Primary care in five European countries: A citizens’ perspective on the quality of care for children

Janine A. van Til*, Catharina G.M. Groothuis-Oudshoorn, Eline Vlasblom, Paul L. Kocken, Magda M. Boere-Boonekamp

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

7 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Objective As part of the Models of Child Health Appraised (MOCHA) project, this study aimed to answer the following research questions: 1) How do European citizens perceive the quality of primary health care provided for children? And 2) What are their priorities with respect to quality assessment of primary health care aimed at satisfying children’s needs? Methods Nine potential attributes of quality of primary care were operationalized in 40 quality aspects. An online survey was used to elicit opinions in a representative sample of citizens of Germany, the Netherlands, Poland, Spain, and the United Kingdom. Data collection comprised: background characteristics; perceived quality of primary health care for children; and priority setting of quality aspects. Descriptive analysis was performed and differences between groups were tested using Chi-Square test and ANOVA. Results Valid results were obtained from 2403 respondents. Mean satisfaction with quality of primary care ranged from 5.5 (Poland) to 7.2 (Spain). On average, between 56% (Poland) and 70% (Netherlands) of respondents had a positive perception of the primary health care system for children in their country. The ability of a child to limit their parents’ access to the child’s medical records was judged most negatively in all countries (average agreement score 28%, range 12–36%). The right of a child to a confidential consultation was judged most differently between countries (average agreement score 61%, range 40–75%). Overall top-10 priorities in ensuring high quality primary care were: timeliness (accessibility); skills/ competences, management, facilities (appropriateness); no costs (affordability); information, dignity/respect (continuity); and swift referrals, collaboration (coordination). Discussion Between countries, significant differences exist in the perceived quality of primary care and priorities with regard to quality assessment. Taking into account the citizens’ perspective in decision-making means that aspects with low perceived quality that are highly prioritized warrant further action.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere0224550
JournalPLoS ONE
Volume14
Issue number11
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 11 Nov 2019

Fingerprint

child care
Quality of Health Care
Health care
Primary Health Care
health services
Poland
Analysis of variance (ANOVA)
Netherlands
Spain
affordability
Referral and Consultation
Decision making
Health
Apodidae
Aptitude
Chi-Square Distribution
United Kingdom
decision making
Mental Competency
Medical Records

Cite this

@article{81fb2f77c8704c3ab7186a28fd92a54f,
title = "Primary care in five European countries: A citizens’ perspective on the quality of care for children",
abstract = "Objective As part of the Models of Child Health Appraised (MOCHA) project, this study aimed to answer the following research questions: 1) How do European citizens perceive the quality of primary health care provided for children? And 2) What are their priorities with respect to quality assessment of primary health care aimed at satisfying children’s needs? Methods Nine potential attributes of quality of primary care were operationalized in 40 quality aspects. An online survey was used to elicit opinions in a representative sample of citizens of Germany, the Netherlands, Poland, Spain, and the United Kingdom. Data collection comprised: background characteristics; perceived quality of primary health care for children; and priority setting of quality aspects. Descriptive analysis was performed and differences between groups were tested using Chi-Square test and ANOVA. Results Valid results were obtained from 2403 respondents. Mean satisfaction with quality of primary care ranged from 5.5 (Poland) to 7.2 (Spain). On average, between 56{\%} (Poland) and 70{\%} (Netherlands) of respondents had a positive perception of the primary health care system for children in their country. The ability of a child to limit their parents’ access to the child’s medical records was judged most negatively in all countries (average agreement score 28{\%}, range 12–36{\%}). The right of a child to a confidential consultation was judged most differently between countries (average agreement score 61{\%}, range 40–75{\%}). Overall top-10 priorities in ensuring high quality primary care were: timeliness (accessibility); skills/ competences, management, facilities (appropriateness); no costs (affordability); information, dignity/respect (continuity); and swift referrals, collaboration (coordination). Discussion Between countries, significant differences exist in the perceived quality of primary care and priorities with regard to quality assessment. Taking into account the citizens’ perspective in decision-making means that aspects with low perceived quality that are highly prioritized warrant further action.",
author = "{van Til}, {Janine A.} and Groothuis-Oudshoorn, {Catharina G.M.} and Eline Vlasblom and Kocken, {Paul L.} and Boere-Boonekamp, {Magda M.}",
year = "2019",
month = "11",
day = "11",
doi = "10.1371/journal.pone.0224550",
language = "English",
volume = "14",
journal = "PLoS ONE",
issn = "1932-6203",
publisher = "Public Library of Science",
number = "11",

}

Primary care in five European countries : A citizens’ perspective on the quality of care for children. / van Til, Janine A.; Groothuis-Oudshoorn, Catharina G.M.; Vlasblom, Eline; Kocken, Paul L.; Boere-Boonekamp, Magda M.

