Rationales for public participation in environmental policy and governance: practitioners' perspectives

Anna Wesselink, Jouni Paavola, Oliver Fritsch, Ortwin Renn

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

135 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Participation has become a mantra in environmental governance. However, there are signs that the participatory agenda has started to lose its momentum and justification because of disappointments about actual achievements. Rather than focusing on improving participatory processes or articulating best practices, in this paper we seek to understand the more fundamental reasons why difficulties are encountered. In our interviews with professionals involved in participation in environmental governance we found varying and potentially conflicting rationales for participation, with instrumental and legalistic rationales dominating. We contend that the institutional and political context in which this participation takes place is an important explanation of this prevalence. This includes the provisions for participation in EU directives, failing policy integration, institutional and political barriers, and failing political uptake of results from participation. We conclude there is a need for more reflexive awareness of the different ways in which participation is defined and practised in contemporary environmental policy making and for a more realistic assessment of possibilities for changes towards more participatory and deliberative decision making.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2688-2704
JournalEnvironment and Planning A
Volume43
Issue number11
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2011

Keywords

  • ADLIB-ART-4691

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Rationales for public participation in environmental policy and governance: practitioners' perspectives'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this