ltd., London, pp. 191-212. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137002938_11

    Pervasive Normativity and Emerging Technologies. / Rip, Arie.

    Ethics on the Laboratory Floor. ed. / Simone van der Burg; Tsjalling Swierstra. London : Palgrave Macmillan Ltd., 2013. p. 191-212.

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterAcademicpeer-review

    TY - CHAP

    T1 - Pervasive Normativity and Emerging Technologies

    AU - Rip, Arie

    PY - 2013

    Y1 - 2013

    N2 - Normativity is everywhere. It is taken up in ethics, but also in law and political theory, and more implicitly in economics and sociology. And there is the de facto normativity of master narratives and imaginaries, like the modernist narrative of progress—in particular progress through science. There is also, underlying many normative issues, the fundamental challenge (die ärgerliche Tatsache) of social order, as a value in its own right, and thus to be conserved, and/or as a constraint that needs to be opened up. This essential ambivalence of social order feeds into the discourse about innovation, which can be embraced as wonderful, or criticised as deviant and possibly dangerous (cf. Godin 2010). Issues thrown up by emerging technologies partake in this fundamental challenge, and are thus broader (and deeper) than questions of risk and other immediate effects on society. This is the first level of pervasiveness of normativity. One implication is that the achievements of ethics, ‘the rich and diverse work of the past 2,500 years of moral philosophy’ (Baggini and Fosl 2007: p. xvi), while considerable and to be built upon, cover only part of the articulations of normativity, in spite of the claim of ethicists that normativity is their special domain. I will discuss other articulations of normativity as in law, governance and sociology, and also consider ‘sites’ where pervasive normativity is visible. My own experience with constructive technology assessment (CTA) will be one such ‘site’

    AB - Normativity is everywhere. It is taken up in ethics, but also in law and political theory, and more implicitly in economics and sociology. And there is the de facto normativity of master narratives and imaginaries, like the modernist narrative of progress—in particular progress through science. There is also, underlying many normative issues, the fundamental challenge (die ärgerliche Tatsache) of social order, as a value in its own right, and thus to be conserved, and/or as a constraint that needs to be opened up. This essential ambivalence of social order feeds into the discourse about innovation, which can be embraced as wonderful, or criticised as deviant and possibly dangerous (cf. Godin 2010). Issues thrown up by emerging technologies partake in this fundamental challenge, and are thus broader (and deeper) than questions of risk and other immediate effects on society. This is the first level of pervasiveness of normativity. One implication is that the achievements of ethics, ‘the rich and diverse work of the past 2,500 years of moral philosophy’ (Baggini and Fosl 2007: p. xvi), while considerable and to be built upon, cover only part of the articulations of normativity, in spite of the claim of ethicists that normativity is their special domain. I will discuss other articulations of normativity as in law, governance and sociology, and also consider ‘sites’ where pervasive normativity is visible. My own experience with constructive technology assessment (CTA) will be one such ‘site’

    KW - Political theory

    KW - Moral luck

    KW - Responsible research and innovation

    KW - Moral labour

    U2 - 10.1057/9781137002938_11

    DO - 10.1057/9781137002938_11

    M3 - Chapter

    SN - 978-1-349-43407-7

    SP - 191

    EP - 212

    BT - Ethics on the Laboratory Floor

    A2 - van der Burg, Simone

    A2 - Swierstra, Tsjalling

    PB - Palgrave Macmillan Ltd.

    CY - London

    ER -

    Rip A. Pervasive Normativity and Emerging Technologies. In van der Burg S, Swierstra T, editors, Ethics on the Laboratory Floor. London: Palgrave Macmillan Ltd. 2013. p. 191-212 https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137002938_11