Programmers Performance on Structured versus Nonstructured Function Definitions

Klaas van den Berg, P.M. van den Broek

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademic

    48 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    A control-flow model for functional programs is used in an experimental comparison of the performance of programmers on structured versus nonstructured Miranda function definitions. The experimental set-up is similar to the Scanlan study (1989). However, in the present study, a two-factor repeated measures design is used in the statistical analysis. The control-flow model appears to be useful in the shaping of the experiment. A significantly better performance has been found for structured function definitions on both dependent variables: the time needed to answer questions about the function definitions and the propor-tion correct answers. Moreover, for structured function definitions, a counter-intuitive result has been obtained: there are significantly fewer errors in larger definitions than in smaller ones.
    Original languageUndefined
    Pages (from-to)-
    Number of pages35
    JournalMemoranda informatica
    Issue number95-11
    Publication statusPublished - Feb 1995

    Keywords

    • SE-SMM: Software Measurement and Metrics
    • Comprehensibility
    • IR-64351
    • METIS-118472
    • Structured programming
    • Software metric
    • EWI-11075
    • Functional Programming

    Cite this

    van den Berg, Klaas ; van den Broek, P.M. / Programmers Performance on Structured versus Nonstructured Function Definitions. In: Memoranda informatica. 1995 ; No. 95-11. pp. -.
    @article{ea0b19debff246629e56f2904151fdeb,
    title = "Programmers Performance on Structured versus Nonstructured Function Definitions",
    abstract = "A control-flow model for functional programs is used in an experimental comparison of the performance of programmers on structured versus nonstructured Miranda function definitions. The experimental set-up is similar to the Scanlan study (1989). However, in the present study, a two-factor repeated measures design is used in the statistical analysis. The control-flow model appears to be useful in the shaping of the experiment. A significantly better performance has been found for structured function definitions on both dependent variables: the time needed to answer questions about the function definitions and the propor-tion correct answers. Moreover, for structured function definitions, a counter-intuitive result has been obtained: there are significantly fewer errors in larger definitions than in smaller ones.",
    keywords = "SE-SMM: Software Measurement and Metrics, Comprehensibility, IR-64351, METIS-118472, Structured programming, Software metric, EWI-11075, Functional Programming",
    author = "{van den Berg}, Klaas and {van den Broek}, P.M.",
    year = "1995",
    month = "2",
    language = "Undefined",
    pages = "--",
    journal = "Memoranda informatica",
    issn = "0924-3755",
    publisher = "University of Twente",
    number = "95-11",

    }

    Programmers Performance on Structured versus Nonstructured Function Definitions. / van den Berg, Klaas; van den Broek, P.M.

    In: Memoranda informatica, No. 95-11, 02.1995, p. -.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademic

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Programmers Performance on Structured versus Nonstructured Function Definitions

    AU - van den Berg, Klaas

    AU - van den Broek, P.M.

    PY - 1995/2

    Y1 - 1995/2

    N2 - A control-flow model for functional programs is used in an experimental comparison of the performance of programmers on structured versus nonstructured Miranda function definitions. The experimental set-up is similar to the Scanlan study (1989). However, in the present study, a two-factor repeated measures design is used in the statistical analysis. The control-flow model appears to be useful in the shaping of the experiment. A significantly better performance has been found for structured function definitions on both dependent variables: the time needed to answer questions about the function definitions and the propor-tion correct answers. Moreover, for structured function definitions, a counter-intuitive result has been obtained: there are significantly fewer errors in larger definitions than in smaller ones.

    AB - A control-flow model for functional programs is used in an experimental comparison of the performance of programmers on structured versus nonstructured Miranda function definitions. The experimental set-up is similar to the Scanlan study (1989). However, in the present study, a two-factor repeated measures design is used in the statistical analysis. The control-flow model appears to be useful in the shaping of the experiment. A significantly better performance has been found for structured function definitions on both dependent variables: the time needed to answer questions about the function definitions and the propor-tion correct answers. Moreover, for structured function definitions, a counter-intuitive result has been obtained: there are significantly fewer errors in larger definitions than in smaller ones.

    KW - SE-SMM: Software Measurement and Metrics

    KW - Comprehensibility

    KW - IR-64351

    KW - METIS-118472

    KW - Structured programming

    KW - Software metric

    KW - EWI-11075

    KW - Functional Programming

    M3 - Article

    SP - -

    JO - Memoranda informatica

    JF - Memoranda informatica

    SN - 0924-3755

    IS - 95-11

    ER -