Abstract
Ambulatory estimation of gait and balance parameters requires knowledge of relative feet and centre of mass (CoM) positions. Inertial measurement units (IMU)
placed on each foot, and on the pelvis are useful in tracking these segments over time, but cannot track the relative distances between these segments. Further, drift due to strapdown inertial navigation results in erroneous relative estimates of feet and CoM positions after a few steps. In this study,we track the relative distances using the assumptions of the Centroidal Moment Pivot (CMP) theory. An Extended Kalman filter approach was used to fuse information from different sources: strapdown inertial navigation, commonly used constraints such as zero velocity updates, and relative segment distances from the CMP assumption; to eventually track relative feet and CoM positions. These estimates were expressed in a reference frame defined by the heading of each step. The validity of this approach was tested on variable gait. The step lengths and step widths were estimated with an average absolute error of 4.6±1.5cmand3.8±1.5cm respectively when compared against the reference VICON. Additionally, we validated the relative distances of the feet and the CoM, and further, show that the approach proves useful in identifying asymmetric gait patterns.We conclude that a three IMU approach is feasible as a portable gait lab for ambulatory measurement of foot and CoM positions in daily life.
placed on each foot, and on the pelvis are useful in tracking these segments over time, but cannot track the relative distances between these segments. Further, drift due to strapdown inertial navigation results in erroneous relative estimates of feet and CoM positions after a few steps. In this study,we track the relative distances using the assumptions of the Centroidal Moment Pivot (CMP) theory. An Extended Kalman filter approach was used to fuse information from different sources: strapdown inertial navigation, commonly used constraints such as zero velocity updates, and relative segment distances from the CMP assumption; to eventually track relative feet and CoM positions. These estimates were expressed in a reference frame defined by the heading of each step. The validity of this approach was tested on variable gait. The step lengths and step widths were estimated with an average absolute error of 4.6±1.5cmand3.8±1.5cm respectively when compared against the reference VICON. Additionally, we validated the relative distances of the feet and the CoM, and further, show that the approach proves useful in identifying asymmetric gait patterns.We conclude that a three IMU approach is feasible as a portable gait lab for ambulatory measurement of foot and CoM positions in daily life.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Article number | 9171861 |
Pages (from-to) | 2255-2264 |
Number of pages | 10 |
Journal | IEEE transactions on neural systems and rehabilitation engineering |
Volume | 28 |
Issue number | 10 |
Early online date | 20 Aug 2020 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Oct 2020 |
Keywords
- Inertial measurement unit
- gait analysis
- step length
- relative feet distance
- CoM kinematics