Reconciliation responses, blame, and expressions of guilt or shame

Caroline Kamau, Roger Giner-Sorolla, Sven Zebel

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Recipients of intergroup apologies have been found to prefer expressions of shame over guilt. However, there is little research comparing the responses of a wronged group with those of a blamed group. Kenyans/Britons evaluated guilt/shame statements about colonialism, with blame measured as the assignment of collective guilt to Britain. Among Britons, there was a significant interaction, with high in group blamers expecting more reconciliation from shame than from guilt, and vice versa for low in group blamers. Among Kenyans, there was no main effect of blame, but more reconciliation was expected from shame than from guilt. Wronged groups thus appear to prefer shame over guilt, whereas preference for guilt/shame among members of a blamed group depends on the level of in-group blame.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)E287-E292
JournalJournal of applied social psychology
Volume43
Issue numbersuppl. S2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2013

Fingerprint

Shame
Guilt
Colonialism
Research

Keywords

  • METIS-291258
  • IR-87429

Cite this

Kamau, Caroline ; Giner-Sorolla, Roger ; Zebel, Sven. / Reconciliation responses, blame, and expressions of guilt or shame. In: Journal of applied social psychology. 2013 ; Vol. 43, No. suppl. S2. pp. E287-E292.
@article{9fc4a5c34913410f97aaa909a3bdd1df,
title = "Reconciliation responses, blame, and expressions of guilt or shame",
abstract = "Recipients of intergroup apologies have been found to prefer expressions of shame over guilt. However, there is little research comparing the responses of a wronged group with those of a blamed group. Kenyans/Britons evaluated guilt/shame statements about colonialism, with blame measured as the assignment of collective guilt to Britain. Among Britons, there was a significant interaction, with high in group blamers expecting more reconciliation from shame than from guilt, and vice versa for low in group blamers. Among Kenyans, there was no main effect of blame, but more reconciliation was expected from shame than from guilt. Wronged groups thus appear to prefer shame over guilt, whereas preference for guilt/shame among members of a blamed group depends on the level of in-group blame.",
keywords = "METIS-291258, IR-87429",
author = "Caroline Kamau and Roger Giner-Sorolla and Sven Zebel",
year = "2013",
doi = "10.1111/jasp.12048",
language = "English",
volume = "43",
pages = "E287--E292",
journal = "Journal of applied social psychology",
issn = "0021-9029",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "suppl. S2",

}

Reconciliation responses, blame, and expressions of guilt or shame. / Kamau, Caroline; Giner-Sorolla, Roger; Zebel, Sven.

In: Journal of applied social psychology, Vol. 43, No. suppl. S2, 2013, p. E287-E292.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reconciliation responses, blame, and expressions of guilt or shame

AU - Kamau, Caroline

AU - Giner-Sorolla, Roger

AU - Zebel, Sven

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - Recipients of intergroup apologies have been found to prefer expressions of shame over guilt. However, there is little research comparing the responses of a wronged group with those of a blamed group. Kenyans/Britons evaluated guilt/shame statements about colonialism, with blame measured as the assignment of collective guilt to Britain. Among Britons, there was a significant interaction, with high in group blamers expecting more reconciliation from shame than from guilt, and vice versa for low in group blamers. Among Kenyans, there was no main effect of blame, but more reconciliation was expected from shame than from guilt. Wronged groups thus appear to prefer shame over guilt, whereas preference for guilt/shame among members of a blamed group depends on the level of in-group blame.

AB - Recipients of intergroup apologies have been found to prefer expressions of shame over guilt. However, there is little research comparing the responses of a wronged group with those of a blamed group. Kenyans/Britons evaluated guilt/shame statements about colonialism, with blame measured as the assignment of collective guilt to Britain. Among Britons, there was a significant interaction, with high in group blamers expecting more reconciliation from shame than from guilt, and vice versa for low in group blamers. Among Kenyans, there was no main effect of blame, but more reconciliation was expected from shame than from guilt. Wronged groups thus appear to prefer shame over guilt, whereas preference for guilt/shame among members of a blamed group depends on the level of in-group blame.

KW - METIS-291258

KW - IR-87429

U2 - 10.1111/jasp.12048

DO - 10.1111/jasp.12048

M3 - Article

VL - 43

SP - E287-E292

JO - Journal of applied social psychology

JF - Journal of applied social psychology

SN - 0021-9029

IS - suppl. S2

ER -