Quantitative sustainability assessment of metal additive manufacturing: A systematic review

Valentina Pusateri; Michael Zwicky Hauschild; Sami Kara; Constantinos Goulas; Stig Irving Olsen

doi:10.1016/j.cirpj.2023.12.005

Quantitative sustainability assessment of metal additive manufacturing: A systematic review

Valentina Pusateri^*
, Michael Zwicky Hauschild
, Sami Kara
, Constantinos Goulas
, Stig Irving Olsen

^*Corresponding author for this work

Advanced Manufacturing, Sustainable Products & Energy Systems

Research output: Contribution to journal › Review article › Academic › peer-review

29 Citations (Scopus)

282 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This paper presents a systematic critical review of quantitative sustainability assessment studies on metal additive manufacturing (MAM) with a life cycle perspective. Potential benefits and present challenges of MAM are also discussed. MAM showed the potential to reduce overall environmental impacts and be more cost-effective for parts with complex designs, high value and low production volumes, particularly for automotive and aerospace components. However, currently, conventional manufacturing appears to have a better sustainability performance than MAM for simple parts in industrial applications. Overall, MAM technology is still in development, even if there have been optimizations and method consolidations.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	95-110
Number of pages	16
Journal	CIRP journal of manufacturing science and technology
Volume	49
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirpj.2023.12.005
Publication status	Published - Apr 2024

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

SDG 9 Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure
SDG 12 Responsible Consumption and Production

Keywords

3D-printing
Life cycle assessment
Metals
Rapid prototyping
Sustainable development goals

Access to Document

10.1016/j.cirpj.2023.12.005Licence: CC BY

1-s2.0-S1755581723001736-mainFinal published version, 3.26 MBLicence: CC BY

Cite this

@article{11ec8ebed8654bbab8fe728abdc2071d,

title = "Quantitative sustainability assessment of metal additive manufacturing: A systematic review",

abstract = "This paper presents a systematic critical review of quantitative sustainability assessment studies on metal additive manufacturing (MAM) with a life cycle perspective. Potential benefits and present challenges of MAM are also discussed. MAM showed the potential to reduce overall environmental impacts and be more cost-effective for parts with complex designs, high value and low production volumes, particularly for automotive and aerospace components. However, currently, conventional manufacturing appears to have a better sustainability performance than MAM for simple parts in industrial applications. Overall, MAM technology is still in development, even if there have been optimizations and method consolidations.",

keywords = "3D-printing, Life cycle assessment, Metals, Rapid prototyping, Sustainable development goals",

author = "Valentina Pusateri and Hauschild, \{Michael Zwicky\} and Sami Kara and Constantinos Goulas and Olsen, \{Stig Irving\}",

note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2024 The Authors",

year = "2024",

month = apr,

doi = "10.1016/j.cirpj.2023.12.005",

language = "English",

volume = "49",

pages = "95--110",

journal = "CIRP journal of manufacturing science and technology",

issn = "1755-5817",

publisher = "Elsevier",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Quantitative sustainability assessment of metal additive manufacturing

T2 - A systematic review

AU - Pusateri, Valentina

AU - Hauschild, Michael Zwicky

AU - Kara, Sami

AU - Goulas, Constantinos

AU - Olsen, Stig Irving

PY - 2024/4

Y1 - 2024/4

N2 - This paper presents a systematic critical review of quantitative sustainability assessment studies on metal additive manufacturing (MAM) with a life cycle perspective. Potential benefits and present challenges of MAM are also discussed. MAM showed the potential to reduce overall environmental impacts and be more cost-effective for parts with complex designs, high value and low production volumes, particularly for automotive and aerospace components. However, currently, conventional manufacturing appears to have a better sustainability performance than MAM for simple parts in industrial applications. Overall, MAM technology is still in development, even if there have been optimizations and method consolidations.

AB - This paper presents a systematic critical review of quantitative sustainability assessment studies on metal additive manufacturing (MAM) with a life cycle perspective. Potential benefits and present challenges of MAM are also discussed. MAM showed the potential to reduce overall environmental impacts and be more cost-effective for parts with complex designs, high value and low production volumes, particularly for automotive and aerospace components. However, currently, conventional manufacturing appears to have a better sustainability performance than MAM for simple parts in industrial applications. Overall, MAM technology is still in development, even if there have been optimizations and method consolidations.

KW - 3D-printing

KW - Life cycle assessment

KW - Metals

KW - Rapid prototyping

KW - Sustainable development goals

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85182519086

U2 - 10.1016/j.cirpj.2023.12.005

DO - 10.1016/j.cirpj.2023.12.005

M3 - Review article

AN - SCOPUS:85182519086

SN - 1755-5817

VL - 49

SP - 95

EP - 110

JO - CIRP journal of manufacturing science and technology

JF - CIRP journal of manufacturing science and technology

ER -

Quantitative sustainability assessment of metal additive manufacturing: A systematic review

Abstract

UN SDGs

Keywords

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this