Positive psychological coaching tools and techniques: A systematic review and classification

Stefanie Richter, Llewellyn Ellardus van Zyl, Lara C. Roll, Marius W. Stander

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

5 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Positive psychological coaching (PPC) has emerged as a popular “paradigm” for practitioners interested in the professional development of people. A recent review consolidated the literature on PPC and produced a 5-phase positive psychological coaching model aimed at facilitating professional growth. However, little is known about practically operationalizing each phase of the coaching process (i.e how to facilitate each phase and which underlying tools and techniques could be employed). This systematic review aims at a) determining which coaching tools and techniques are proposed within the coaching literature and b) classifying the identified tools and techniques into the respective phases of PPCM. The investigation used a two-step approach by conducting a systematic literature review followed by an iterative heuristic classification process. The systematic literature review resulted in 24 peer-reviewed publications on positive psychological coaching providing 117 different coaching tools that could be condensed into 18 overarching coaching techniques. The iterative process showed that most techniques and tools are useful in at least two phases. Interestingly, experts still vary in opinion on the timing and application of these specific techniques and tools within the positive psychological coaching process.
Original languageEnglish
JournalPLoS ONE
Publication statusSubmitted - 1 Jan 2021

Keywords

  • Positive Psychological Coaching
  • Positive Psychological Tools
  • Positive Psychological Techniques
  • Positive Psychological Interventions
  • Strengths Based Coachin

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Positive psychological coaching tools and techniques: A systematic review and classification'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this