Programmers Performance on Structured versus Nonstructured Function Definitions

Klaas van den Berg, P.M. van den Broek

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademic

    70 Downloads (Pure)


    A control-flow model for functional programs is used in an experimental comparison of the performance of programmers on structured versus nonstructured Miranda function definitions. The experimental set-up is similar to the Scanlan study (1989). However, in the present study, a two-factor repeated measures design is used in the statistical analysis. The control-flow model appears to be useful in the shaping of the experiment. A significantly better performance has been found for structured function definitions on both dependent variables: the time needed to answer questions about the function definitions and the propor-tion correct answers. Moreover, for structured function definitions, a counter-intuitive result has been obtained: there are significantly fewer errors in larger definitions than in smaller ones.
    Original languageUndefined
    Pages (from-to)-
    Number of pages35
    JournalMemoranda informatica
    Issue number95-11
    Publication statusPublished - Feb 1995


    • SE-SMM: Software Measurement and Metrics
    • Comprehensibility
    • IR-64351
    • METIS-118472
    • Structured programming
    • Software metric
    • EWI-11075
    • Functional Programming

    Cite this