Reply: Absence of Evidence for the Ultimate Regime in Two-Dimensional Rayleigh-Benard Convection

Xiaojue Zhu; Varghese Mathai; Richard J. A. M. Stevens; Roberto Verzicco; Detlef Lohse

doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.123.259402

Reply: Absence of Evidence for the Ultimate Regime in Two-Dimensional Rayleigh-Benard Convection

Xiaojue Zhu, Varghese Mathai, Richard J. A. M. Stevens, Roberto Verzicco, Detlef Lohse

Physics of Fluids

Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/Letter to the editor › Academic › peer-review

14 Citations (Scopus)

181 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

In their Comment [1] Doering et al. question our numerically found [2] onset of a transition to the ultimate regime of 2D Rayleigh-Bénard (RB) convection. We disagree with their reasoning.

Original language	English
Article number	259402
Journal	Physical review letters
Volume	123
Issue number	25
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.123.259402
Publication status	Published - 16 Dec 2019

Access to Document

10.1103/PhysRevLett.123.259402

PhysRevLett.123.259402Final published version, 114 KB

Cite this

@article{9acd3a18d97a41b39b5a895637422906,

title = "Reply: Absence of Evidence for the Ultimate Regime in Two-Dimensional Rayleigh-Benard Convection",

abstract = "In their Comment [1] Doering et al. question our numerically found [2] onset of a transition to the ultimate regime of 2D Rayleigh-B{\'e}nard (RB) convection. We disagree with their reasoning.",

author = "Xiaojue Zhu and Varghese Mathai and Stevens, {Richard J. A. M.} and Roberto Verzicco and Detlef Lohse",

year = "2019",

month = dec,

day = "16",

doi = "10.1103/PhysRevLett.123.259402",

language = "English",

volume = "123",

journal = "Physical review letters",

issn = "0031-9007",

publisher = "American Physical Society",

number = "25",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reply: Absence of Evidence for the Ultimate Regime in Two-Dimensional Rayleigh-Benard Convection

AU - Zhu, Xiaojue

AU - Mathai, Varghese

AU - Stevens, Richard J. A. M.

AU - Verzicco, Roberto

AU - Lohse, Detlef

PY - 2019/12/16

Y1 - 2019/12/16

N2 - In their Comment [1] Doering et al. question our numerically found [2] onset of a transition to the ultimate regime of 2D Rayleigh-Bénard (RB) convection. We disagree with their reasoning.

AB - In their Comment [1] Doering et al. question our numerically found [2] onset of a transition to the ultimate regime of 2D Rayleigh-Bénard (RB) convection. We disagree with their reasoning.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85077243972&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1103/PhysRevLett.123.259402

DO - 10.1103/PhysRevLett.123.259402

M3 - Comment/Letter to the editor

SN - 0031-9007

VL - 123

JO - Physical review letters

JF - Physical review letters

IS - 25

M1 - 259402

ER -

Reply: Absence of Evidence for the Ultimate Regime in Two-Dimensional Rayleigh-Benard Convection

Abstract

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Transition to the Ultimate Regime in Two-Dimensional Rayleigh-Bénard Convection

Cite this