Abstract
Major findings and theoretical insights gained by a study on the impact of external review reports in Dutch higher education are presented. A model of argumentation around review recommendations is presented and illustrated by cases from Dutch higher education institutions. Practical implications of using the model as a predictive tool for success and failure and as a basis for the development of a practical instrument for optimisation of external quality reviews' effects and discussed.
| Original language | Undefined |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 89-96 |
| Number of pages | 8 |
| Journal | Quality in higher education |
| Volume | 8 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2002 |
Keywords
- IR-60093
- METIS-210212
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver