Recapturing the status of indigenous knowledge and its relation to western science

Arie Rip*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

7 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Western science has become epistemically and politically correct over the last two or three centuries (in the West, and then elsewhere). Its practical correctness has been underpinned by claims about utility, about technological and other goodies derived from science – a sort of internal cargo cult, but one which is coming under pressure in the risk society. Indigenous knowledge is becoming practically correct (as an as yet insufficiently tapped resource for development) and politically correct (cf. reconciliation). Is it now also epistemically correct? For that matter, how ‘correct’ is Western science here? I will use sociology of knowledge insights to address these questions, after outlining the structure of debate and practice on indigenous knowledge.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)86-107
Number of pages22
JournalCritical Studies in Teaching and Learning
Volume7
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 30 Jun 2019

Fingerprint

science
knowledge
sociology of knowledge
risk society
reconciliation
ritual
resources

Keywords

  • Cosmovision
  • Epistemic correctness
  • Indigenous knowledge
  • Political correctness
  • Practical correctness
  • Western science

Cite this

@article{44a2692ba2dc4dcd9ebed91bc95a6af9,
title = "Recapturing the status of indigenous knowledge and its relation to western science",
abstract = "Western science has become epistemically and politically correct over the last two or three centuries (in the West, and then elsewhere). Its practical correctness has been underpinned by claims about utility, about technological and other goodies derived from science – a sort of internal cargo cult, but one which is coming under pressure in the risk society. Indigenous knowledge is becoming practically correct (as an as yet insufficiently tapped resource for development) and politically correct (cf. reconciliation). Is it now also epistemically correct? For that matter, how ‘correct’ is Western science here? I will use sociology of knowledge insights to address these questions, after outlining the structure of debate and practice on indigenous knowledge.",
keywords = "Cosmovision, Epistemic correctness, Indigenous knowledge, Political correctness, Practical correctness, Western science",
author = "Arie Rip",
year = "2019",
month = "6",
day = "30",
doi = "10.14426/cristal.v7i1.200",
language = "English",
volume = "7",
pages = "86--107",
journal = "Critical Studies in Teaching and Learning",
issn = "2310-7103",
publisher = "University of the Western Cape",
number = "1",

}

Recapturing the status of indigenous knowledge and its relation to western science. / Rip, Arie.

In: Critical Studies in Teaching and Learning, Vol. 7, No. 1, 30.06.2019, p. 86-107.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Recapturing the status of indigenous knowledge and its relation to western science

AU - Rip, Arie

PY - 2019/6/30

Y1 - 2019/6/30

N2 - Western science has become epistemically and politically correct over the last two or three centuries (in the West, and then elsewhere). Its practical correctness has been underpinned by claims about utility, about technological and other goodies derived from science – a sort of internal cargo cult, but one which is coming under pressure in the risk society. Indigenous knowledge is becoming practically correct (as an as yet insufficiently tapped resource for development) and politically correct (cf. reconciliation). Is it now also epistemically correct? For that matter, how ‘correct’ is Western science here? I will use sociology of knowledge insights to address these questions, after outlining the structure of debate and practice on indigenous knowledge.

AB - Western science has become epistemically and politically correct over the last two or three centuries (in the West, and then elsewhere). Its practical correctness has been underpinned by claims about utility, about technological and other goodies derived from science – a sort of internal cargo cult, but one which is coming under pressure in the risk society. Indigenous knowledge is becoming practically correct (as an as yet insufficiently tapped resource for development) and politically correct (cf. reconciliation). Is it now also epistemically correct? For that matter, how ‘correct’ is Western science here? I will use sociology of knowledge insights to address these questions, after outlining the structure of debate and practice on indigenous knowledge.

KW - Cosmovision

KW - Epistemic correctness

KW - Indigenous knowledge

KW - Political correctness

KW - Practical correctness

KW - Western science

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85069438658&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.14426/cristal.v7i1.200

DO - 10.14426/cristal.v7i1.200

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85069438658

VL - 7

SP - 86

EP - 107

JO - Critical Studies in Teaching and Learning

JF - Critical Studies in Teaching and Learning

SN - 2310-7103

IS - 1

ER -