Playing against abuse: Effects of procedural and narrative persuasive games

Ruud S. Jacobs, Jeroen Jansz, Julia Kneer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

27 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Persuasive games—games that intend to change attitudes in
players—employ numerous types of persuasive tactics; the individual
contributions of such tactics to the effectiveness of these games as a full
experience have not yet been tested. In this study we examine two existing
persuasive games about teen dating violence by performing a controlled
experiment on effects on attitudes towards abusive relationships. We
selected these games on the basis of their relative focus on narrative
or procedural arguments (i.e., mirroring real-world processes through ingame systems). Participants (N = 262) were drawn from a mixed sample
of university and senior secondary school students who, with a mean
age of 19 years, were slightly older than the game’s target audiences.
Results indicated that the games affected some of the attitudes they were
intended to, but that the effects of the narrative and procedural games
were not differentiated. Character and cognitive identification (with the
game’s protagonists and procedural rhetoric) differed between games, but
negatively predicted attitude change. We describe conclusions about how
game developers may comfortably explore multiple designs without fear of
hampering effects.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)97-120
Number of pages24
JournalJournal of Games, Self, & Society
Volume1
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2019

Fingerprint

abuse
attitude change
narrative
tactics
secondary school
rhetoric
violence
anxiety
university
student

Cite this

@article{4bed0ea161544b5cb3b5a4366a1273ee,
title = "Playing against abuse: Effects of procedural and narrative persuasive games",
abstract = "Persuasive games—games that intend to change attitudes inplayers—employ numerous types of persuasive tactics; the individualcontributions of such tactics to the effectiveness of these games as a fullexperience have not yet been tested. In this study we examine two existingpersuasive games about teen dating violence by performing a controlledexperiment on effects on attitudes towards abusive relationships. Weselected these games on the basis of their relative focus on narrativeor procedural arguments (i.e., mirroring real-world processes through ingame systems). Participants (N = 262) were drawn from a mixed sampleof university and senior secondary school students who, with a meanage of 19 years, were slightly older than the game’s target audiences.Results indicated that the games affected some of the attitudes they wereintended to, but that the effects of the narrative and procedural gameswere not differentiated. Character and cognitive identification (with thegame’s protagonists and procedural rhetoric) differed between games, butnegatively predicted attitude change. We describe conclusions about howgame developers may comfortably explore multiple designs without fear ofhampering effects.",
author = "Jacobs, {Ruud S.} and Jeroen Jansz and Julia Kneer",
year = "2019",
doi = "10.1184/R1/7857578",
language = "English",
volume = "1",
pages = "97--120",
journal = "Journal of Games, Self, & Society",
issn = "2641-9785",
publisher = "ETC",
number = "1",

}

Playing against abuse : Effects of procedural and narrative persuasive games. / Jacobs, Ruud S.; Jansz, Jeroen; Kneer, Julia.

In: Journal of Games, Self, & Society, Vol. 1, No. 1, 2019, p. 97-120.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Playing against abuse

T2 - Effects of procedural and narrative persuasive games

AU - Jacobs, Ruud S.

AU - Jansz, Jeroen

AU - Kneer, Julia

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

N2 - Persuasive games—games that intend to change attitudes inplayers—employ numerous types of persuasive tactics; the individualcontributions of such tactics to the effectiveness of these games as a fullexperience have not yet been tested. In this study we examine two existingpersuasive games about teen dating violence by performing a controlledexperiment on effects on attitudes towards abusive relationships. Weselected these games on the basis of their relative focus on narrativeor procedural arguments (i.e., mirroring real-world processes through ingame systems). Participants (N = 262) were drawn from a mixed sampleof university and senior secondary school students who, with a meanage of 19 years, were slightly older than the game’s target audiences.Results indicated that the games affected some of the attitudes they wereintended to, but that the effects of the narrative and procedural gameswere not differentiated. Character and cognitive identification (with thegame’s protagonists and procedural rhetoric) differed between games, butnegatively predicted attitude change. We describe conclusions about howgame developers may comfortably explore multiple designs without fear ofhampering effects.

AB - Persuasive games—games that intend to change attitudes inplayers—employ numerous types of persuasive tactics; the individualcontributions of such tactics to the effectiveness of these games as a fullexperience have not yet been tested. In this study we examine two existingpersuasive games about teen dating violence by performing a controlledexperiment on effects on attitudes towards abusive relationships. Weselected these games on the basis of their relative focus on narrativeor procedural arguments (i.e., mirroring real-world processes through ingame systems). Participants (N = 262) were drawn from a mixed sampleof university and senior secondary school students who, with a meanage of 19 years, were slightly older than the game’s target audiences.Results indicated that the games affected some of the attitudes they wereintended to, but that the effects of the narrative and procedural gameswere not differentiated. Character and cognitive identification (with thegame’s protagonists and procedural rhetoric) differed between games, butnegatively predicted attitude change. We describe conclusions about howgame developers may comfortably explore multiple designs without fear ofhampering effects.

U2 - 10.1184/R1/7857578

DO - 10.1184/R1/7857578

M3 - Article

VL - 1

SP - 97

EP - 120

JO - Journal of Games, Self, & Society

JF - Journal of Games, Self, & Society

SN - 2641-9785

IS - 1

ER -