Revisiting public debate on Genetic Modification and Genetically Modified Organisms. Explanations for contemporary Dutch public attitudes

Lucien Hanssen, Anne M. Dijkstra, Susanne Sleenhoff, Lynn J. Frewer, Jan M. Gutteling

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

1 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Genetic Modification (GM) has been a topic of public debates during the 1990s and 2000s. In this paper we explore the relative importance of two hypothesized explanations for these controversies: (i) people's general attitude toward science and technology and (ii) their trust in governance, in GM actors, and in GM regulations, in explaining the Dutch public's Attitude toward GM applications, and in addition to that, the public's GM Information seeking behaviour. This will be conducted through the application of representative survey methodology. The results indicate that Attitudes toward GM applications are best predicted by both the attitude toward science and technology and three trust measures. GM information seeking is predicted by gender and educational level, as well as attitude toward science and technology, trust in organisations and trust in regulations (negative). Overall, psychological variables seem better predictors than demographics. Implications for future research on information seeking behaviour are discussed.

Original languageEnglish
Article numberA01
JournalJournal of Science Communication
Volume17
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Oct 2018

Fingerprint

information-seeking behavior
science
regulation
governance
gender
methodology

Keywords

  • Public perception of science and technology
  • Risk communication
  • Science communication: theory and models

Cite this

@article{4fb4fb53195e4a58a6f80231ba82671c,
title = "Revisiting public debate on Genetic Modification and Genetically Modified Organisms. Explanations for contemporary Dutch public attitudes",
abstract = "Genetic Modification (GM) has been a topic of public debates during the 1990s and 2000s. In this paper we explore the relative importance of two hypothesized explanations for these controversies: (i) people's general attitude toward science and technology and (ii) their trust in governance, in GM actors, and in GM regulations, in explaining the Dutch public's Attitude toward GM applications, and in addition to that, the public's GM Information seeking behaviour. This will be conducted through the application of representative survey methodology. The results indicate that Attitudes toward GM applications are best predicted by both the attitude toward science and technology and three trust measures. GM information seeking is predicted by gender and educational level, as well as attitude toward science and technology, trust in organisations and trust in regulations (negative). Overall, psychological variables seem better predictors than demographics. Implications for future research on information seeking behaviour are discussed.",
keywords = "Public perception of science and technology, Risk communication, Science communication: theory and models",
author = "Lucien Hanssen and Dijkstra, {Anne M.} and Susanne Sleenhoff and Frewer, {Lynn J.} and Gutteling, {Jan M.}",
year = "2018",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.22323/2.17040201",
language = "English",
volume = "17",
journal = "Journal of science communication (JCOM)",
issn = "1824-2049",
publisher = "Scuola Internazionale Superiore di Studi Avanzati (SISSA)",
number = "4",

}

Revisiting public debate on Genetic Modification and Genetically Modified Organisms. Explanations for contemporary Dutch public attitudes. / Hanssen, Lucien; Dijkstra, Anne M.; Sleenhoff, Susanne; Frewer, Lynn J.; Gutteling, Jan M.

In: Journal of Science Communication, Vol. 17, No. 4, A01, 01.10.2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Revisiting public debate on Genetic Modification and Genetically Modified Organisms. Explanations for contemporary Dutch public attitudes

AU - Hanssen, Lucien

AU - Dijkstra, Anne M.

AU - Sleenhoff, Susanne

AU - Frewer, Lynn J.

AU - Gutteling, Jan M.

PY - 2018/10/1

Y1 - 2018/10/1

N2 - Genetic Modification (GM) has been a topic of public debates during the 1990s and 2000s. In this paper we explore the relative importance of two hypothesized explanations for these controversies: (i) people's general attitude toward science and technology and (ii) their trust in governance, in GM actors, and in GM regulations, in explaining the Dutch public's Attitude toward GM applications, and in addition to that, the public's GM Information seeking behaviour. This will be conducted through the application of representative survey methodology. The results indicate that Attitudes toward GM applications are best predicted by both the attitude toward science and technology and three trust measures. GM information seeking is predicted by gender and educational level, as well as attitude toward science and technology, trust in organisations and trust in regulations (negative). Overall, psychological variables seem better predictors than demographics. Implications for future research on information seeking behaviour are discussed.

AB - Genetic Modification (GM) has been a topic of public debates during the 1990s and 2000s. In this paper we explore the relative importance of two hypothesized explanations for these controversies: (i) people's general attitude toward science and technology and (ii) their trust in governance, in GM actors, and in GM regulations, in explaining the Dutch public's Attitude toward GM applications, and in addition to that, the public's GM Information seeking behaviour. This will be conducted through the application of representative survey methodology. The results indicate that Attitudes toward GM applications are best predicted by both the attitude toward science and technology and three trust measures. GM information seeking is predicted by gender and educational level, as well as attitude toward science and technology, trust in organisations and trust in regulations (negative). Overall, psychological variables seem better predictors than demographics. Implications for future research on information seeking behaviour are discussed.

KW - Public perception of science and technology

KW - Risk communication

KW - Science communication: theory and models

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85058973896&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.22323/2.17040201

DO - 10.22323/2.17040201

M3 - Article

VL - 17

JO - Journal of science communication (JCOM)

JF - Journal of science communication (JCOM)

SN - 1824-2049

IS - 4

M1 - A01

ER -