TY - JOUR
T1 - Relevance of Somatosensory Evoked Potential Amplitude After Cardiac Arrest
AU - Glimmerveen, Astrid B.
AU - Keijzer, Hanneke M.
AU - Ruijter, Barry J.
AU - Tjepkema-Cloostermans, Marleen C.
AU - van Putten, Michel J.A.M.
AU - Hofmeijer, Jeannette
PY - 2020/4/28
Y1 - 2020/4/28
N2 - Objective: We present relations of SSEP amplitude with neurological outcome and of SSEP amplitude with EEG amplitude in comatose patients after cardiac arrest. Methods: This is a post hoc analysis of a prospective cohort study in comatose patients after cardiac arrest. Amplitude of SSEP recordings obtained within 48–72 h, and EEG patterns obtained at 12 and 24h after cardiac arrest were related to good (CPC 1-2) or poor (CPC 3-5) outcome at 6 months. In 39% of the study population multiple SSEP measurements were performed. Additionally, SSEP amplitude was related to mean EEG amplitude. Results: We included 138 patients (77% poor outcome). Absent SSEP responses, a N20 amplitude <0.4 μV within 48–72 h, and suppressed or synchronous EEG with suppressed background at 12 or 24 h after cardiac arrest were invariably associated with a poor outcome. Combined, these tests reached a sensitivity for prediction of poor outcome up to 58 at 100% specificity. N20 amplitude increased with a mean of 0.55 μV per day in patients with a poor outcome, and remained stable with a good outcome. There was no statistically significant correlation between SSEP and EEG amplitudes in 182 combined SSEP and EEG measurements (R2 < 0.01). Conclusions: N20 amplitude <0.4 μV is invariably associated with poor outcome. There is no correlation between SSEP and EEG amplitude. Significance: SSEP amplitude analysis may contribute to outcome prediction after cardiac arrest.
AB - Objective: We present relations of SSEP amplitude with neurological outcome and of SSEP amplitude with EEG amplitude in comatose patients after cardiac arrest. Methods: This is a post hoc analysis of a prospective cohort study in comatose patients after cardiac arrest. Amplitude of SSEP recordings obtained within 48–72 h, and EEG patterns obtained at 12 and 24h after cardiac arrest were related to good (CPC 1-2) or poor (CPC 3-5) outcome at 6 months. In 39% of the study population multiple SSEP measurements were performed. Additionally, SSEP amplitude was related to mean EEG amplitude. Results: We included 138 patients (77% poor outcome). Absent SSEP responses, a N20 amplitude <0.4 μV within 48–72 h, and suppressed or synchronous EEG with suppressed background at 12 or 24 h after cardiac arrest were invariably associated with a poor outcome. Combined, these tests reached a sensitivity for prediction of poor outcome up to 58 at 100% specificity. N20 amplitude increased with a mean of 0.55 μV per day in patients with a poor outcome, and remained stable with a good outcome. There was no statistically significant correlation between SSEP and EEG amplitudes in 182 combined SSEP and EEG measurements (R2 < 0.01). Conclusions: N20 amplitude <0.4 μV is invariably associated with poor outcome. There is no correlation between SSEP and EEG amplitude. Significance: SSEP amplitude analysis may contribute to outcome prediction after cardiac arrest.
KW - cardiac arrest
KW - EEG
KW - postanoxic coma
KW - prognosis
KW - SSEP
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85084463666&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3389/fneur.2020.00335
DO - 10.3389/fneur.2020.00335
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85084463666
SN - 1664-2295
VL - 11
JO - Frontiers in neurology
JF - Frontiers in neurology
M1 - 335
ER -