Planning support for school admission: Towards equal opportunity for all – a case study in Florida

Lydia Marleny Prieto Leon*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: ThesisPhD Thesis - Research UT, graduation UT

90 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Inequalities in education are one of the major challenges of our time. It affects millions of children around the globe, but especially the most vulnerable and marginalized groups. Public school choice has become a key policy tool to battle inequality in access to schools. Despite improvements in both, the quality and availability of educational resources, it has been recognized that the school admission policy plays a crucial role in equally distributing opportunities. Some of the major obstacles to achieving equitable quality education are the lack of disaggregated data available regarding the current distribution of existing opportunities, reduced emphasis on the detection of disparities in the admission for particular groups, and the absence of a robust measurement toolset, i.e., a thermometer of fairness in the assignment practices for new schooling opportunities. It is surprising in view of these radically complex issues, that so little attention has been paid to the question of how admission to basic (K-12) public schools can be best assessed. The primary objective of this thesis is, therefore, to provide planning support tools to facilitate assessing the fairness of the admission policy. Using school admission data, we draw upon a case study from a specialty (magnet) middle school choice program, in a large, highly diverse, and representative school district in Florida, US, which had faced strong segregation issues in the past. Therefore, the results are based on empirical evidence. Three specific objectives were addressed.
The first objective focuses on the demand side, aiming to model student preferences, to determine the set of factors that influence how applicants choose among specialized public school choice programs. Our experiments reveal that Rank-Ordered Models (ROL) and Revealed Preferences (RP) data generate smaller standard errors in the estimations and deliver greater accuracy to identify choice behaviour patterns when compared with standard discrete choice models. The most remarkable finding is that applicants to specialized programs might tend to self-segregate by socioeconomic status; non-affluent applicants seem to prefer underprivileged schools; they prefer schools matching their family circumstances, including poverty status, race, and ethnicity. Such kind of choice behaviour in parents’ preferences is unfortunate; it would promote segregation, instead to diminish it.
The second objective focuses on the supply side, by analysing the admission criteria used by the school district to choose the students, and by measuring the inequality of opportunity, i.e., how closely an existing admission policy matches the equality of opportunity principle. Remarkably, our analysis opens up transparency, demonstrating that the Human Opportunity Index (HOI) methodology is capable to capture disparities in the selection by combining two terms: first, the coverage, i.e. the percentage of individuals who has access to the opportunity; and second, the distribution of school seats by groups of students of similar characteristics; even more valuable, the Shapley decomposition is able to determine the marginal contribution of each applicant’s life circumstances to Inequality of Opportunity (IOP). Our examination of the admission data from the case study showed that socioeconomic status and students’ race/ethnicity are the most important contributors to Inequality of Opportunity (IOP). However, the school district seems to be determined to help underprivileged children alleviate their personal circumstances, by giving priority in admission to applicants who are residing in poor neighbourhoods, and assigned to Title-I schools (with poor academic performance).
The third objective focuses on matching, aiming to develop a methodological framework that supports the definition of different scenarios and guides the assessment of school admission strategies. The framework has three main components: ranking, matching, and evaluating. The ranking component incorporates statistical techniques that capture the preferences from both sides of the market (students and schools) and uses a multicriteria decision analysis model to structure the decision-making process. The matching component is based on computational techniques that solve the student assignment problem by implementing several matching algorithms. The evaluating component is supported by a simulation engine that performs the allocation for several different scenarios, and a measuring toolset that determines ‘how good’ is the assignment from the point of view of the students and the schools.
We altered the admissions policy in three ways, changing first the school priority profiles, then changing the assignment algorithms, and last, changing the school capacities. The former variation generated the most remarkable impact. The HOI appears to work in wide-ranging synchronization with the number of school seats available and with family satisfaction about the choice school assigned: when the capacities are increased, the HOI performs close to the target values and provides higher parent welfare; when capacities are decreased, the HOI faces massive constraints, revealing values far from the target values, and simultaneously restricting parent welfare.
This study contributed to the discussion on how to monitor progress toward detecting inequalities in access to quality basic education. We revealed important constraints faced by school policy-makers when planning for school admission; we integrated views from three sides of the market -the supply, the demand, and the matching-; and we reflected on what the challenges are for reviewing and communicating these results. Although the HOI was established to place emphasis on detecting unfair access to opportunities, this study confirmed that the index is driven much more robustly by the coverage term than by the inequality term. This limits the usability of the index since schools are easily not able to remove capacity constraints.
The main conclusion of this work is that the methodological framework proposed for assessing fairness in school admission is a valuable planning support tool for policy making. It remains valid for application in similar case studies in the future, in the US and beyond. However, the evaluation component of the framework, which is supported by the HOI methodology needs further research. Other fairness metrics should be incorporated that overcome the HOI limitations, and that might provide further insights into the analysis of inequalities in education.



Original languageEnglish
QualificationDoctor of Philosophy
Awarding Institution
  • University of Twente
  • Faculty of Geo-Information Science and Earth Observation
Supervisors/Advisors
  • van Maarseveen, Martin, Supervisor
  • Flacke, Johannes, Co-Supervisor
  • Aguero-valverde, Jonathan, Co-Supervisor, External person
Award date5 Apr 2023
Place of PublicationEnschede
Publisher
Print ISBNs978-90-365-5515-9
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 6 Apr 2023

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Planning support for school admission: Towards equal opportunity for all – a case study in Florida'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this