Reciprocal inhibition between motor neurons of the tibialis anterior an triceps surae in humans

Utku S. Yavuz, Francesco Negro, Robin Diedrichs, Dario Farina

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

4 Citations (Scopus)
16 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Motor neurons innervating antagonist muscles receive reciprocal inhibitory afferent inputs to facilitate the joint movement in the two directions. The present study investigates the mutual transmission of reciprocal inhibitory afferent inputs between the tibialis anterior (TA) and triceps surae (soleus and medial gastrocnemius) motor units. We assessed this mutual mechanism in large populations of motor units for building a statistical distribution of the inhibition amplitudes during standardized input to the motor neuron pools to minimize the effect of modulatory pathways. Single motor unit activities were identified using high-density surface electromyography (HDsEMG) recorded from the TA, soleus (Sol), and medial gastrocnemius (GM) muscles during isometric dorsi- and plantarflexion. Reciprocal inhibition on the antagonist muscle was elicited by electrical stimulation of the tibial (TN) or common peroneal nerves (CPN). The probability density distributions of reflex strength for each muscle were estimated to examine the strength of mutual transmission of reciprocal inhibitory input. The results showed that the strength of reciprocal inhibition in the TA motor units was fourfold greater than for the GM and the Sol motor units. This suggests an asymmetric transmission of reciprocal inhibition between ankle extensor and flexor muscles. This asymmetry cannot be explained by differences in motor unit type composition between the investigated muscles since we sampled low-threshold motor units in all cases. Therefore, the differences observed for the strength of inhibition are presumably due to a differential reciprocal spindle afferent input and the relative contribution of nonreciprocal inhibitory pathways.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1699-1706
JournalJournal of neurophysiology
Volume119
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 May 2018

Keywords

  • high-density EMG
  • reciprocal inhibition
  • single motor unit
  • synaptic distribution

Cite this

Yavuz, Utku S. ; Negro, Francesco ; Diedrichs, Robin ; Farina, Dario. / Reciprocal inhibition between motor neurons of the tibialis anterior an triceps surae in humans. In: Journal of neurophysiology. 2018 ; Vol. 119, No. 5. pp. 1699-1706.
@article{5af40d2b63ce482999d163c23af35d4e,
title = "Reciprocal inhibition between motor neurons of the tibialis anterior an triceps surae in humans",
abstract = "Motor neurons innervating antagonist muscles receive reciprocal inhibitory afferent inputs to facilitate the joint movement in the two directions. The present study investigates the mutual transmission of reciprocal inhibitory afferent inputs between the tibialis anterior (TA) and triceps surae (soleus and medial gastrocnemius) motor units. We assessed this mutual mechanism in large populations of motor units for building a statistical distribution of the inhibition amplitudes during standardized input to the motor neuron pools to minimize the effect of modulatory pathways. Single motor unit activities were identified using high-density surface electromyography (HDsEMG) recorded from the TA, soleus (Sol), and medial gastrocnemius (GM) muscles during isometric dorsi- and plantarflexion. Reciprocal inhibition on the antagonist muscle was elicited by electrical stimulation of the tibial (TN) or common peroneal nerves (CPN). The probability density distributions of reflex strength for each muscle were estimated to examine the strength of mutual transmission of reciprocal inhibitory input. The results showed that the strength of reciprocal inhibition in the TA motor units was fourfold greater than for the GM and the Sol motor units. This suggests an asymmetric transmission of reciprocal inhibition between ankle extensor and flexor muscles. This asymmetry cannot be explained by differences in motor unit type composition between the investigated muscles since we sampled low-threshold motor units in all cases. Therefore, the differences observed for the strength of inhibition are presumably due to a differential reciprocal spindle afferent input and the relative contribution of nonreciprocal inhibitory pathways.",
keywords = "high-density EMG, reciprocal inhibition, single motor unit, synaptic distribution",
author = "Yavuz, {Utku S.} and Francesco Negro and Robin Diedrichs and Dario Farina",
year = "2018",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1152/jn.00424.2017",
language = "English",
volume = "119",
pages = "1699--1706",
journal = "Journal of neurophysiology",
issn = "0022-3077",
publisher = "American Physiological Society",
number = "5",

}

Reciprocal inhibition between motor neurons of the tibialis anterior an triceps surae in humans. / Yavuz, Utku S.; Negro, Francesco; Diedrichs, Robin; Farina, Dario.

