Abstract
Research on interorganizational policy implementation continues to be characterized by diverse theoretical approaches. It is perhaps surprising to observe, however, that formal and especially rational-choice approaches have been essentially neglected in the study of policy implementation processes. This article focuses on this matter and reaches mixed conclusions. An examination of how rational-choice approaches such as game theory might contribute to the enhancement of interorganizational management shows that serious limitations constrain what may be possible theoretically through the formal rational-choice representation and analysis of many interorganizational implementation settings. Nevertheless, and somewhat paradoxically, exploring these qualifications suggests a set of practical implications for the actual conduct of management in policy network settings.
| Original language | Undefined |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 43-57 |
| Number of pages | 14 |
| Journal | American review of public administration |
| Volume | 25 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1995 |
Keywords
- METIS-100629
- IR-2503