Scaffolding learners in designing investigation assignments for a computer simulation

Cornelise Vreman-de Olde, Ton de Jong

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

20 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study examined the effect of scaffolding students who learned by designing assignments for a computer simulation on the physics topic of alternating circuits. We compared the students' assignments and the knowledge acquired in a scaffolded group (N=23) and a non-scaffolded group (N=19). The scaffold consisted of a Design Sheet that guided students through the different steps in the design of assignments (generate an idea, transform the idea into an assignment, and evaluate the assignment) and provided them with specific directions on how to perform these steps. On average, students in the non-scaffolded group designed more assignments than students in the scaffolded group, but the scaffolded students designed relative by more assignments about the relations in the domain, more often gave exact descriptions of the relations in the domain, and more often referred back to the computer simulation to explain their findings. No differences on knowledge tests, however, were found between the two groups of students. In the discussion, we give suggestions on how to adapt the scaffolding to improve not only the learning process but also knowledge acquisition.
Original languageUndefined
Pages (from-to)63-74
JournalJournal of computer assisted learning
Volume22
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2006

Keywords

  • IR-58495
  • METIS-235456

Cite this

@article{30535ee163144b0eaaf63c741edc997a,
title = "Scaffolding learners in designing investigation assignments for a computer simulation",
abstract = "This study examined the effect of scaffolding students who learned by designing assignments for a computer simulation on the physics topic of alternating circuits. We compared the students' assignments and the knowledge acquired in a scaffolded group (N=23) and a non-scaffolded group (N=19). The scaffold consisted of a Design Sheet that guided students through the different steps in the design of assignments (generate an idea, transform the idea into an assignment, and evaluate the assignment) and provided them with specific directions on how to perform these steps. On average, students in the non-scaffolded group designed more assignments than students in the scaffolded group, but the scaffolded students designed relative by more assignments about the relations in the domain, more often gave exact descriptions of the relations in the domain, and more often referred back to the computer simulation to explain their findings. No differences on knowledge tests, however, were found between the two groups of students. In the discussion, we give suggestions on how to adapt the scaffolding to improve not only the learning process but also knowledge acquisition.",
keywords = "IR-58495, METIS-235456",
author = "{Vreman-de Olde}, Cornelise and {de Jong}, Ton",
year = "2006",
doi = "10.1111/j.1365-2729.2006.00160.x",
language = "Undefined",
volume = "22",
pages = "63--74",
journal = "Journal of computer assisted learning",
issn = "0266-4909",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "1",

}

Scaffolding learners in designing investigation assignments for a computer simulation. / Vreman-de Olde, Cornelise; de Jong, Ton.

In: Journal of computer assisted learning, Vol. 22, No. 1, 2006, p. 63-74.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Scaffolding learners in designing investigation assignments for a computer simulation

AU - Vreman-de Olde, Cornelise

AU - de Jong, Ton

PY - 2006

Y1 - 2006

N2 - This study examined the effect of scaffolding students who learned by designing assignments for a computer simulation on the physics topic of alternating circuits. We compared the students' assignments and the knowledge acquired in a scaffolded group (N=23) and a non-scaffolded group (N=19). The scaffold consisted of a Design Sheet that guided students through the different steps in the design of assignments (generate an idea, transform the idea into an assignment, and evaluate the assignment) and provided them with specific directions on how to perform these steps. On average, students in the non-scaffolded group designed more assignments than students in the scaffolded group, but the scaffolded students designed relative by more assignments about the relations in the domain, more often gave exact descriptions of the relations in the domain, and more often referred back to the computer simulation to explain their findings. No differences on knowledge tests, however, were found between the two groups of students. In the discussion, we give suggestions on how to adapt the scaffolding to improve not only the learning process but also knowledge acquisition.

AB - This study examined the effect of scaffolding students who learned by designing assignments for a computer simulation on the physics topic of alternating circuits. We compared the students' assignments and the knowledge acquired in a scaffolded group (N=23) and a non-scaffolded group (N=19). The scaffold consisted of a Design Sheet that guided students through the different steps in the design of assignments (generate an idea, transform the idea into an assignment, and evaluate the assignment) and provided them with specific directions on how to perform these steps. On average, students in the non-scaffolded group designed more assignments than students in the scaffolded group, but the scaffolded students designed relative by more assignments about the relations in the domain, more often gave exact descriptions of the relations in the domain, and more often referred back to the computer simulation to explain their findings. No differences on knowledge tests, however, were found between the two groups of students. In the discussion, we give suggestions on how to adapt the scaffolding to improve not only the learning process but also knowledge acquisition.

KW - IR-58495

KW - METIS-235456

U2 - 10.1111/j.1365-2729.2006.00160.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1365-2729.2006.00160.x

M3 - Article

VL - 22

SP - 63

EP - 74

JO - Journal of computer assisted learning

JF - Journal of computer assisted learning

SN - 0266-4909

IS - 1

ER -