Revisiting public debate on Genetic Modification and Genetically Modified Organisms. Explanations for contemporary Dutch public attitudes

Lucien Hanssen, Anne M. Dijkstra, Susanne Sleenhoff, Lynn J. Frewer, Jan M. Gutteling

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)
40 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Genetic Modification (GM) has been a topic of public debates during the 1990s and 2000s. In this paper we explore the relative importance of two hypothesized explanations for these controversies: (i) people's general attitude toward science and technology and (ii) their trust in governance, in GM actors, and in GM regulations, in explaining the Dutch public's Attitude toward GM applications, and in addition to that, the public's GM Information seeking behaviour. This will be conducted through the application of representative survey methodology. The results indicate that Attitudes toward GM applications are best predicted by both the attitude toward science and technology and three trust measures. GM information seeking is predicted by gender and educational level, as well as attitude toward science and technology, trust in organisations and trust in regulations (negative). Overall, psychological variables seem better predictors than demographics. Implications for future research on information seeking behaviour are discussed.

Original languageEnglish
Article numberA01
JournalJournal of Science Communication
Volume17
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Oct 2018

Keywords

  • Public perception of science and technology
  • Risk communication
  • Science communication: theory and models

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Revisiting public debate on Genetic Modification and Genetically Modified Organisms. Explanations for contemporary Dutch public attitudes'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this