R&D performance measurement: more than choosing a set of metrics

I.C. Kerssens-van Drongelen, J. Bilderbeek

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

    133 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    In this article the results are presented of an empirical study focusing on the effectiveness of R&D performance measurement practices in the Netherlands. First, a theoretical examination of the subject ‘R&D performance measurement’ is given within the context of performance control. A distinction is made between feedback and feed forward control and between the R&D function and the R&D organisation. Subsequently, a description is given of the current practices of R&D performance measurement in terms of measurement purposes, metrics, measurement techniques, norms setting, etc. Furthermore, the influence of contingencies on measurement system design is explored. The data for this research were gathered by means of a survey and nine in‐depth interviews. Generally, managers evaluate their measurement systems as being quite valuable, having a positive impact on performance. The findings described in this paper can be used as references for managers to benchmark their R&D measurement procedures: in this respect we distinguish highly and hardly effective measurement procedures. The most important characteristic that seems to distinguish the most effective systems from the less effective ones is customer focus.
    Original languageUndefined
    Pages (from-to)35-46
    Number of pages12
    JournalR & D management
    Volume29
    Issue number1
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1999

    Keywords

    • IR-58301
    • METIS-124142

    Cite this

    Kerssens-van Drongelen, I.C. ; Bilderbeek, J. / R&D performance measurement: more than choosing a set of metrics. In: R & D management. 1999 ; Vol. 29, No. 1. pp. 35-46.
    @article{74041757601a4d9ca1f516372f07ac01,
    title = "R&D performance measurement: more than choosing a set of metrics",
    abstract = "In this article the results are presented of an empirical study focusing on the effectiveness of R&D performance measurement practices in the Netherlands. First, a theoretical examination of the subject ‘R&D performance measurement’ is given within the context of performance control. A distinction is made between feedback and feed forward control and between the R&D function and the R&D organisation. Subsequently, a description is given of the current practices of R&D performance measurement in terms of measurement purposes, metrics, measurement techniques, norms setting, etc. Furthermore, the influence of contingencies on measurement system design is explored. The data for this research were gathered by means of a survey and nine in‐depth interviews. Generally, managers evaluate their measurement systems as being quite valuable, having a positive impact on performance. The findings described in this paper can be used as references for managers to benchmark their R&D measurement procedures: in this respect we distinguish highly and hardly effective measurement procedures. The most important characteristic that seems to distinguish the most effective systems from the less effective ones is customer focus.",
    keywords = "IR-58301, METIS-124142",
    author = "{Kerssens-van Drongelen}, I.C. and J. Bilderbeek",
    year = "1999",
    doi = "10.1111/1467-9310.00115",
    language = "Undefined",
    volume = "29",
    pages = "35--46",
    journal = "R & D management",
    issn = "0033-6807",
    publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
    number = "1",

    }

    Kerssens-van Drongelen, IC & Bilderbeek, J 1999, 'R&D performance measurement: more than choosing a set of metrics', R & D management, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 35-46. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9310.00115

    R&D performance measurement: more than choosing a set of metrics. / Kerssens-van Drongelen, I.C.; Bilderbeek, J.

    In: R & D management, Vol. 29, No. 1, 1999, p. 35-46.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - R&D performance measurement: more than choosing a set of metrics

    AU - Kerssens-van Drongelen, I.C.

    AU - Bilderbeek, J.

    PY - 1999

    Y1 - 1999

    N2 - In this article the results are presented of an empirical study focusing on the effectiveness of R&D performance measurement practices in the Netherlands. First, a theoretical examination of the subject ‘R&D performance measurement’ is given within the context of performance control. A distinction is made between feedback and feed forward control and between the R&D function and the R&D organisation. Subsequently, a description is given of the current practices of R&D performance measurement in terms of measurement purposes, metrics, measurement techniques, norms setting, etc. Furthermore, the influence of contingencies on measurement system design is explored. The data for this research were gathered by means of a survey and nine in‐depth interviews. Generally, managers evaluate their measurement systems as being quite valuable, having a positive impact on performance. The findings described in this paper can be used as references for managers to benchmark their R&D measurement procedures: in this respect we distinguish highly and hardly effective measurement procedures. The most important characteristic that seems to distinguish the most effective systems from the less effective ones is customer focus.

    AB - In this article the results are presented of an empirical study focusing on the effectiveness of R&D performance measurement practices in the Netherlands. First, a theoretical examination of the subject ‘R&D performance measurement’ is given within the context of performance control. A distinction is made between feedback and feed forward control and between the R&D function and the R&D organisation. Subsequently, a description is given of the current practices of R&D performance measurement in terms of measurement purposes, metrics, measurement techniques, norms setting, etc. Furthermore, the influence of contingencies on measurement system design is explored. The data for this research were gathered by means of a survey and nine in‐depth interviews. Generally, managers evaluate their measurement systems as being quite valuable, having a positive impact on performance. The findings described in this paper can be used as references for managers to benchmark their R&D measurement procedures: in this respect we distinguish highly and hardly effective measurement procedures. The most important characteristic that seems to distinguish the most effective systems from the less effective ones is customer focus.

    KW - IR-58301

    KW - METIS-124142

    U2 - 10.1111/1467-9310.00115

    DO - 10.1111/1467-9310.00115

    M3 - Article

    VL - 29

    SP - 35

    EP - 46

    JO - R & D management

    JF - R & D management

    SN - 0033-6807

    IS - 1

    ER -