School performance feedback systems in the USA and in the Netherlands: a comparison

Kim Schildkamp, Charles Teddlie

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

43 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Schools around the world are using instruments for performance feedback, but there is no scientific evidence that they have positive effects on education. This paper compares a School Performance Feedback System (SPFS) used in the USA as an accountability instrument to an SPFS used in The Netherlands. The study employs a unique database: one in which 2 separate countries with 2 distinct performance systems are compared using the same instruments. The use and effects of both SPFSs are compared to acquire more knowledge about the utilization and effects of SPFSs in an international context. Also, the variables which influence SPFSs are presented and then utilized to predict the use of the 2 SPFSs in their 2 separate contexts.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)255-282
JournalEducational research and evaluation
Volume14
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2008

Fingerprint

Netherlands
school
performance
utilization
responsibility
evidence
education

Keywords

  • School Improvement
  • School Performance Feedback Systems
  • METIS-251779
  • IR-60210
  • Evaluation
  • Accountability

Cite this

@article{6cabb9ab2f324c71a8197b23a983285e,
title = "School performance feedback systems in the USA and in the Netherlands: a comparison",
abstract = "Schools around the world are using instruments for performance feedback, but there is no scientific evidence that they have positive effects on education. This paper compares a School Performance Feedback System (SPFS) used in the USA as an accountability instrument to an SPFS used in The Netherlands. The study employs a unique database: one in which 2 separate countries with 2 distinct performance systems are compared using the same instruments. The use and effects of both SPFSs are compared to acquire more knowledge about the utilization and effects of SPFSs in an international context. Also, the variables which influence SPFSs are presented and then utilized to predict the use of the 2 SPFSs in their 2 separate contexts.",
keywords = "School Improvement, School Performance Feedback Systems, METIS-251779, IR-60210, Evaluation, Accountability",
author = "Kim Schildkamp and Charles Teddlie",
year = "2008",
doi = "10.1080/13803610802048874",
language = "English",
volume = "14",
pages = "255--282",
journal = "Educational research and evaluation",
issn = "1380-3611",
publisher = "Taylor & Francis",
number = "3",

}

School performance feedback systems in the USA and in the Netherlands: a comparison. / Schildkamp, Kim; Teddlie, Charles.

In: Educational research and evaluation, Vol. 14, No. 3, 2008, p. 255-282.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - School performance feedback systems in the USA and in the Netherlands: a comparison

AU - Schildkamp, Kim

AU - Teddlie, Charles

PY - 2008

Y1 - 2008

N2 - Schools around the world are using instruments for performance feedback, but there is no scientific evidence that they have positive effects on education. This paper compares a School Performance Feedback System (SPFS) used in the USA as an accountability instrument to an SPFS used in The Netherlands. The study employs a unique database: one in which 2 separate countries with 2 distinct performance systems are compared using the same instruments. The use and effects of both SPFSs are compared to acquire more knowledge about the utilization and effects of SPFSs in an international context. Also, the variables which influence SPFSs are presented and then utilized to predict the use of the 2 SPFSs in their 2 separate contexts.

AB - Schools around the world are using instruments for performance feedback, but there is no scientific evidence that they have positive effects on education. This paper compares a School Performance Feedback System (SPFS) used in the USA as an accountability instrument to an SPFS used in The Netherlands. The study employs a unique database: one in which 2 separate countries with 2 distinct performance systems are compared using the same instruments. The use and effects of both SPFSs are compared to acquire more knowledge about the utilization and effects of SPFSs in an international context. Also, the variables which influence SPFSs are presented and then utilized to predict the use of the 2 SPFSs in their 2 separate contexts.

KW - School Improvement

KW - School Performance Feedback Systems

KW - METIS-251779

KW - IR-60210

KW - Evaluation

KW - Accountability

U2 - 10.1080/13803610802048874

DO - 10.1080/13803610802048874

M3 - Article

VL - 14

SP - 255

EP - 282

JO - Educational research and evaluation

JF - Educational research and evaluation

SN - 1380-3611

IS - 3

ER -