Public opinions about human enhancement can enhance the expert-only debate. A review study

Anne M. Dijkstra, Mirjam Schuijff

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Human enhancement, the non-medical use of biomedical technologies to improve the human body or performance beyond their ‘natural’ limitations, is a growing trend. At the same time, the use of these technologies has societal consequences. In societal debates about human enhancement, however, it is mainly the voices of experts that are being heard, and little is known about the public’s understanding of human enhancement. The views of the public can give valuable insights, and can, in turn, supplement experts’ voices in political decision-making as has been argued before for other emerging technologies. This study presents a systematic literature review of current public perceptions and attitudes towards technologies for human enhancement. Results show that the public’s view has not been assessed often. Studies originate mainly from western-oriented countries and cover a broad range of enhancement technologies. In the studies, the majority of respondents hold moderate to strong negative attitudes towards enhancement technologies for non-medical applications, although the type of technology influences these opinions. The study provides an overview of what is known about citizens’ attitudes towards technologies for human enhancement.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)588-602
Number of pages15
JournalPublic understanding of science
Volume25
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 19 Jan 2016

Fingerprint

Biomedical Enhancement
Public Opinion
public opinion
expert
Technology
Biomedical Technology
Human Body
Decision Making
political decision making
Human Enhancement
supplement
Decision making
citizen

Keywords

  • METIS-307740
  • IR-97240

Cite this

@article{dbacce2096b8402f8b376893ae1eb99d,
title = "Public opinions about human enhancement can enhance the expert-only debate. A review study",
abstract = "Human enhancement, the non-medical use of biomedical technologies to improve the human body or performance beyond their ‘natural’ limitations, is a growing trend. At the same time, the use of these technologies has societal consequences. In societal debates about human enhancement, however, it is mainly the voices of experts that are being heard, and little is known about the public’s understanding of human enhancement. The views of the public can give valuable insights, and can, in turn, supplement experts’ voices in political decision-making as has been argued before for other emerging technologies. This study presents a systematic literature review of current public perceptions and attitudes towards technologies for human enhancement. Results show that the public’s view has not been assessed often. Studies originate mainly from western-oriented countries and cover a broad range of enhancement technologies. In the studies, the majority of respondents hold moderate to strong negative attitudes towards enhancement technologies for non-medical applications, although the type of technology influences these opinions. The study provides an overview of what is known about citizens’ attitudes towards technologies for human enhancement.",
keywords = "METIS-307740, IR-97240",
author = "Dijkstra, {Anne M.} and Mirjam Schuijff",
year = "2016",
month = "1",
day = "19",
doi = "10.1177/0963662514566748",
language = "English",
volume = "25",
pages = "588--602",
journal = "Public understanding of science",
issn = "0963-6625",
publisher = "SAGE Publications",
number = "5",

}

Public opinions about human enhancement can enhance the expert-only debate. A review study. / Dijkstra, Anne M.; Schuijff, Mirjam.

In: Public understanding of science, Vol. 25, No. 5, 19.01.2016, p. 588-602.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Public opinions about human enhancement can enhance the expert-only debate. A review study

AU - Dijkstra, Anne M.

AU - Schuijff, Mirjam

PY - 2016/1/19

Y1 - 2016/1/19

N2 - Human enhancement, the non-medical use of biomedical technologies to improve the human body or performance beyond their ‘natural’ limitations, is a growing trend. At the same time, the use of these technologies has societal consequences. In societal debates about human enhancement, however, it is mainly the voices of experts that are being heard, and little is known about the public’s understanding of human enhancement. The views of the public can give valuable insights, and can, in turn, supplement experts’ voices in political decision-making as has been argued before for other emerging technologies. This study presents a systematic literature review of current public perceptions and attitudes towards technologies for human enhancement. Results show that the public’s view has not been assessed often. Studies originate mainly from western-oriented countries and cover a broad range of enhancement technologies. In the studies, the majority of respondents hold moderate to strong negative attitudes towards enhancement technologies for non-medical applications, although the type of technology influences these opinions. The study provides an overview of what is known about citizens’ attitudes towards technologies for human enhancement.

AB - Human enhancement, the non-medical use of biomedical technologies to improve the human body or performance beyond their ‘natural’ limitations, is a growing trend. At the same time, the use of these technologies has societal consequences. In societal debates about human enhancement, however, it is mainly the voices of experts that are being heard, and little is known about the public’s understanding of human enhancement. The views of the public can give valuable insights, and can, in turn, supplement experts’ voices in political decision-making as has been argued before for other emerging technologies. This study presents a systematic literature review of current public perceptions and attitudes towards technologies for human enhancement. Results show that the public’s view has not been assessed often. Studies originate mainly from western-oriented countries and cover a broad range of enhancement technologies. In the studies, the majority of respondents hold moderate to strong negative attitudes towards enhancement technologies for non-medical applications, although the type of technology influences these opinions. The study provides an overview of what is known about citizens’ attitudes towards technologies for human enhancement.

KW - METIS-307740

KW - IR-97240

U2 - 10.1177/0963662514566748

DO - 10.1177/0963662514566748

M3 - Article

VL - 25

SP - 588

EP - 602

JO - Public understanding of science

JF - Public understanding of science

SN - 0963-6625

IS - 5

ER -