Pressure or Pamper? The Effects of Power and Trust Dimensions on Supplier Resource Allocation

Niels Jaring Pulles, Jasper Veldman, Holger Schiele, Henk Sierksma

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

50 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Leveraging the supply chain for competitive resources remains a key challenge for supply chain management. Drawing on social exchange theory, this study examines SCM practices that help firms to acquire better supplier resources than rival firms that source from the same supplier. We provide a clearer picture of coercive and competence power, and goodwill and competence trust as key mechanisms to improve supplier resource allocation of physical and innovation resources. We analyze survey data of 185 supplying firms using structural equation modeling. Our analyses yield several interesting findings. First, contrary to other studies we find that coercive tactics do not necessarily affect supplier resource allocation negatively and goodwill trust does not inherently affect supplier resource allocation positively. Second, the results of a multigroup analysis indicate that the dependence of a supplier on the buying firm – in terms of share in turnover – affects the relationship between the trust dimensions and supplier resource allocation more than it does the power dimensions. Third, goodwill trust only affects supplier resource allocation when the buyer has a large share in the supplier's turnover, while competence trust is more effective if buyers account for a small share in the supplier's turnover. The contributions of our study for the supply chain management and social exchange theory literature are discussed
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)16-36
JournalJournal of supply chain management
Volume50
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 28 Apr 2014

Fingerprint

Resource allocation
Supply chain management
Supply chains
Innovation
Suppliers

Keywords

  • METIS-303394
  • IR-90530

Cite this

Pulles, Niels Jaring ; Veldman, Jasper ; Schiele, Holger ; Sierksma, Henk. / Pressure or Pamper? The Effects of Power and Trust Dimensions on Supplier Resource Allocation. In: Journal of supply chain management. 2014 ; Vol. 50, No. 3. pp. 16-36.
@article{1ac18972c7a94512b57b0a3a9a1f3d0b,
title = "Pressure or Pamper? The Effects of Power and Trust Dimensions on Supplier Resource Allocation",
abstract = "Leveraging the supply chain for competitive resources remains a key challenge for supply chain management. Drawing on social exchange theory, this study examines SCM practices that help firms to acquire better supplier resources than rival firms that source from the same supplier. We provide a clearer picture of coercive and competence power, and goodwill and competence trust as key mechanisms to improve supplier resource allocation of physical and innovation resources. We analyze survey data of 185 supplying firms using structural equation modeling. Our analyses yield several interesting findings. First, contrary to other studies we find that coercive tactics do not necessarily affect supplier resource allocation negatively and goodwill trust does not inherently affect supplier resource allocation positively. Second, the results of a multigroup analysis indicate that the dependence of a supplier on the buying firm – in terms of share in turnover – affects the relationship between the trust dimensions and supplier resource allocation more than it does the power dimensions. Third, goodwill trust only affects supplier resource allocation when the buyer has a large share in the supplier's turnover, while competence trust is more effective if buyers account for a small share in the supplier's turnover. The contributions of our study for the supply chain management and social exchange theory literature are discussed",
keywords = "METIS-303394, IR-90530",
author = "Pulles, {Niels Jaring} and Jasper Veldman and Holger Schiele and Henk Sierksma",
year = "2014",
month = "4",
day = "28",
doi = "10.1111/jscm.12049",
language = "English",
volume = "50",
pages = "16--36",
journal = "Journal of supply chain management",
issn = "1523-2409",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "3",

}

Pressure or Pamper? The Effects of Power and Trust Dimensions on Supplier Resource Allocation. / Pulles, Niels Jaring; Veldman, Jasper; Schiele, Holger; Sierksma, Henk.

In: Journal of supply chain management, Vol. 50, No. 3, 28.04.2014, p. 16-36.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Pressure or Pamper? The Effects of Power and Trust Dimensions on Supplier Resource Allocation

AU - Pulles, Niels Jaring

AU - Veldman, Jasper

AU - Schiele, Holger

AU - Sierksma, Henk

PY - 2014/4/28

Y1 - 2014/4/28

N2 - Leveraging the supply chain for competitive resources remains a key challenge for supply chain management. Drawing on social exchange theory, this study examines SCM practices that help firms to acquire better supplier resources than rival firms that source from the same supplier. We provide a clearer picture of coercive and competence power, and goodwill and competence trust as key mechanisms to improve supplier resource allocation of physical and innovation resources. We analyze survey data of 185 supplying firms using structural equation modeling. Our analyses yield several interesting findings. First, contrary to other studies we find that coercive tactics do not necessarily affect supplier resource allocation negatively and goodwill trust does not inherently affect supplier resource allocation positively. Second, the results of a multigroup analysis indicate that the dependence of a supplier on the buying firm – in terms of share in turnover – affects the relationship between the trust dimensions and supplier resource allocation more than it does the power dimensions. Third, goodwill trust only affects supplier resource allocation when the buyer has a large share in the supplier's turnover, while competence trust is more effective if buyers account for a small share in the supplier's turnover. The contributions of our study for the supply chain management and social exchange theory literature are discussed

AB - Leveraging the supply chain for competitive resources remains a key challenge for supply chain management. Drawing on social exchange theory, this study examines SCM practices that help firms to acquire better supplier resources than rival firms that source from the same supplier. We provide a clearer picture of coercive and competence power, and goodwill and competence trust as key mechanisms to improve supplier resource allocation of physical and innovation resources. We analyze survey data of 185 supplying firms using structural equation modeling. Our analyses yield several interesting findings. First, contrary to other studies we find that coercive tactics do not necessarily affect supplier resource allocation negatively and goodwill trust does not inherently affect supplier resource allocation positively. Second, the results of a multigroup analysis indicate that the dependence of a supplier on the buying firm – in terms of share in turnover – affects the relationship between the trust dimensions and supplier resource allocation more than it does the power dimensions. Third, goodwill trust only affects supplier resource allocation when the buyer has a large share in the supplier's turnover, while competence trust is more effective if buyers account for a small share in the supplier's turnover. The contributions of our study for the supply chain management and social exchange theory literature are discussed

KW - METIS-303394

KW - IR-90530

U2 - 10.1111/jscm.12049

DO - 10.1111/jscm.12049

M3 - Article

VL - 50

SP - 16

EP - 36

JO - Journal of supply chain management

JF - Journal of supply chain management

SN - 1523-2409

IS - 3

ER -