Practices in timetabling in higher education institutions: A systematic review

R. Oude Vrielink (Corresponding Author), E.A. Jansen, E.W. Hans, J. van Hillegersberg

Research output: Contribution to journalConference articleAcademicpeer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)
121 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The study of differences between timetabling research presented in conferences like PATAT or published in Annals of OR and commercial timetabling software used in Higher Education Institutions (HEIs) is essential for the discussion about innovation in both higher education and in commerce. In the field of planning and scheduling, a lot of developments are made and it is important to recognise that these developments are of influence on HEIs through their use of timetabling software. A main objective of the work presented here is to provide up-to-date information about timetabling in HEIs and see to what extent they adopt and implement timetabling developments. This is crucial because of budgets of institutions being strictly limited and remaining resources like rooms having to be shared more and more. Developments in HEIs have caused planning processes in higher education to deal with more limitations than ever, while at the same time the demand towards flexibility and availability is increasing. This paper gives the results of a systematic literature review in which differences and similarities in theory and practice of timetabling in higher education are described and discussed. We looked at state-of-the-art timetabling research for HEIs, at innovations in the field of timetabling and at changing requirements in Higher Education. The aim of this paper is to motivate the discussion about both the differences and similarities and bring timetabling application development closer to educational requirements.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)145-160
JournalAnnals of operations research
Volume275
Issue number1
Early online date27 Oct 2017
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2019
Event11th International Conference on the Practice and Theory of Automated Timetabling, PATAT 2016 - Udine, Italy
Duration: 23 Aug 201626 Aug 2016
Conference number: 11
http://www.patatconference.org/patat2016/

Fingerprint

Timetabling
Higher education institutions
Systematic review
Innovation
Software
Education
Commerce
Planning and scheduling
Planning process
Resources
Literature review

Keywords

  • Education logistics
  • Governance
  • Higher education
  • Timetabling
  • Timetabling algorithms

Cite this

@article{9cd0e304b0704504a7b2e32b19619f55,
title = "Practices in timetabling in higher education institutions: A systematic review",
abstract = "The study of differences between timetabling research presented in conferences like PATAT or published in Annals of OR and commercial timetabling software used in Higher Education Institutions (HEIs) is essential for the discussion about innovation in both higher education and in commerce. In the field of planning and scheduling, a lot of developments are made and it is important to recognise that these developments are of influence on HEIs through their use of timetabling software. A main objective of the work presented here is to provide up-to-date information about timetabling in HEIs and see to what extent they adopt and implement timetabling developments. This is crucial because of budgets of institutions being strictly limited and remaining resources like rooms having to be shared more and more. Developments in HEIs have caused planning processes in higher education to deal with more limitations than ever, while at the same time the demand towards flexibility and availability is increasing. This paper gives the results of a systematic literature review in which differences and similarities in theory and practice of timetabling in higher education are described and discussed. We looked at state-of-the-art timetabling research for HEIs, at innovations in the field of timetabling and at changing requirements in Higher Education. The aim of this paper is to motivate the discussion about both the differences and similarities and bring timetabling application development closer to educational requirements.",
keywords = "Education logistics, Governance, Higher education, Timetabling, Timetabling algorithms",
author = "{Oude Vrielink}, R. and E.A. Jansen and E.W. Hans and {van Hillegersberg}, J.",
note = "Special issue: PATAT 2016",
year = "2019",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1007/s10479-017-2688-8",
language = "English",
volume = "275",
pages = "145--160",
journal = "Annals of operations research",
issn = "0254-5330",
publisher = "Springer",
number = "1",

}

Practices in timetabling in higher education institutions : A systematic review. / Oude Vrielink, R. (Corresponding Author); Jansen, E.A.; Hans, E.W.; van Hillegersberg, J.

In: Annals of operations research, Vol. 275, No. 1, 04.2019, p. 145-160.

Research output: Contribution to journalConference articleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Practices in timetabling in higher education institutions

T2 - A systematic review

AU - Oude Vrielink, R.

AU - Jansen, E.A.

AU - Hans, E.W.

AU - van Hillegersberg, J.

N1 - Special issue: PATAT 2016

PY - 2019/4

Y1 - 2019/4

N2 - The study of differences between timetabling research presented in conferences like PATAT or published in Annals of OR and commercial timetabling software used in Higher Education Institutions (HEIs) is essential for the discussion about innovation in both higher education and in commerce. In the field of planning and scheduling, a lot of developments are made and it is important to recognise that these developments are of influence on HEIs through their use of timetabling software. A main objective of the work presented here is to provide up-to-date information about timetabling in HEIs and see to what extent they adopt and implement timetabling developments. This is crucial because of budgets of institutions being strictly limited and remaining resources like rooms having to be shared more and more. Developments in HEIs have caused planning processes in higher education to deal with more limitations than ever, while at the same time the demand towards flexibility and availability is increasing. This paper gives the results of a systematic literature review in which differences and similarities in theory and practice of timetabling in higher education are described and discussed. We looked at state-of-the-art timetabling research for HEIs, at innovations in the field of timetabling and at changing requirements in Higher Education. The aim of this paper is to motivate the discussion about both the differences and similarities and bring timetabling application development closer to educational requirements.

AB - The study of differences between timetabling research presented in conferences like PATAT or published in Annals of OR and commercial timetabling software used in Higher Education Institutions (HEIs) is essential for the discussion about innovation in both higher education and in commerce. In the field of planning and scheduling, a lot of developments are made and it is important to recognise that these developments are of influence on HEIs through their use of timetabling software. A main objective of the work presented here is to provide up-to-date information about timetabling in HEIs and see to what extent they adopt and implement timetabling developments. This is crucial because of budgets of institutions being strictly limited and remaining resources like rooms having to be shared more and more. Developments in HEIs have caused planning processes in higher education to deal with more limitations than ever, while at the same time the demand towards flexibility and availability is increasing. This paper gives the results of a systematic literature review in which differences and similarities in theory and practice of timetabling in higher education are described and discussed. We looked at state-of-the-art timetabling research for HEIs, at innovations in the field of timetabling and at changing requirements in Higher Education. The aim of this paper is to motivate the discussion about both the differences and similarities and bring timetabling application development closer to educational requirements.

KW - Education logistics

KW - Governance

KW - Higher education

KW - Timetabling

KW - Timetabling algorithms

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85032496276&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10479-017-2688-8

DO - 10.1007/s10479-017-2688-8

M3 - Conference article

VL - 275

SP - 145

EP - 160

JO - Annals of operations research

JF - Annals of operations research

SN - 0254-5330

IS - 1

ER -