In: Journal of neurophysiology, Vol. 119, No. 5, 01.05.2018, p. 1699-1706.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reciprocal inhibition between motor neurons of the tibialis anterior an triceps surae in humans

AU - Yavuz, Utku S.

AU - Negro, Francesco

AU - Diedrichs, Robin

AU - Farina, Dario

PY - 2018/5/1

Y1 - 2018/5/1

N2 - Motor neurons innervating antagonist muscles receive reciprocal inhibitory afferent inputs to facilitate the joint movement in the two directions. The present study investigates the mutual transmission of reciprocal inhibitory afferent inputs between the tibialis anterior (TA) and triceps surae (soleus and medial gastrocnemius) motor units. We assessed this mutual mechanism in large populations of motor units for building a statistical distribution of the inhibition amplitudes during standardized input to the motor neuron pools to minimize the effect of modulatory pathways. Single motor unit activities were identified using high-density surface electromyography (HDsEMG) recorded from the TA, soleus (Sol), and medial gastrocnemius (GM) muscles during isometric dorsi- and plantarflexion. Reciprocal inhibition on the antagonist muscle was elicited by electrical stimulation of the tibial (TN) or common peroneal nerves (CPN). The probability density distributions of reflex strength for each muscle were estimated to examine the strength of mutual transmission of reciprocal inhibitory input. The results showed that the strength of reciprocal inhibition in the TA motor units was fourfold greater than for the GM and the Sol motor units. This suggests an asymmetric transmission of reciprocal inhibition between ankle extensor and flexor muscles. This asymmetry cannot be explained by differences in motor unit type composition between the investigated muscles since we sampled low-threshold motor units in all cases. Therefore, the differences observed for the strength of inhibition are presumably due to a differential reciprocal spindle afferent input and the relative contribution of nonreciprocal inhibitory pathways.

AB - Motor neurons innervating antagonist muscles receive reciprocal inhibitory afferent inputs to facilitate the joint movement in the two directions. The present study investigates the mutual transmission of reciprocal inhibitory afferent inputs between the tibialis anterior (TA) and triceps surae (soleus and medial gastrocnemius) motor units. We assessed this mutual mechanism in large populations of motor units for building a statistical distribution of the inhibition amplitudes during standardized input to the motor neuron pools to minimize the effect of modulatory pathways. Single motor unit activities were identified using high-density surface electromyography (HDsEMG) recorded from the TA, soleus (Sol), and medial gastrocnemius (GM) muscles during isometric dorsi- and plantarflexion. Reciprocal inhibition on the antagonist muscle was elicited by electrical stimulation of the tibial (TN) or common peroneal nerves (CPN). The probability density distributions of reflex strength for each muscle were estimated to examine the strength of mutual transmission of reciprocal inhibitory input. The results showed that the strength of reciprocal inhibition in the TA motor units was fourfold greater than for the GM and the Sol motor units. This suggests an asymmetric transmission of reciprocal inhibition between ankle extensor and flexor muscles. This asymmetry cannot be explained by differences in motor unit type composition between the investigated muscles since we sampled low-threshold motor units in all cases. Therefore, the differences observed for the strength of inhibition are presumably due to a differential reciprocal spindle afferent input and the relative contribution of nonreciprocal inhibitory pathways.

KW - high-density EMG

KW - reciprocal inhibition

KW - single motor unit

KW - synaptic distribution

U2 - 10.1152/jn.00424.2017

DO - 10.1152/jn.00424.2017

M3 - Article

VL - 119

SP - 1699

EP - 1706

JO - Journal of neurophysiology

JF - Journal of neurophysiology

SN - 0022-3077

IS - 5

ER -