Practices of Responsible Research and Innovation: A Review

Mirjam J. Schuijff, Anne Dijkstra*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

This paper presents results of a systematic literature review of RRI practices which aimed to gather insights to further both the theoretical and practical development of RRI. Analysing practices of RRI and mapping out main approaches as well as the values, dimensions or characteristics pursued with those practices, can add to understanding of the more conceptual discussions of RRI and enhance the academic debate. The results, based on a corpus of 52 articles, show that practices already reflect the rich variety of values, dimensions and characteristics provided in the main definitions in use, although not all are addressed yet. In fact, articles dealing with uptake of RRI practices may be improved by including more methodological information. RRI practices may further the conceptual debate by including more reflection, and these may foster mutual responsiveness between theory and practice by early anticipating impacts.
Original languageEnglish
Number of pages42
JournalScience and engineering ethics
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print/First online - 16 Dec 2019

Fingerprint

Innovation
innovation
Research
Values
Responsiveness
Literature review

Keywords

  • UT-Hybrid-D

Cite this

@article{8b543b159a234b9c8d3dbc63e5518c2b,
title = "Practices of Responsible Research and Innovation: A Review",
abstract = "This paper presents results of a systematic literature review of RRI practices which aimed to gather insights to further both the theoretical and practical development of RRI. Analysing practices of RRI and mapping out main approaches as well as the values, dimensions or characteristics pursued with those practices, can add to understanding of the more conceptual discussions of RRI and enhance the academic debate. The results, based on a corpus of 52 articles, show that practices already reflect the rich variety of values, dimensions and characteristics provided in the main definitions in use, although not all are addressed yet. In fact, articles dealing with uptake of RRI practices may be improved by including more methodological information. RRI practices may further the conceptual debate by including more reflection, and these may foster mutual responsiveness between theory and practice by early anticipating impacts.",
keywords = "UT-Hybrid-D",
author = "Schuijff, {Mirjam J.} and Anne Dijkstra",
note = "Springer deal",
year = "2019",
month = "12",
day = "16",
doi = "10.1007/s11948-019-00167-3",
language = "English",
journal = "Science and engineering ethics",
issn = "1353-3452",
publisher = "Springer",

}

Practices of Responsible Research and Innovation: A Review. / Schuijff, Mirjam J.; Dijkstra, Anne.

In: Science and engineering ethics, 16.12.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Practices of Responsible Research and Innovation: A Review

AU - Schuijff, Mirjam J.

AU - Dijkstra, Anne

N1 - Springer deal

PY - 2019/12/16

Y1 - 2019/12/16

N2 - This paper presents results of a systematic literature review of RRI practices which aimed to gather insights to further both the theoretical and practical development of RRI. Analysing practices of RRI and mapping out main approaches as well as the values, dimensions or characteristics pursued with those practices, can add to understanding of the more conceptual discussions of RRI and enhance the academic debate. The results, based on a corpus of 52 articles, show that practices already reflect the rich variety of values, dimensions and characteristics provided in the main definitions in use, although not all are addressed yet. In fact, articles dealing with uptake of RRI practices may be improved by including more methodological information. RRI practices may further the conceptual debate by including more reflection, and these may foster mutual responsiveness between theory and practice by early anticipating impacts.

AB - This paper presents results of a systematic literature review of RRI practices which aimed to gather insights to further both the theoretical and practical development of RRI. Analysing practices of RRI and mapping out main approaches as well as the values, dimensions or characteristics pursued with those practices, can add to understanding of the more conceptual discussions of RRI and enhance the academic debate. The results, based on a corpus of 52 articles, show that practices already reflect the rich variety of values, dimensions and characteristics provided in the main definitions in use, although not all are addressed yet. In fact, articles dealing with uptake of RRI practices may be improved by including more methodological information. RRI practices may further the conceptual debate by including more reflection, and these may foster mutual responsiveness between theory and practice by early anticipating impacts.

KW - UT-Hybrid-D

U2 - 10.1007/s11948-019-00167-3

DO - 10.1007/s11948-019-00167-3

M3 - Article

JO - Science and engineering ethics

JF - Science and engineering ethics

SN - 1353-3452

ER -