TY - JOUR
T1 - Scientists' transition to academic entrepreneurship
T2 - Economic and psychological determinants
AU - Goethner, Maximilian
AU - Obschonka, Martin
AU - Silbereisen, Rainer K.
AU - Cantner, Uwe
N1 - Funding Information:
Financial support by the Thuringian Ministry of Education (Thüringer Kultusministerium) and the Hans Böckler Foundation (Hans-Böckler-Stiftung) within the research project “Success and failure of innovative start-ups – A process-oriented analysis of economic and psychological determinants” (PIs: Uwe Cantner, Rainer K. Silbereisen, Eva Schmitt-Rodermund, and Gabriele Beibst) is gratefully acknowledged. The second author was further supported by the PATHWAYS International Postdoctoral Fellowship Programme for the Comparative Study of Productive Youth Development (Jacobs Foundation). Moreover, the authors would like to thank the participants of the DIME Final Conference 2011 (Maastricht, The Netherlands) for helpful comments and suggestions.
PY - 2012/6
Y1 - 2012/6
N2 - This study investigated academic scientists' transition to entrepreneurship by studying their academic entrepreneurial intentions (to found a business in order to market their research knowledge) and actual founding behavior. We developed and tested a conceptual model integrating both economic and psychological perspectives. Applying the theory of planned behavior, we examined the economic factors (scientists' human capital, social capital, expected entrepreneurial benefits) as distal predictors (background factors) of academic entrepreneurial intentions. The psychological factors (entrepreneurial attitudes, norms, control perceptions) were examined as proximal intention predictors. Findings were derived from a path analysis utilizing archival and survey data on German scientists (N=496). We found that attitudes and perceived control predicted entrepreneurial intentions. Social norms in turn had no effect. As regards the economic factors, human and social capital exhibited indirect effects on intentions via entrepreneurial attitudes and control perceptions, while additional direct effects of both capitals showed up significantly as well. Expected benefits from engaging in academic entrepreneurship (i.e., expected financial and reputational gain) only showed indirect effects on intentions via attitudes and perceived control. In addition, longitudinal results indicated that entrepreneurial intentions indeed forecasted entrepreneurial behavior, while certain barriers have a diminishing influence on this relationship. Our results are discussed with an emphasis on the long-neglected importance of the interplay of economic and psychological determinants for scientists' transition to academic entrepreneurship.
AB - This study investigated academic scientists' transition to entrepreneurship by studying their academic entrepreneurial intentions (to found a business in order to market their research knowledge) and actual founding behavior. We developed and tested a conceptual model integrating both economic and psychological perspectives. Applying the theory of planned behavior, we examined the economic factors (scientists' human capital, social capital, expected entrepreneurial benefits) as distal predictors (background factors) of academic entrepreneurial intentions. The psychological factors (entrepreneurial attitudes, norms, control perceptions) were examined as proximal intention predictors. Findings were derived from a path analysis utilizing archival and survey data on German scientists (N=496). We found that attitudes and perceived control predicted entrepreneurial intentions. Social norms in turn had no effect. As regards the economic factors, human and social capital exhibited indirect effects on intentions via entrepreneurial attitudes and control perceptions, while additional direct effects of both capitals showed up significantly as well. Expected benefits from engaging in academic entrepreneurship (i.e., expected financial and reputational gain) only showed indirect effects on intentions via attitudes and perceived control. In addition, longitudinal results indicated that entrepreneurial intentions indeed forecasted entrepreneurial behavior, while certain barriers have a diminishing influence on this relationship. Our results are discussed with an emphasis on the long-neglected importance of the interplay of economic and psychological determinants for scientists' transition to academic entrepreneurship.
KW - Academic entrepreneurship
KW - Entrepreneurial intentions
KW - Human capital
KW - Social capital
KW - Occupational choice
KW - Theory of Planned Behavior
KW - n/a OA procedure
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84857641008&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.joep.2011.12.002
DO - 10.1016/j.joep.2011.12.002
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84857641008
SN - 0167-4870
VL - 33
SP - 628
EP - 641
JO - Journal of economic psychology
JF - Journal of economic psychology
IS - 3
ER -