PROMs and quality of care

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterAcademicpeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

The impairment of patient’s health is the major driver of healthcare and healthcare research. For many years, the pathophysiological understanding of disease was considered the holy grail of medicine. However, increasingly, the central role of patients is being recognized in current times. Health professionals should treat their patients and not limit their attention to the patient’s disease. Since the patient’s perspective on their disease can only be given by the patient him/herself, this paradigm shift has led to the proliferation and adoption of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) throughout all levels of healthcare. In this chapter we will first introduce a conceptual framework for PROs, according to the World Health Organization definition of health. It will demonstrate how PROs can be and have been developed to assess areas of human functioning across a continuum of social complexity ranging from simple, unidimensional measures of symptoms to complex, integrated domains of social functioning. Generic PROs may intend to provide information that can be used to compare health status between populations. Alternatively, PROs may have a particular focus on specific populations, diseases, or functions. These instruments are called specific instruments. The applications and advantages of specific and generic instruments will be discussed in detail in this chapter. Although the primary application of PROs in rheumatology was traditionally applied as primary or secondary endpoints in clinical trials, they are increasingly used in other measurement settings as well. The chapter includes a description of these developments and the requirements they imply for PROs in detail. Finally the psychometric models that are frequently utilized in the development and evaluation of PROs will be discussed, with particular attention for the modern, item response theory-based approach and how it can be utilized to address difficult-to-resolve measurement-related issues related to the interpretability and reliability of PROs.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationPatient Reported Outcome Measures in Rheumatic Diseases
EditorsYasser El Miedany
PublisherSpringer
Number of pages19
ISBN (Electronic)9783319328515
ISBN (Print)9783319328492
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2016

Fingerprint

Quality of Health Care
Health
Delivery of Health Care
Patient Reported Outcome Measures
Health Services Research
Rheumatology
Psychometrics
Population
Health Status
Medicine
Clinical Trials

Keywords

  • Classical test theory
  • Clinical trials
  • Comparative effectiveness
  • Health-related quality of life
  • Item banking
  • Item response theory
  • Patient-reported outcomes
  • Quality of care
  • Rheumatology

Cite this

Voshaar, M. A. H. O., & Van De Laar, M. A. F. J. (2016). PROMs and quality of care. In Y. El Miedany (Ed.), Patient Reported Outcome Measures in Rheumatic Diseases Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32851-5_1
Voshaar, Martijn A.H.Oude ; Van De Laar, Mart A.F.J. / PROMs and quality of care. Patient Reported Outcome Measures in Rheumatic Diseases. editor / Yasser El Miedany. Springer, 2016.
@inbook{1835918fe3644255a36ef4270458d5cc,
title = "PROMs and quality of care",
abstract = "The impairment of patient’s health is the major driver of healthcare and healthcare research. For many years, the pathophysiological understanding of disease was considered the holy grail of medicine. However, increasingly, the central role of patients is being recognized in current times. Health professionals should treat their patients and not limit their attention to the patient’s disease. Since the patient’s perspective on their disease can only be given by the patient him/herself, this paradigm shift has led to the proliferation and adoption of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) throughout all levels of healthcare. In this chapter we will first introduce a conceptual framework for PROs, according to the World Health Organization definition of health. It will demonstrate how PROs can be and have been developed to assess areas of human functioning across a continuum of social complexity ranging from simple, unidimensional measures of symptoms to complex, integrated domains of social functioning. Generic PROs may intend to provide information that can be used to compare health status between populations. Alternatively, PROs may have a particular focus on specific populations, diseases, or functions. These instruments are called specific instruments. The applications and advantages of specific and generic instruments will be discussed in detail in this chapter. Although the primary application of PROs in rheumatology was traditionally applied as primary or secondary endpoints in clinical trials, they are increasingly used in other measurement settings as well. The chapter includes a description of these developments and the requirements they imply for PROs in detail. Finally the psychometric models that are frequently utilized in the development and evaluation of PROs will be discussed, with particular attention for the modern, item response theory-based approach and how it can be utilized to address difficult-to-resolve measurement-related issues related to the interpretability and reliability of PROs.",
keywords = "Classical test theory, Clinical trials, Comparative effectiveness, Health-related quality of life, Item banking, Item response theory, Patient-reported outcomes, Quality of care, Rheumatology",
author = "Voshaar, {Martijn A.H.Oude} and {Van De Laar}, {Mart A.F.J.}",
year = "2016",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/978-3-319-32851-5_1",
language = "English",
isbn = "9783319328492",
editor = "{El Miedany}, Yasser",
booktitle = "Patient Reported Outcome Measures in Rheumatic Diseases",
publisher = "Springer",

}

Voshaar, MAHO & Van De Laar, MAFJ 2016, PROMs and quality of care. in Y El Miedany (ed.), Patient Reported Outcome Measures in Rheumatic Diseases. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32851-5_1

PROMs and quality of care. / Voshaar, Martijn A.H.Oude; Van De Laar, Mart A.F.J.