In: PLoS ONE, Vol. 14, No. 11, e0224550, 11.11.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Primary care in five European countries

T2 - A citizens’ perspective on the quality of care for children

AU - van Til, Janine A.

AU - Groothuis-Oudshoorn, Catharina G.M.

AU - Vlasblom, Eline

AU - Kocken, Paul L.

AU - Boere-Boonekamp, Magda M.

PY - 2019/11/11

Y1 - 2019/11/11

N2 - Objective As part of the Models of Child Health Appraised (MOCHA) project, this study aimed to answer the following research questions: 1) How do European citizens perceive the quality of primary health care provided for children? And 2) What are their priorities with respect to quality assessment of primary health care aimed at satisfying children’s needs? Methods Nine potential attributes of quality of primary care were operationalized in 40 quality aspects. An online survey was used to elicit opinions in a representative sample of citizens of Germany, the Netherlands, Poland, Spain, and the United Kingdom. Data collection comprised: background characteristics; perceived quality of primary health care for children; and priority setting of quality aspects. Descriptive analysis was performed and differences between groups were tested using Chi-Square test and ANOVA. Results Valid results were obtained from 2403 respondents. Mean satisfaction with quality of primary care ranged from 5.5 (Poland) to 7.2 (Spain). On average, between 56% (Poland) and 70% (Netherlands) of respondents had a positive perception of the primary health care system for children in their country. The ability of a child to limit their parents’ access to the child’s medical records was judged most negatively in all countries (average agreement score 28%, range 12–36%). The right of a child to a confidential consultation was judged most differently between countries (average agreement score 61%, range 40–75%). Overall top-10 priorities in ensuring high quality primary care were: timeliness (accessibility); skills/ competences, management, facilities (appropriateness); no costs (affordability); information, dignity/respect (continuity); and swift referrals, collaboration (coordination). Discussion Between countries, significant differences exist in the perceived quality of primary care and priorities with regard to quality assessment. Taking into account the citizens’ perspective in decision-making means that aspects with low perceived quality that are highly prioritized warrant further action.

AB - Objective As part of the Models of Child Health Appraised (MOCHA) project, this study aimed to answer the following research questions: 1) How do European citizens perceive the quality of primary health care provided for children? And 2) What are their priorities with respect to quality assessment of primary health care aimed at satisfying children’s needs? Methods Nine potential attributes of quality of primary care were operationalized in 40 quality aspects. An online survey was used to elicit opinions in a representative sample of citizens of Germany, the Netherlands, Poland, Spain, and the United Kingdom. Data collection comprised: background characteristics; perceived quality of primary health care for children; and priority setting of quality aspects. Descriptive analysis was performed and differences between groups were tested using Chi-Square test and ANOVA. Results Valid results were obtained from 2403 respondents. Mean satisfaction with quality of primary care ranged from 5.5 (Poland) to 7.2 (Spain). On average, between 56% (Poland) and 70% (Netherlands) of respondents had a positive perception of the primary health care system for children in their country. The ability of a child to limit their parents’ access to the child’s medical records was judged most negatively in all countries (average agreement score 28%, range 12–36%). The right of a child to a confidential consultation was judged most differently between countries (average agreement score 61%, range 40–75%). Overall top-10 priorities in ensuring high quality primary care were: timeliness (accessibility); skills/ competences, management, facilities (appropriateness); no costs (affordability); information, dignity/respect (continuity); and swift referrals, collaboration (coordination). Discussion Between countries, significant differences exist in the perceived quality of primary care and priorities with regard to quality assessment. Taking into account the citizens’ perspective in decision-making means that aspects with low perceived quality that are highly prioritized warrant further action.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85074798713&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1371/journal.pone.0224550

DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0224550

M3 - Article

C2 - 31710618

AN - SCOPUS:85074798713

VL - 14

JO - PLoS ONE

JF - PLoS ONE

SN - 1932-6203

IS - 11

M1 - e0224550

ER -