TY - JOUR
T1 - Predicting neurological outcome in comatose patients after cardiac arrest with multiscale deep neural networks
AU - Zheng, Wei Long
AU - Amorim, Edilberto
AU - Jing, Jin
AU - Ge, Wendong
AU - Hong, Shenda
AU - Wu, Ona
AU - Ghassemi, Mohammad
AU - Lee, Jong Woo
AU - Sivaraju, Adithya
AU - Pang, Trudy
AU - Herman, Susan T.
AU - Gaspard, Nicolas
AU - Ruijter, Barry J.
AU - Sun, Jimeng
AU - Tjepkema-Cloostermans, Marleen C.
AU - Hofmeijer, Jeannette
AU - van Putten, Michel J.A.M.
AU - Westover, M. Brandon
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was supported in part by grants from NIH-NINDS (1K23NS090900, 1K23NS119794, 1R01NS102190, 1R01NS102574, 1R01NS107291, T32HL007901, T90DA22759, T32EB001680, 1K23NS119794), American Heart Association (postdoctoral fellowship and 20CDA35310297), Neurocritical Care Society (NCS research training fellowship), Society of Critical Care Medicine-Weil research grant, CURE Epilepsy Foundation (Taking Flight Award), Massachusetts Institute of Technology-Philips Clinician Award, and the Dutch Epilepsy Fund (Epilepsiefonds; NEF 14-18).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 Elsevier B.V.
PY - 2021/12
Y1 - 2021/12
N2 - Objective: Electroencephalography (EEG) is an important tool for neurological outcome prediction after cardiac arrest. However, the complexity of continuous EEG data limits timely and accurate interpretation by clinicians. We develop a deep neural network (DNN) model to leverage complex EEG trends for early and accurate assessment of cardiac arrest coma recovery likelihood. Methods: We developed a multiscale DNN combining convolutional neural networks (CNN) and recurrent neural networks (long short-term memory [LSTM]) using EEG and demographic information (age, gender, shockable rhythm) from a multicenter cohort of 1,038 cardiac arrest patients. The CNN learns EEG feature representations while the multiscale LSTM captures short-term and long-term EEG dynamics on multiple time scales. Poor outcome is defined as a Cerebral Performance Category (CPC) score of 3-5 and good outcome as CPC score 1-2 at 3-6 months after cardiac arrest. Performance is evaluated using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and calibration error. Results: Model performance increased with EEG duration, with AUC increasing from 0.83 (95% Confidence Interval [CI] 0.79-0.87 at 12h to 0.91 (95%CI 0.88-0.93) at 66h. Sensitivity of good and poor outcome prediction was 77% and 75% at a specificity of 90%, respectively. Sensitivity of poor outcome was 50% at a specificity of 99%. Predicted probability was well matched to the observation frequency of poor outcomes, with a calibration error of 0.11 [0.09-0.14]. Conclusions: These results demonstrate that incorporating EEG evolution over time improves the accuracy of neurologic outcome prediction for patients with coma after cardiac arrest.
AB - Objective: Electroencephalography (EEG) is an important tool for neurological outcome prediction after cardiac arrest. However, the complexity of continuous EEG data limits timely and accurate interpretation by clinicians. We develop a deep neural network (DNN) model to leverage complex EEG trends for early and accurate assessment of cardiac arrest coma recovery likelihood. Methods: We developed a multiscale DNN combining convolutional neural networks (CNN) and recurrent neural networks (long short-term memory [LSTM]) using EEG and demographic information (age, gender, shockable rhythm) from a multicenter cohort of 1,038 cardiac arrest patients. The CNN learns EEG feature representations while the multiscale LSTM captures short-term and long-term EEG dynamics on multiple time scales. Poor outcome is defined as a Cerebral Performance Category (CPC) score of 3-5 and good outcome as CPC score 1-2 at 3-6 months after cardiac arrest. Performance is evaluated using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and calibration error. Results: Model performance increased with EEG duration, with AUC increasing from 0.83 (95% Confidence Interval [CI] 0.79-0.87 at 12h to 0.91 (95%CI 0.88-0.93) at 66h. Sensitivity of good and poor outcome prediction was 77% and 75% at a specificity of 90%, respectively. Sensitivity of poor outcome was 50% at a specificity of 99%. Predicted probability was well matched to the observation frequency of poor outcomes, with a calibration error of 0.11 [0.09-0.14]. Conclusions: These results demonstrate that incorporating EEG evolution over time improves the accuracy of neurologic outcome prediction for patients with coma after cardiac arrest.
KW - Cardiac arrest
KW - Deep learning
KW - EEG
KW - Machine learning
KW - Neurological outcome
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85118597335&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2021.10.034
DO - 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2021.10.034
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85118597335
VL - 169
SP - 86
EP - 94
JO - Resuscitation
JF - Resuscitation
SN - 0300-9572
ER -