Abstract
Addressing environmental challenges requires structural changes across industries, often threatening individuals’ occupational roles. Yet how such identity threats are experienced and managed remains underexplored. We conducted a qualitative study of Dutch farmers affected by new sustainability regulations. Our analysis shows that farmers cognitively appraised these disruptions either as threats to autonomy, competence, and relatedness or as challenges offering opportunities to redefine their occupational identity. These appraisals were closely tied to emotions such as anger, sadness, fear, uncertainty, and hope. Depending on this interplay of cognitions and emotions, farmers adopted coping strategies including exiting, opposing, maintaining, or redefining their identity—each with distinct implications for sustainability transitions. Our study contributes to transition research by illuminating micro-processes of identity change and demonstrating how occupational identity shapes responses to phase-outs. We suggest that policymakers can support transitions by addressing identity-related needs and framing occupational identity changes as challenges rather than threats.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | 101122 |
| Number of pages | 14 |
| Journal | Environmental innovation and societal transitions |
| Volume | 60 |
| Early online date | 13 Mar 2026 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Jun 2026 |
Keywords
- UT-Hybrid-D
- Occupational identity
- Identity threat
- Transition pain
- Emotions
- Coping strategies
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Responses to occupational identity threats in sustainability transitions: A qualitative study of Dutch farmers'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver