TY - JOUR
T1 - Respiratory Biofeedback Does Not Facilitate Lowering Arousal in Meditation Through Virtual Reality
AU - Tinga, Angelica M.
AU - Nyklíček, Ivan
AU - Jansen, Michel-Pierre
AU - de Back, Tycho T.
AU - Louwerse, Max M.
N1 - Springer deal
PY - 2019/3
Y1 - 2019/3
N2 - The current study examined the effectiveness of respiratory biofeedback in lowering subjective and objective arousal after stress. Participants were presented with a meditation session in virtual reality while subjective and objective arousal were measured, the latter measured through ECG and EEG. Three conditions were used: (a) a respiratory biofeedback condition, in which visual feedback was paired to breathing; (b) a control feedback placebo condition, in which visual feedback was not paired to breathing; and (c) a control no-feedback condition, in which no visual feedback was used. Subjective and objective arousal decreased during meditation after stress in all conditions, demonstrating recovery after stress during meditation in virtual reality. However, the reduction in arousal (on all outcome measures combined and heart rate specifically) was largest in the control feedback placebo condition, in which no biofeedback was used, indicating that respiratory biofeedback had no additional value in reducing arousal. The findings of the current study highlight the importance of including a control feedback placebo condition in order to establish the exact additional value of biofeedback and offer insights in applying cost-effective virtual reality meditation training.
AB - The current study examined the effectiveness of respiratory biofeedback in lowering subjective and objective arousal after stress. Participants were presented with a meditation session in virtual reality while subjective and objective arousal were measured, the latter measured through ECG and EEG. Three conditions were used: (a) a respiratory biofeedback condition, in which visual feedback was paired to breathing; (b) a control feedback placebo condition, in which visual feedback was not paired to breathing; and (c) a control no-feedback condition, in which no visual feedback was used. Subjective and objective arousal decreased during meditation after stress in all conditions, demonstrating recovery after stress during meditation in virtual reality. However, the reduction in arousal (on all outcome measures combined and heart rate specifically) was largest in the control feedback placebo condition, in which no biofeedback was used, indicating that respiratory biofeedback had no additional value in reducing arousal. The findings of the current study highlight the importance of including a control feedback placebo condition in order to establish the exact additional value of biofeedback and offer insights in applying cost-effective virtual reality meditation training.
KW - UT-Hybrid-D
KW - Biofeedback
KW - Virtual Reality (VR)
KW - Arousal
KW - Respiration
KW - EEG
KW - Meditation
UR - https://research.tilburguniversity.edu/en/publications/db45e325-9e07-441d-8aa4-061fe8887970
U2 - 10.1007/s10484-018-9421-5
DO - 10.1007/s10484-018-9421-5
M3 - Article
C2 - 30377895
SN - 1090-0586
VL - 44
SP - 51
EP - 59
JO - Applied psychophysiology and biofeedback
JF - Applied psychophysiology and biofeedback
IS - 1
ER -