Ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm: Endovascular repair is feasible in 40% of patients

M. Reichart, R. H. Geelkerken*, A. B. Huisman, R. J. van Det, P. de Smit, E. Ph Volker

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

101 Citations (Scopus)
11 Downloads (Pure)


Introduction: Open repair of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (rAAA) still has a high mortality. Endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) may be the way to improve survival rates. However, it is not clear how many patients with rAAA will be suitable for acute EVAR. Methods: Between October 2000 and April 2002 all patients with acute symptomatic or ruptured AAA were assessed for EVAR on an intention-to-treat basis with emergency computed tomographic angiography (CTA). Patient and logistic characteristics were analysed. We used two commercially available aorto uni-iliac devices with a maximum proximal diameter of 28 and 34 mm. Results: Five out of 26 patients were excluded for CTA and EVAR because of severe and persistent hypotension (3 pts) or logistic reasons (2 pts, both eligible). Twelve patients were found not eligible for EVAR due to unsuitable infrarenal aortic neck length (3 pts), neck diameter (1 pt) or a combination of both (8 pts). The remaining six patients were treated with EVAR. After 6 months no graft failure or aneurysm related deaths were recorded in the EVAR group. Conclusion: A total of 28% of patients with symptomatic or ruptured AAA was treated with EVAR. A potential 42% of patients could have been suitable for EVAR, if the correct devices had been in stock and all patients had been properly assessed.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)479-486
Number of pages8
JournalEuropean journal of vascular and endovascular surgery
Issue number5
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2003
Externally publishedYes


  • Aorto uni-iliac endograft
  • Endovascular repair
  • Ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm


Dive into the research topics of 'Ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm: Endovascular repair is feasible in 40% of patients'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this