Saving water through global trade

Ashok Chapagain, Arjen Ysbert Hoekstra, H.H.G. Savenije

Research output: Book/ReportReportProfessional

71 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Many nations save domestic water resources by importing water-intensive products and exporting commodities that are less water intensive. National water saving through the import of a product can imply saving water at a global level if the flow is from sites with high to sites with low water productivity. The report analyses the consequences of international virtual water flows on the global and national water budgets. The assessment shows that the total amount of water that would have been required in the importing countries if all imported agricultural products would have been produced domestically is 1605 Gm3/yr. These products are however being produced with only 1253 Gm3/yr in the exporting countries, saving global water resources by 352 Gm3/yr. This saving is 28 per cent of the international virtual water flows related to the trade of agricultural products and 6 per cent of the global water use in agriculture. National policy makers are however not interested in global water savings but in the status of national water resources. Egypt imports wheat and in doing so saves 3.6 Gm3/yr of its national water resources. Water use for producing export commodities can be beneficial, as for instance in Cote d’Ivoire, Ghana and Brazil, where the use of green water resources (mainly through rain-fed agriculture) for the production of stimulant crops for export has a positive economic impact on the national economy. However, export of 28 Gm3/yr of national water from Thailand related to rice export is at the cost of additional pressure on its blue water resources. Importing a product which has a relatively high ratio of green to blue virtual water content saves global blue water resources that generally have a higher opportunity cost than green water.
Original languageUndefined
Place of PublicationDelft
PublisherUnesco-IHE Institute for Water Education
Number of pages40
Publication statusPublished - 2005

Publication series

NameValue of water research report series no. 17
PublisherUNESCO-IHE Institute for Water Education
No.17

Keywords

  • METIS-227836
  • IR-58373

Cite this

Chapagain, A., Hoekstra, A. Y., & Savenije, H. H. G. (2005). Saving water through global trade. (Value of water research report series no. 17; No. 17). Delft: Unesco-IHE Institute for Water Education.
Chapagain, Ashok ; Hoekstra, Arjen Ysbert ; Savenije, H.H.G. / Saving water through global trade. Delft : Unesco-IHE Institute for Water Education, 2005. 40 p. (Value of water research report series no. 17; 17).
@book{d51d66b952974941b819197e025c6b4c,
title = "Saving water through global trade",
abstract = "Many nations save domestic water resources by importing water-intensive products and exporting commodities that are less water intensive. National water saving through the import of a product can imply saving water at a global level if the flow is from sites with high to sites with low water productivity. The report analyses the consequences of international virtual water flows on the global and national water budgets. The assessment shows that the total amount of water that would have been required in the importing countries if all imported agricultural products would have been produced domestically is 1605 Gm3/yr. These products are however being produced with only 1253 Gm3/yr in the exporting countries, saving global water resources by 352 Gm3/yr. This saving is 28 per cent of the international virtual water flows related to the trade of agricultural products and 6 per cent of the global water use in agriculture. National policy makers are however not interested in global water savings but in the status of national water resources. Egypt imports wheat and in doing so saves 3.6 Gm3/yr of its national water resources. Water use for producing export commodities can be beneficial, as for instance in Cote d’Ivoire, Ghana and Brazil, where the use of green water resources (mainly through rain-fed agriculture) for the production of stimulant crops for export has a positive economic impact on the national economy. However, export of 28 Gm3/yr of national water from Thailand related to rice export is at the cost of additional pressure on its blue water resources. Importing a product which has a relatively high ratio of green to blue virtual water content saves global blue water resources that generally have a higher opportunity cost than green water.",
keywords = "METIS-227836, IR-58373",
author = "Ashok Chapagain and Hoekstra, {Arjen Ysbert} and H.H.G. Savenije",
year = "2005",
language = "Undefined",
series = "Value of water research report series no. 17",
publisher = "Unesco-IHE Institute for Water Education",
number = "17",

}

Chapagain, A, Hoekstra, AY & Savenije, HHG 2005, Saving water through global trade. Value of water research report series no. 17, no. 17, Unesco-IHE Institute for Water Education, Delft.

Saving water through global trade. / Chapagain, Ashok; Hoekstra, Arjen Ysbert; Savenije, H.H.G.

Delft : Unesco-IHE Institute for Water Education, 2005. 40 p. (Value of water research report series no. 17; No. 17).

Research output: Book/ReportReportProfessional

TY - BOOK

T1 - Saving water through global trade

AU - Chapagain, Ashok

AU - Hoekstra, Arjen Ysbert

AU - Savenije, H.H.G.

PY - 2005

Y1 - 2005

N2 - Many nations save domestic water resources by importing water-intensive products and exporting commodities that are less water intensive. National water saving through the import of a product can imply saving water at a global level if the flow is from sites with high to sites with low water productivity. The report analyses the consequences of international virtual water flows on the global and national water budgets. The assessment shows that the total amount of water that would have been required in the importing countries if all imported agricultural products would have been produced domestically is 1605 Gm3/yr. These products are however being produced with only 1253 Gm3/yr in the exporting countries, saving global water resources by 352 Gm3/yr. This saving is 28 per cent of the international virtual water flows related to the trade of agricultural products and 6 per cent of the global water use in agriculture. National policy makers are however not interested in global water savings but in the status of national water resources. Egypt imports wheat and in doing so saves 3.6 Gm3/yr of its national water resources. Water use for producing export commodities can be beneficial, as for instance in Cote d’Ivoire, Ghana and Brazil, where the use of green water resources (mainly through rain-fed agriculture) for the production of stimulant crops for export has a positive economic impact on the national economy. However, export of 28 Gm3/yr of national water from Thailand related to rice export is at the cost of additional pressure on its blue water resources. Importing a product which has a relatively high ratio of green to blue virtual water content saves global blue water resources that generally have a higher opportunity cost than green water.

AB - Many nations save domestic water resources by importing water-intensive products and exporting commodities that are less water intensive. National water saving through the import of a product can imply saving water at a global level if the flow is from sites with high to sites with low water productivity. The report analyses the consequences of international virtual water flows on the global and national water budgets. The assessment shows that the total amount of water that would have been required in the importing countries if all imported agricultural products would have been produced domestically is 1605 Gm3/yr. These products are however being produced with only 1253 Gm3/yr in the exporting countries, saving global water resources by 352 Gm3/yr. This saving is 28 per cent of the international virtual water flows related to the trade of agricultural products and 6 per cent of the global water use in agriculture. National policy makers are however not interested in global water savings but in the status of national water resources. Egypt imports wheat and in doing so saves 3.6 Gm3/yr of its national water resources. Water use for producing export commodities can be beneficial, as for instance in Cote d’Ivoire, Ghana and Brazil, where the use of green water resources (mainly through rain-fed agriculture) for the production of stimulant crops for export has a positive economic impact on the national economy. However, export of 28 Gm3/yr of national water from Thailand related to rice export is at the cost of additional pressure on its blue water resources. Importing a product which has a relatively high ratio of green to blue virtual water content saves global blue water resources that generally have a higher opportunity cost than green water.

KW - METIS-227836

KW - IR-58373

M3 - Report

T3 - Value of water research report series no. 17

BT - Saving water through global trade

PB - Unesco-IHE Institute for Water Education

CY - Delft

ER -

Chapagain A, Hoekstra AY, Savenije HHG. Saving water through global trade. Delft: Unesco-IHE Institute for Water Education, 2005. 40 p. (Value of water research report series no. 17; 17).