Abstract
Original language | English |
---|---|
Number of pages | 12 |
Publication status | Published - 1997 |
Event | 5th International Conference on Sheet Metal, SheMet 1997 - University of Ulster, Ulster, United Kingdom Duration: 8 Apr 1997 → 10 Apr 1997 Conference number: 5 |
Conference
Conference | 5th International Conference on Sheet Metal, SheMet 1997 |
---|---|
Abbreviated title | SheMet |
Country | United Kingdom |
City | Ulster |
Period | 8/04/97 → 10/04/97 |
Fingerprint
Cite this
}
Recent developments in finite element simulations of the deep drawing process. / Meinders, Vincent T.; Carleer, B.D.; Vegter, H.; Huetink, Han.
1997. Paper presented at 5th International Conference on Sheet Metal, SheMet 1997, Ulster, United Kingdom.Research output: Contribution to conference › Paper › Academic
TY - CONF
T1 - Recent developments in finite element simulations of the deep drawing process
AU - Meinders, Vincent T.
AU - Carleer, B.D.
AU - Vegter, H.
AU - Huetink, Han
PY - 1997
Y1 - 1997
N2 - Some new developments in a finite element code for the deep drawing process are presented in this paper. First the phenomenon of friction is treated. A Stribeck friction model has been developed which accounts for the dependency of the friction coefficient on the local contact conditions. Secondly a new yield criterion has been developed by Vegter. This Vegter yield criterion is based on multi-axial stress states. Finally attention will be paid to reduce the CPUtime of a simulation when drawbeads are used. An equivalent drawbead model has been developed to avoid an enormous increase in calculation time.
AB - Some new developments in a finite element code for the deep drawing process are presented in this paper. First the phenomenon of friction is treated. A Stribeck friction model has been developed which accounts for the dependency of the friction coefficient on the local contact conditions. Secondly a new yield criterion has been developed by Vegter. This Vegter yield criterion is based on multi-axial stress states. Finally attention will be paid to reduce the CPUtime of a simulation when drawbeads are used. An equivalent drawbead model has been developed to avoid an enormous increase in calculation time.
M3 - Paper
ER -