Policy Making for Environmental Innovations

Yoram Krozer, A. Nentjes

    Research output: Contribution to conferencePaperAcademic

    8 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    The instrument theory is reviewed with attention to the effects of policy instrument on technology development. The effects policy instruments on innovations are discussed vis-à-vis the empirical findings. The instrument theory linked with the innovation theory to assess the conditions that are favourable for environmental innovations. It is argued that innovators must spend a lot of money to demonstrate a new technology and then wait 6 to 8 years until authorities finish the policy preparation and start with the implementation of stricter demands. The innovators are uncertain during the waiting time about the demands and the speed of implementation. The uncertainties reduce the present value of the revenues from sales of technology, thus investments in innovations become unattractive. It is shown that strict environmental demands and type policy instruments, though relevant, have less impact than the duration of and uncertainty about policy preparation and enforcement. The market-based instruments are advantageous in comparison with the direct regulations because they create a larger market for the innovations, but the waiting time can be very long because of resistance to this type of instruments, whereas covenants create less market volume, but entail a shorter waiting time, so they be effective in combination with liabilities, penalties, bonds etc. The conditions for innovations are: short preparation period of environmental demands with clear aims for emission reduction and assurance about enforcement of the demands, based on the policy instruments that provide freedom to anticipate the demands.
    Original languageEnglish
    Number of pages29
    Publication statusPublished - 10 Nov 2004
    Event12th Greening of Industry Network Conference, GIN 2004: Partnerships for Sustainable Development - Hong Kong, Hong Kong
    Duration: 7 Nov 200410 Nov 2004
    Conference number: 12

    Conference

    Conference12th Greening of Industry Network Conference, GIN 2004
    Abbreviated titleGIN
    CountryHong Kong
    CityHong Kong
    Period7/11/0410/11/04

    Fingerprint

    policy making
    innovation
    market
    technological development
    liability
    demand
    policy instrument

    Cite this

    Krozer, Y., & Nentjes, A. (2004). Policy Making for Environmental Innovations. Paper presented at 12th Greening of Industry Network Conference, GIN 2004, Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
    Krozer, Yoram ; Nentjes, A. / Policy Making for Environmental Innovations. Paper presented at 12th Greening of Industry Network Conference, GIN 2004, Hong Kong, Hong Kong.29 p.
    @conference{9d1126198ffb4cbba05956f31220020c,
    title = "Policy Making for Environmental Innovations",
    abstract = "The instrument theory is reviewed with attention to the effects of policy instrument on technology development. The effects policy instruments on innovations are discussed vis-{\`a}-vis the empirical findings. The instrument theory linked with the innovation theory to assess the conditions that are favourable for environmental innovations. It is argued that innovators must spend a lot of money to demonstrate a new technology and then wait 6 to 8 years until authorities finish the policy preparation and start with the implementation of stricter demands. The innovators are uncertain during the waiting time about the demands and the speed of implementation. The uncertainties reduce the present value of the revenues from sales of technology, thus investments in innovations become unattractive. It is shown that strict environmental demands and type policy instruments, though relevant, have less impact than the duration of and uncertainty about policy preparation and enforcement. The market-based instruments are advantageous in comparison with the direct regulations because they create a larger market for the innovations, but the waiting time can be very long because of resistance to this type of instruments, whereas covenants create less market volume, but entail a shorter waiting time, so they be effective in combination with liabilities, penalties, bonds etc. The conditions for innovations are: short preparation period of environmental demands with clear aims for emission reduction and assurance about enforcement of the demands, based on the policy instruments that provide freedom to anticipate the demands.",
    author = "Yoram Krozer and A. Nentjes",
    year = "2004",
    month = "11",
    day = "10",
    language = "English",
    note = "12th Greening of Industry Network Conference, GIN 2004 : Partnerships for Sustainable Development, GIN ; Conference date: 07-11-2004 Through 10-11-2004",

    }

    Krozer, Y & Nentjes, A 2004, 'Policy Making for Environmental Innovations' Paper presented at 12th Greening of Industry Network Conference, GIN 2004, Hong Kong, Hong Kong, 7/11/04 - 10/11/04, .

    Policy Making for Environmental Innovations. / Krozer, Yoram ; Nentjes, A.

    2004. Paper presented at 12th Greening of Industry Network Conference, GIN 2004, Hong Kong, Hong Kong.

    Research output: Contribution to conferencePaperAcademic

    TY - CONF

    T1 - Policy Making for Environmental Innovations

    AU - Krozer, Yoram

    AU - Nentjes, A.

    PY - 2004/11/10

    Y1 - 2004/11/10

    N2 - The instrument theory is reviewed with attention to the effects of policy instrument on technology development. The effects policy instruments on innovations are discussed vis-à-vis the empirical findings. The instrument theory linked with the innovation theory to assess the conditions that are favourable for environmental innovations. It is argued that innovators must spend a lot of money to demonstrate a new technology and then wait 6 to 8 years until authorities finish the policy preparation and start with the implementation of stricter demands. The innovators are uncertain during the waiting time about the demands and the speed of implementation. The uncertainties reduce the present value of the revenues from sales of technology, thus investments in innovations become unattractive. It is shown that strict environmental demands and type policy instruments, though relevant, have less impact than the duration of and uncertainty about policy preparation and enforcement. The market-based instruments are advantageous in comparison with the direct regulations because they create a larger market for the innovations, but the waiting time can be very long because of resistance to this type of instruments, whereas covenants create less market volume, but entail a shorter waiting time, so they be effective in combination with liabilities, penalties, bonds etc. The conditions for innovations are: short preparation period of environmental demands with clear aims for emission reduction and assurance about enforcement of the demands, based on the policy instruments that provide freedom to anticipate the demands.

    AB - The instrument theory is reviewed with attention to the effects of policy instrument on technology development. The effects policy instruments on innovations are discussed vis-à-vis the empirical findings. The instrument theory linked with the innovation theory to assess the conditions that are favourable for environmental innovations. It is argued that innovators must spend a lot of money to demonstrate a new technology and then wait 6 to 8 years until authorities finish the policy preparation and start with the implementation of stricter demands. The innovators are uncertain during the waiting time about the demands and the speed of implementation. The uncertainties reduce the present value of the revenues from sales of technology, thus investments in innovations become unattractive. It is shown that strict environmental demands and type policy instruments, though relevant, have less impact than the duration of and uncertainty about policy preparation and enforcement. The market-based instruments are advantageous in comparison with the direct regulations because they create a larger market for the innovations, but the waiting time can be very long because of resistance to this type of instruments, whereas covenants create less market volume, but entail a shorter waiting time, so they be effective in combination with liabilities, penalties, bonds etc. The conditions for innovations are: short preparation period of environmental demands with clear aims for emission reduction and assurance about enforcement of the demands, based on the policy instruments that provide freedom to anticipate the demands.

    M3 - Paper

    ER -

    Krozer Y, Nentjes A. Policy Making for Environmental Innovations. 2004. Paper presented at 12th Greening of Industry Network Conference, GIN 2004, Hong Kong, Hong Kong.