TY - JOUR
T1 - Recording stretching response of single polymer chains adsorbed on solid substrates
AU - Grebikova, Lucie
AU - Radiom, Milad
AU - Maroni, Plinio
AU - Schlüter, A. Dieter
AU - Borkovec, Michal
PY - 2016/10/12
Y1 - 2016/10/12
N2 - Various techniques to measure the force-extension relationship of individual polymer chains with the atomic force microscope (AFM) are compared. Reliable stretching force profiles can be obtained with the nano-handling technique, which involves imaging of the measured individual polymer molecules prior and after the force experiment. Results originating from the classical pulling technique, which relies on dense adsorbed polymer layers, must be interpreted with care. Comparison with the nano-handling technique reveals that the stretching response of individual molecules can be obtained with the pulling technique, provided the adsorbed polymer layer is dilute. For denser adsorbed layers, such experiments may not reflect the correct stretching response. The discrepancies seem to be related to polymer–polymer interactions and entanglements within the adsorbed layer. AFM imaging of the adsorbed layers can provide an indication concerning the relevance of such entanglement effects. Similar caveats apply to fishing experiments, where polymers are adsorbed to the AFM tip and not to the substrate.
AB - Various techniques to measure the force-extension relationship of individual polymer chains with the atomic force microscope (AFM) are compared. Reliable stretching force profiles can be obtained with the nano-handling technique, which involves imaging of the measured individual polymer molecules prior and after the force experiment. Results originating from the classical pulling technique, which relies on dense adsorbed polymer layers, must be interpreted with care. Comparison with the nano-handling technique reveals that the stretching response of individual molecules can be obtained with the pulling technique, provided the adsorbed polymer layer is dilute. For denser adsorbed layers, such experiments may not reflect the correct stretching response. The discrepancies seem to be related to polymer–polymer interactions and entanglements within the adsorbed layer. AFM imaging of the adsorbed layers can provide an indication concerning the relevance of such entanglement effects. Similar caveats apply to fishing experiments, where polymers are adsorbed to the AFM tip and not to the substrate.
KW - Atomic force microscopy
KW - Dendronized polymers
KW - Force spectroscopy
KW - Polymer elasticity
KW - Single molecule
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84960830717&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.polymer.2016.02.045
DO - 10.1016/j.polymer.2016.02.045
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84960830717
SN - 0032-3861
VL - 102
SP - 350
EP - 362
JO - Polymer
JF - Polymer
ER -