Abstract
School effectiveness research (SER) has flourished since the 1980s. In recent years, however, various authors have criticised several aspects of SER. A thorough review of recent criticism can serve as a good starting point for addressing the flaws of SER, where appropriate, thereby supporting its further development. This article begins by reviewing the criticism from different perspectives by discussing the political-ideological nature of SER, its theoretical limitations and the research methodology it applies. The review of each type of criticism is accompanied by a review of the recommendations that the critics propose for improving SER. We then proceed to present our views on each line of criticism and propose 5 avenues that we consider promising for the further development of SER.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 249-279 |
| Number of pages | 30 |
| Journal | School effectiveness and school improvement |
| Volume | 16 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2005 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'School effectiveness research: from a review of the criticism to recommendations for further development'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver