Reproducible research and GIScience: an evaluation using AGILE conference papers

Daniel Nüst (Corresponding Author), Carlos Granell, Barbara Hofer, Markus Konkol, Frank O. Ostermann, Rusne Sileryte, Valentina Cerutti

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

11 Citations (Scopus)
7 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The demand for reproducible research is on the rise in disciplines concerned with data analysis and computational methods. Therefore, we reviewed current recommendations for reproducible research and translated them into criteria for assessing the reproducibility of articles in the field of geographic information science (GIScience). Using this criteria, we assessed a sample of GIScience studies from the Association of Geographic Information Laboratories in Europe (AGILE) conference series, and we collected feedback about the assessment from the study authors. Results from the author feedback indicate that although authors support the concept of performing reproducible research, the incentives for doing this in practice are too small. Therefore, we propose concrete actions for individual researchers and the GIScience conference series to improve transparency and reproducibility. For example, to support researchers in producing reproducible work, the GIScience conference series could offer awards and paper badges, provide author guidelines for computational research, and publish articles in Open Access formats.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere5072
Pages (from-to)1-23
Number of pages23
JournalPeerJ
Volume6
Early online date24 Feb 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 13 Jul 2018
Externally publishedYes

    Fingerprint

Keywords

  • ITC-ISI-JOURNAL-ARTICLE
  • ITC-GOLD

Cite this

Nüst, D., Granell, C., Hofer, B., Konkol, M., Ostermann, F. O., Sileryte, R., & Cerutti, V. (2018). Reproducible research and GIScience: an evaluation using AGILE conference papers. PeerJ, 6, 1-23. [e5072]. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.5072