Primary and Secondary Fibromyalgia Are The Same: The Universality of Polysymptomatic Distress

Frederick Wolfe (Corresponding Author), Brian Walitt, Johannes J Rasker, Winfried Häuser

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

OBJECTIVE Polysymptomatic distress (PSD) is the underlying metric of fibromyalgia (FM), and levels of PSD can identify criteria-positive FM with > 90% accuracy. We used levels of the PSD scale to test whether symptom levels in primary FM (PFM) and secondary FM (SFM) were the same and whether symptoms were equivalent in persons not meeting FM criteria. METHODS We studied 1525 patients with a clinical diagnosis of FM and 12,037 patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). We used regression models to compare patients with potential and actual PFM to RA patients with potential and actual SFM for 17 key clinical variables. RESULTS When controlled for PSD values, the widespread pain index, symptom severity scale, and pain, global, quality of life, and physical and mental component scores were essentially the same or only slightly different in PFM and SFM. Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index scores were slightly higher in SFM (0.21 units), as was the painful joint count (1.6 joints). Overall, higher PSD scores were associated with more severe symptoms or abnormal status. PSD scores in patients not satisfying FM criteria and in patients satisfying criteria operated similarly. CONCLUSION PFM and SFM are equivalent regarding symptom burden. PSD scores are more informative about severity and severity within diagnosis than dichotomization into FM/non-FM. Studies of FM versus "healthy individuals," or FM versus other diseases, are inherently defective, while studies of FM and PSD in RA offer the opportunity to have meaningful comparison groups, because there are no readily available unbiased appropriate controls for PFM.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)204-212
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of rheumatology
Volume46
Issue number2
Early online date15 Jul 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Feb 2019

Fingerprint

Fibromyalgia
Rheumatoid Arthritis
Joints
Pain
Quality of Life

Cite this

Wolfe, Frederick ; Walitt, Brian ; Rasker, Johannes J ; Häuser, Winfried. / Primary and Secondary Fibromyalgia Are The Same : The Universality of Polysymptomatic Distress. In: Journal of rheumatology. 2019 ; Vol. 46, No. 2. pp. 204-212.
@article{cbe260c6aad6445c9274cac79bec3c50,
title = "Primary and Secondary Fibromyalgia Are The Same: The Universality of Polysymptomatic Distress",
abstract = "OBJECTIVE Polysymptomatic distress (PSD) is the underlying metric of fibromyalgia (FM), and levels of PSD can identify criteria-positive FM with > 90{\%} accuracy. We used levels of the PSD scale to test whether symptom levels in primary FM (PFM) and secondary FM (SFM) were the same and whether symptoms were equivalent in persons not meeting FM criteria. METHODS We studied 1525 patients with a clinical diagnosis of FM and 12,037 patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). We used regression models to compare patients with potential and actual PFM to RA patients with potential and actual SFM for 17 key clinical variables. RESULTS When controlled for PSD values, the widespread pain index, symptom severity scale, and pain, global, quality of life, and physical and mental component scores were essentially the same or only slightly different in PFM and SFM. Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index scores were slightly higher in SFM (0.21 units), as was the painful joint count (1.6 joints). Overall, higher PSD scores were associated with more severe symptoms or abnormal status. PSD scores in patients not satisfying FM criteria and in patients satisfying criteria operated similarly. CONCLUSION PFM and SFM are equivalent regarding symptom burden. PSD scores are more informative about severity and severity within diagnosis than dichotomization into FM/non-FM. Studies of FM versus {"}healthy individuals,{"} or FM versus other diseases, are inherently defective, while studies of FM and PSD in RA offer the opportunity to have meaningful comparison groups, because there are no readily available unbiased appropriate controls for PFM.",
author = "Frederick Wolfe and Brian Walitt and Rasker, {Johannes J} and Winfried H{\"a}user",
year = "2019",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.3899/jrheum.180083",
language = "English",
volume = "46",
pages = "204--212",
journal = "Journal of rheumatology",
issn = "0315-162X",
publisher = "Journal of Rheumatology",
number = "2",

}

Primary and Secondary Fibromyalgia Are The Same : The Universality of Polysymptomatic Distress. / Wolfe, Frederick (Corresponding Author); Walitt, Brian; Rasker, Johannes J; Häuser, Winfried.

In: Journal of rheumatology, Vol. 46, No. 2, 01.02.2019, p. 204-212.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Primary and Secondary Fibromyalgia Are The Same

T2 - The Universality of Polysymptomatic Distress

AU - Wolfe, Frederick

AU - Walitt, Brian

AU - Rasker, Johannes J

AU - Häuser, Winfried

PY - 2019/2/1

Y1 - 2019/2/1

N2 - OBJECTIVE Polysymptomatic distress (PSD) is the underlying metric of fibromyalgia (FM), and levels of PSD can identify criteria-positive FM with > 90% accuracy. We used levels of the PSD scale to test whether symptom levels in primary FM (PFM) and secondary FM (SFM) were the same and whether symptoms were equivalent in persons not meeting FM criteria. METHODS We studied 1525 patients with a clinical diagnosis of FM and 12,037 patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). We used regression models to compare patients with potential and actual PFM to RA patients with potential and actual SFM for 17 key clinical variables. RESULTS When controlled for PSD values, the widespread pain index, symptom severity scale, and pain, global, quality of life, and physical and mental component scores were essentially the same or only slightly different in PFM and SFM. Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index scores were slightly higher in SFM (0.21 units), as was the painful joint count (1.6 joints). Overall, higher PSD scores were associated with more severe symptoms or abnormal status. PSD scores in patients not satisfying FM criteria and in patients satisfying criteria operated similarly. CONCLUSION PFM and SFM are equivalent regarding symptom burden. PSD scores are more informative about severity and severity within diagnosis than dichotomization into FM/non-FM. Studies of FM versus "healthy individuals," or FM versus other diseases, are inherently defective, while studies of FM and PSD in RA offer the opportunity to have meaningful comparison groups, because there are no readily available unbiased appropriate controls for PFM.

AB - OBJECTIVE Polysymptomatic distress (PSD) is the underlying metric of fibromyalgia (FM), and levels of PSD can identify criteria-positive FM with > 90% accuracy. We used levels of the PSD scale to test whether symptom levels in primary FM (PFM) and secondary FM (SFM) were the same and whether symptoms were equivalent in persons not meeting FM criteria. METHODS We studied 1525 patients with a clinical diagnosis of FM and 12,037 patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). We used regression models to compare patients with potential and actual PFM to RA patients with potential and actual SFM for 17 key clinical variables. RESULTS When controlled for PSD values, the widespread pain index, symptom severity scale, and pain, global, quality of life, and physical and mental component scores were essentially the same or only slightly different in PFM and SFM. Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index scores were slightly higher in SFM (0.21 units), as was the painful joint count (1.6 joints). Overall, higher PSD scores were associated with more severe symptoms or abnormal status. PSD scores in patients not satisfying FM criteria and in patients satisfying criteria operated similarly. CONCLUSION PFM and SFM are equivalent regarding symptom burden. PSD scores are more informative about severity and severity within diagnosis than dichotomization into FM/non-FM. Studies of FM versus "healthy individuals," or FM versus other diseases, are inherently defective, while studies of FM and PSD in RA offer the opportunity to have meaningful comparison groups, because there are no readily available unbiased appropriate controls for PFM.

U2 - 10.3899/jrheum.180083

DO - 10.3899/jrheum.180083

M3 - Article

VL - 46

SP - 204

EP - 212

JO - Journal of rheumatology

JF - Journal of rheumatology

SN - 0315-162X

IS - 2

ER -