Abstract
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 394-401 |
| Journal | Molecular oncology |
| Volume | 3 |
| Issue number | 5-6 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2009 |
Fingerprint
Keywords
- Nanotechnology
- Genomics
- Review
- Early Technology Assessment
- Oncology
- Dynamics
Cite this
}
Review on Early Technology Assessments of Nanotechnologies in Oncology. / Retèl, Valesca P.; Hummel, Marjan J.M.; van Harten, Wim H.
In: Molecular oncology, Vol. 3, No. 5-6, 2009, p. 394-401.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Academic › peer-review
TY - JOUR
T1 - Review on Early Technology Assessments of Nanotechnologies in Oncology
AU - Retèl, Valesca P.
AU - Hummel, Marjan J.M.
AU - van Harten, Wim H.
PY - 2009
Y1 - 2009
N2 - Nanotechnology is expected to play an increasingly important role in the diagnostics, prognostics, and management of targeted cancer treatments. While papers have described promising results for nanotechnology in experimental settings, the translation of fundamental research into clinical applications has yet to be widely adopted. In future, policy makers will need to anticipate new developments for clinical implementation and introduce technology assessments. Here we present an overview of the literature on the technology assessments that have already been undertaken on early stage nanotechnology in cancer care, with particular emphasis placed on clinical efficacy, efficiency, logistics, patient-related features and technology dynamics. Owing to the current stage of development of most nanotechnologies, we found only a limited number of publications describing the application of either Health Technology Assessment (HTA) or Constructive Technology Assessment (CTA). In spite of the promising conclusions of most papers concerning the benefits of clinical implementation, actual clinically relevant applications were rarely encountered, and so far only a few publications report application of systematic forms of technology assessment. Most articles consider aspects of environmental safety, regulation and ethics, often mentioning the need to investigate such issues more thoroughly. Evaluation of financial and organizational aspects is often missing. In order to obtain a realistic perspective on the translation and implementation process there is a need for a broad and systematic evaluation of nanotechnologies at early stages of development. Assessment methods taking technology dynamics into account, such as Constructive Technology Assessment (CTA) should be considered for evaluation purposes.
AB - Nanotechnology is expected to play an increasingly important role in the diagnostics, prognostics, and management of targeted cancer treatments. While papers have described promising results for nanotechnology in experimental settings, the translation of fundamental research into clinical applications has yet to be widely adopted. In future, policy makers will need to anticipate new developments for clinical implementation and introduce technology assessments. Here we present an overview of the literature on the technology assessments that have already been undertaken on early stage nanotechnology in cancer care, with particular emphasis placed on clinical efficacy, efficiency, logistics, patient-related features and technology dynamics. Owing to the current stage of development of most nanotechnologies, we found only a limited number of publications describing the application of either Health Technology Assessment (HTA) or Constructive Technology Assessment (CTA). In spite of the promising conclusions of most papers concerning the benefits of clinical implementation, actual clinically relevant applications were rarely encountered, and so far only a few publications report application of systematic forms of technology assessment. Most articles consider aspects of environmental safety, regulation and ethics, often mentioning the need to investigate such issues more thoroughly. Evaluation of financial and organizational aspects is often missing. In order to obtain a realistic perspective on the translation and implementation process there is a need for a broad and systematic evaluation of nanotechnologies at early stages of development. Assessment methods taking technology dynamics into account, such as Constructive Technology Assessment (CTA) should be considered for evaluation purposes.
KW - Nanotechnology
KW - Genomics
KW - Review
KW - Early Technology Assessment
KW - Oncology
KW - Dynamics
U2 - 10.1016/j.molonc.2009.05.001
DO - 10.1016/j.molonc.2009.05.001
M3 - Article
VL - 3
SP - 394
EP - 401
JO - Molecular oncology
JF - Molecular oncology
SN - 1574-7891
IS - 5-6
ER -