Quantitative comparison of analysis methods for spectroscopic optical coherence tomography: reply to comment

Nienke  Bosschaart; Ton van Leeuwen; Maurice C.G. Aalders; Dirk Faber

doi:10.1364/BOE.5.003034

Quantitative comparison of analysis methods for spectroscopic optical coherence tomography: reply to comment

Nienke Bosschaart, Ton van Leeuwen, Maurice C.G. Aalders, Dirk Faber

Biomedical Photonic Imaging

Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/Letter to the editor › Academic › peer-review

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We reply to the comment by Kraszewski et al on “Quantitative comparison of analysis methods for spectroscopic optical coherence tomography.” We present additional simulations evaluating the proposed window function. We conclude that our simulations show good qualitative agreement with the results of Kraszewski, in support of their conclusion that SOCT optimization should include window shape, next to choice of window size and analysis algorithm.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	3034-3035
Journal	Biomedical optics express
Volume	5
Issue number	9
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1364/BOE.5.003034
Publication status	Published - 2014

Access to Document

10.1364/BOE.5.003034

5 Citations
1 Article

Quantitative comparison of analysis methods for spectroscopic optical coherence tomography
Bosschaart, N., van Leeuwen, T., Aalders, M. C. G. & Faber, D., 2013, In: Biomedical optics express. 4, 11, p. 2570-2584
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Academic › peer-review

Open Access
File
33 Citations (Scopus)

26 Downloads (Pure)

Cite this

@article{7fab5d4c01ee407990cee4f270994102,

title = "Quantitative comparison of analysis methods for spectroscopic optical coherence tomography: reply to comment",

abstract = "We reply to the comment by Kraszewski et al on “Quantitative comparison of analysis methods for spectroscopic optical coherence tomography.” We present additional simulations evaluating the proposed window function. We conclude that our simulations show good qualitative agreement with the results of Kraszewski, in support of their conclusion that SOCT optimization should include window shape, next to choice of window size and analysis algorithm.",

author = "Nienke Bosschaart and {van Leeuwen}, Ton and Aalders, {Maurice C.G.} and Dirk Faber",

year = "2014",

doi = "10.1364/BOE.5.003034",

language = "English",

volume = "5",

pages = "3034--3035",

journal = "Biomedical optics express",

issn = "2156-7085",

publisher = "The Optical Society",

number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Quantitative comparison of analysis methods for spectroscopic optical coherence tomography: reply to comment

AU - Bosschaart, Nienke

AU - van Leeuwen, Ton

AU - Aalders, Maurice C.G.

AU - Faber, Dirk

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - We reply to the comment by Kraszewski et al on “Quantitative comparison of analysis methods for spectroscopic optical coherence tomography.” We present additional simulations evaluating the proposed window function. We conclude that our simulations show good qualitative agreement with the results of Kraszewski, in support of their conclusion that SOCT optimization should include window shape, next to choice of window size and analysis algorithm.

AB - We reply to the comment by Kraszewski et al on “Quantitative comparison of analysis methods for spectroscopic optical coherence tomography.” We present additional simulations evaluating the proposed window function. We conclude that our simulations show good qualitative agreement with the results of Kraszewski, in support of their conclusion that SOCT optimization should include window shape, next to choice of window size and analysis algorithm.

U2 - 10.1364/BOE.5.003034

DO - 10.1364/BOE.5.003034

M3 - Comment/Letter to the editor

SN - 2156-7085

VL - 5

SP - 3034

EP - 3035

JO - Biomedical optics express

JF - Biomedical optics express

IS - 9

ER -

Quantitative comparison of analysis methods for spectroscopic optical coherence tomography: reply to comment

Abstract

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Research output

Quantitative comparison of analysis methods for spectroscopic optical coherence tomography

Cite this