Patient Reported Outcome Measures in Rheumatic Diseases. ed. / Yasser El Miedany. Springer, 2016.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterAcademicpeer-review

TY - CHAP

T1 - PROMs and quality of care

AU - Voshaar, Martijn A.H.Oude

AU - Van De Laar, Mart A.F.J.

PY - 2016/1/1

Y1 - 2016/1/1

N2 - The impairment of patient’s health is the major driver of healthcare and healthcare research. For many years, the pathophysiological understanding of disease was considered the holy grail of medicine. However, increasingly, the central role of patients is being recognized in current times. Health professionals should treat their patients and not limit their attention to the patient’s disease. Since the patient’s perspective on their disease can only be given by the patient him/herself, this paradigm shift has led to the proliferation and adoption of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) throughout all levels of healthcare. In this chapter we will first introduce a conceptual framework for PROs, according to the World Health Organization definition of health. It will demonstrate how PROs can be and have been developed to assess areas of human functioning across a continuum of social complexity ranging from simple, unidimensional measures of symptoms to complex, integrated domains of social functioning. Generic PROs may intend to provide information that can be used to compare health status between populations. Alternatively, PROs may have a particular focus on specific populations, diseases, or functions. These instruments are called specific instruments. The applications and advantages of specific and generic instruments will be discussed in detail in this chapter. Although the primary application of PROs in rheumatology was traditionally applied as primary or secondary endpoints in clinical trials, they are increasingly used in other measurement settings as well. The chapter includes a description of these developments and the requirements they imply for PROs in detail. Finally the psychometric models that are frequently utilized in the development and evaluation of PROs will be discussed, with particular attention for the modern, item response theory-based approach and how it can be utilized to address difficult-to-resolve measurement-related issues related to the interpretability and reliability of PROs.

AB - The impairment of patient’s health is the major driver of healthcare and healthcare research. For many years, the pathophysiological understanding of disease was considered the holy grail of medicine. However, increasingly, the central role of patients is being recognized in current times. Health professionals should treat their patients and not limit their attention to the patient’s disease. Since the patient’s perspective on their disease can only be given by the patient him/herself, this paradigm shift has led to the proliferation and adoption of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) throughout all levels of healthcare. In this chapter we will first introduce a conceptual framework for PROs, according to the World Health Organization definition of health. It will demonstrate how PROs can be and have been developed to assess areas of human functioning across a continuum of social complexity ranging from simple, unidimensional measures of symptoms to complex, integrated domains of social functioning. Generic PROs may intend to provide information that can be used to compare health status between populations. Alternatively, PROs may have a particular focus on specific populations, diseases, or functions. These instruments are called specific instruments. The applications and advantages of specific and generic instruments will be discussed in detail in this chapter. Although the primary application of PROs in rheumatology was traditionally applied as primary or secondary endpoints in clinical trials, they are increasingly used in other measurement settings as well. The chapter includes a description of these developments and the requirements they imply for PROs in detail. Finally the psychometric models that are frequently utilized in the development and evaluation of PROs will be discussed, with particular attention for the modern, item response theory-based approach and how it can be utilized to address difficult-to-resolve measurement-related issues related to the interpretability and reliability of PROs.

KW - Classical test theory

KW - Clinical trials

KW - Comparative effectiveness

KW - Health-related quality of life

KW - Item banking

KW - Item response theory

KW - Patient-reported outcomes

KW - Quality of care

KW - Rheumatology

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85017076377&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/978-3-319-32851-5_1

DO - 10.1007/978-3-319-32851-5_1

M3 - Chapter

SN - 9783319328492

BT - Patient Reported Outcome Measures in Rheumatic Diseases

A2 - El Miedany, Yasser

PB - Springer

ER -

Voshaar MAHO, Van De Laar MAFJ. PROMs and quality of care. In El Miedany Y, editor, Patient Reported Outcome Measures in Rheumatic Diseases. Springer. 2016 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32851-5_1