Abstract
Methods: To obtain information on this aspect, an invitation to participate in a web-based questionnaire was sent to a random sample of 750 GP practices. Of this sample 111 GP practices returned a complete questionnaire. Data was analysed by using descriptive statistics.
Results: Results show that there is not always attention for quality control measures such as checking storage conditions, executing calibration, and maintenance. In addition, universal hygienic measures, such as washing hands before taking a blood sample, are not always followed. Refresher courses on the use of POC tests are hardly organized. Only a few of the GPs contact the manufacturer of the device when a device failure occurs. Well-controlled aspects include patient identification and actions taken when ambiguous test results are obtained.
Conclusions: We observed a number of risks for errors with POC tests in GP practices that may be reduced by proper training of personnel, introduction of standard operating procedures and measures for quality control and improved hygiene. To encourage proper use of POCT in general practices, a national POCT guideline, dedicated to primary care and in line with ISO standards, should be introduced.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | 9 |
| Journal | BMC family practice |
| Volume | 16 |
| Issue number | 9 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2015 |
Fingerprint
Keywords
- IR-95832
- METIS-310465
- Blood glucose
- Test strip
- Blood glucose test
- Solo practice
Cite this
}
Results of a survey among GP practices on how they manage patient safety aspects related to point-of-care testing in every day practice. / de Vries, Claudette (Corresponding Author); Doggen, Carine; Hilbers, Ellen; Verheij, Robert; IJzerman, Maarten; Geertsma, Robert; Kusters, Ron.
In: BMC family practice, Vol. 16, No. 9, 9, 2015.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Academic › peer-review
TY - JOUR
T1 - Results of a survey among GP practices on how they manage patient safety aspects related to point-of-care testing in every day practice
AU - de Vries, Claudette
AU - Doggen, Carine
AU - Hilbers, Ellen
AU - Verheij, Robert
AU - IJzerman, Maarten
AU - Geertsma, Robert
AU - Kusters, Ron
N1 - Open access
PY - 2015
Y1 - 2015
N2 - Background: Point-of-care (POC) tests are devices or test strips that can be used near or at the site where care is delivered to patients, enabling a relatively fast diagnosis. Although many general practitioners (GPs) in the Netherlands are using POC tests in their practice, little is known on how they manage the corresponding patient safety aspects.Methods: To obtain information on this aspect, an invitation to participate in a web-based questionnaire was sent to a random sample of 750 GP practices. Of this sample 111 GP practices returned a complete questionnaire. Data was analysed by using descriptive statistics.Results: Results show that there is not always attention for quality control measures such as checking storage conditions, executing calibration, and maintenance. In addition, universal hygienic measures, such as washing hands before taking a blood sample, are not always followed. Refresher courses on the use of POC tests are hardly organized. Only a few of the GPs contact the manufacturer of the device when a device failure occurs. Well-controlled aspects include patient identification and actions taken when ambiguous test results are obtained.Conclusions: We observed a number of risks for errors with POC tests in GP practices that may be reduced by proper training of personnel, introduction of standard operating procedures and measures for quality control and improved hygiene. To encourage proper use of POCT in general practices, a national POCT guideline, dedicated to primary care and in line with ISO standards, should be introduced.
AB - Background: Point-of-care (POC) tests are devices or test strips that can be used near or at the site where care is delivered to patients, enabling a relatively fast diagnosis. Although many general practitioners (GPs) in the Netherlands are using POC tests in their practice, little is known on how they manage the corresponding patient safety aspects.Methods: To obtain information on this aspect, an invitation to participate in a web-based questionnaire was sent to a random sample of 750 GP practices. Of this sample 111 GP practices returned a complete questionnaire. Data was analysed by using descriptive statistics.Results: Results show that there is not always attention for quality control measures such as checking storage conditions, executing calibration, and maintenance. In addition, universal hygienic measures, such as washing hands before taking a blood sample, are not always followed. Refresher courses on the use of POC tests are hardly organized. Only a few of the GPs contact the manufacturer of the device when a device failure occurs. Well-controlled aspects include patient identification and actions taken when ambiguous test results are obtained.Conclusions: We observed a number of risks for errors with POC tests in GP practices that may be reduced by proper training of personnel, introduction of standard operating procedures and measures for quality control and improved hygiene. To encourage proper use of POCT in general practices, a national POCT guideline, dedicated to primary care and in line with ISO standards, should be introduced.
KW - IR-95832
KW - METIS-310465
KW - Blood glucose
KW - Test strip
KW - Blood glucose test
KW - Solo practice
U2 - 10.1186/s12875-014-0217-2
DO - 10.1186/s12875-014-0217-2
M3 - Article
VL - 16
JO - BMC family practice
JF - BMC family practice
SN - 1471-2296
IS - 9
M1 - 9
ER -