Policy-making for structural reforms in Welsh higher education landscape

Research output: Working paperProfessional

38 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

In this working paper we present an analysis of the merger process in Wales in the period from 2002-2012. The mergers were initiated to reduce the overall number of universities as part of an effort to increase the overall competiveness of the Welsh higher education system in the wider United Kingdom higher education system. The Welsh merger structural reforms have been analysed by using a governance approach to HE mergers. The aim is to understand whether the structural reform process can be understood as functioning as an open method of co-ordination. The OMC can provide a conceptualization of bottom-up driven merger processes. This is certainly the case for countries like the UK where universities have high levels of institutional autonomy. Various elements of the OMC approach can be detected in Welsh merger reforms. The structural reforms provided for strong co-ordination and also strong initiative taken by the universities themselves. It is difficult to determine whether the co-ordinated mergers have been successful. On the one hand, it reduced the overall number of universities. The capacity of the system has improved and the average size of the institutions has increased. On the other hand, the desired end point of six institutions has not been met and the average size of the institutions remains relatively low in the UK context.
Original languageEnglish
PublisherCenter for Higher Education Policy Studies (CHEPS)
Number of pages27
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2017

Publication series

NameCHEPS working paper series
PublisherCHEPS
No.02
Volume2017
ISSN (Electronic)2589-9716

Fingerprint

structural reform
merger
education
university
education system
open method of coordination
autonomy
governance
reform

Keywords

  • IR-104030

Cite this

Benneworth, P. S., & Zeeman, N. (2017). Policy-making for structural reforms in Welsh higher education landscape. (CHEPS working paper series; Vol. 2017, No. 02). Center for Higher Education Policy Studies (CHEPS). https://doi.org/10.3990/4.2589-9716.2017.02
Benneworth, Paul Stephen ; Zeeman, Nadine. / Policy-making for structural reforms in Welsh higher education landscape. Center for Higher Education Policy Studies (CHEPS), 2017. (CHEPS working paper series; 02).
@techreport{b67c0fa0f3d044bdbc481d6243ebd744,
title = "Policy-making for structural reforms in Welsh higher education landscape",
abstract = "In this working paper we present an analysis of the merger process in Wales in the period from 2002-2012. The mergers were initiated to reduce the overall number of universities as part of an effort to increase the overall competiveness of the Welsh higher education system in the wider United Kingdom higher education system. The Welsh merger structural reforms have been analysed by using a governance approach to HE mergers. The aim is to understand whether the structural reform process can be understood as functioning as an open method of co-ordination. The OMC can provide a conceptualization of bottom-up driven merger processes. This is certainly the case for countries like the UK where universities have high levels of institutional autonomy. Various elements of the OMC approach can be detected in Welsh merger reforms. The structural reforms provided for strong co-ordination and also strong initiative taken by the universities themselves. It is difficult to determine whether the co-ordinated mergers have been successful. On the one hand, it reduced the overall number of universities. The capacity of the system has improved and the average size of the institutions has increased. On the other hand, the desired end point of six institutions has not been met and the average size of the institutions remains relatively low in the UK context.",
keywords = "IR-104030",
author = "Benneworth, {Paul Stephen} and Nadine Zeeman",
year = "2017",
doi = "10.3990/4.2589-9716.2017.02",
language = "English",
series = "CHEPS working paper series",
publisher = "Center for Higher Education Policy Studies (CHEPS)",
number = "02",
address = "Netherlands",
type = "WorkingPaper",
institution = "Center for Higher Education Policy Studies (CHEPS)",

}

Benneworth, PS & Zeeman, N 2017 'Policy-making for structural reforms in Welsh higher education landscape' CHEPS working paper series, no. 02, vol. 2017, Center for Higher Education Policy Studies (CHEPS). https://doi.org/10.3990/4.2589-9716.2017.02

Policy-making for structural reforms in Welsh higher education landscape. / Benneworth, Paul Stephen; Zeeman, Nadine.

Center for Higher Education Policy Studies (CHEPS), 2017. (CHEPS working paper series; Vol. 2017, No. 02).

Research output: Working paperProfessional

TY - UNPB

T1 - Policy-making for structural reforms in Welsh higher education landscape

AU - Benneworth, Paul Stephen

AU - Zeeman, Nadine

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - In this working paper we present an analysis of the merger process in Wales in the period from 2002-2012. The mergers were initiated to reduce the overall number of universities as part of an effort to increase the overall competiveness of the Welsh higher education system in the wider United Kingdom higher education system. The Welsh merger structural reforms have been analysed by using a governance approach to HE mergers. The aim is to understand whether the structural reform process can be understood as functioning as an open method of co-ordination. The OMC can provide a conceptualization of bottom-up driven merger processes. This is certainly the case for countries like the UK where universities have high levels of institutional autonomy. Various elements of the OMC approach can be detected in Welsh merger reforms. The structural reforms provided for strong co-ordination and also strong initiative taken by the universities themselves. It is difficult to determine whether the co-ordinated mergers have been successful. On the one hand, it reduced the overall number of universities. The capacity of the system has improved and the average size of the institutions has increased. On the other hand, the desired end point of six institutions has not been met and the average size of the institutions remains relatively low in the UK context.

AB - In this working paper we present an analysis of the merger process in Wales in the period from 2002-2012. The mergers were initiated to reduce the overall number of universities as part of an effort to increase the overall competiveness of the Welsh higher education system in the wider United Kingdom higher education system. The Welsh merger structural reforms have been analysed by using a governance approach to HE mergers. The aim is to understand whether the structural reform process can be understood as functioning as an open method of co-ordination. The OMC can provide a conceptualization of bottom-up driven merger processes. This is certainly the case for countries like the UK where universities have high levels of institutional autonomy. Various elements of the OMC approach can be detected in Welsh merger reforms. The structural reforms provided for strong co-ordination and also strong initiative taken by the universities themselves. It is difficult to determine whether the co-ordinated mergers have been successful. On the one hand, it reduced the overall number of universities. The capacity of the system has improved and the average size of the institutions has increased. On the other hand, the desired end point of six institutions has not been met and the average size of the institutions remains relatively low in the UK context.

KW - IR-104030

U2 - 10.3990/4.2589-9716.2017.02

DO - 10.3990/4.2589-9716.2017.02

M3 - Working paper

T3 - CHEPS working paper series

BT - Policy-making for structural reforms in Welsh higher education landscape

PB - Center for Higher Education Policy Studies (CHEPS)

ER -

Benneworth PS, Zeeman N. Policy-making for structural reforms in Welsh higher education landscape. Center for Higher Education Policy Studies (CHEPS). 2017. (CHEPS working paper series; 02). https://doi.org/10.3990/4.2589-9716.2017.02